Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
icici Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Smt Rajni and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h March, 2014 + MAC. APP. No.215/2012 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. Versus SMT RAJNI & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Uday Raj Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 10.10.2011, whereby Ld. Tribunal has awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.10,00,440/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the Claim Petition till realization of the amount.2. Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that on the date of accident, deceased was 28 years of age and claimed to be earning Rs.8,750/- per month, however, the claimants failed to prove the employment of the deceased and his salary. Therefore, Ld. Tribunal has assessed his income as Rs.4,082/per month as per the minimum wages applicable to ...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Dwarkadas Harinayan Maheshwari and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2156/2012 & I.A. No.12977/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus DWARKADAS HARINAYAN MAHESHWARI & ORS ..... Defendants Through Defendants already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 28 th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.95,13,423/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendants, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12977/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 28th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Anil Mithalal and Co. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2087/2012 & I.A. No.12758/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus ANIL MITHALAL & CO. & ORS ..... Defendants Through Defendants already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.47,89,603/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendants, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12758/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award w...
Vaibhav Bhatia and anr. Vs. M/S Landt Finance Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.88/2014 % 24th March, 2014 VAIBHAV BHATIA & ANR. ......Appellants Through: Mr. Suhail Khan, Adv. VERSUS M/S L&T FINANCE LTD. & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM52262014 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.5227/2014 (condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing of the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. FAO882014 & CM No.5228/2014 (Stay) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) impugning the judgment of the court below by which objections filed by the appellants under Section 34 of the Act were dismissed.2. The court below notes that appellants did not appear in the arbitration proceedings initially and appeared through a person one Mr. Narendra Bhatia on 12.3.2009 but th...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Munjal Investment
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2081/2012 & I.A. No.12744/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus MUNJAL INVESTMENT Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.61,20,918/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12744/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by t...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Sareen and Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2168/2012 & I.A. No.13008/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus SAREEN & CO Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 12th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.9,22,568/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.13008/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 12th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the lear...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Tushar Bedi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2157/2012 & I.A. No.12979/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus TUSHAR BEDI & ORS Through ..... Defendants Defendants already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 28 th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.95,62,019/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendants, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12979/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 28th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made...
Smt Dulari Devi and ors. Vs. Pooran Chand and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h March, 2014 % + CM(M) 284/2014 SMT DULARI DEVI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate. Versus POORAN CHAND & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.K.L. Nandwani, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.5230/2014 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 284/2014 1. Notice issued.2. Mr.Nandwani, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.3/Insurance Company.3. With the consent of the parties, the instant petition is taken up for final disposal.4. Vide the instant petition, the petitioners are seeking direction to release the amount lying deposited in FDR with State Bank of India, Saket Courts Branch, New Delhi, in their favour.5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners are living...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. K.P. Bihani and Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2164/2012 & I.A. No.12999/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus K.P. BIHANI & CO Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 15th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.14,40,877/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12999/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 15th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by th...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Analysis Securities (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2154/2012 & I.A. No.12970/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus ANALYSIS SECURITIES (P) LTD ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 28th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.1,83,33,747/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12970/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 28th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award w...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »