Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. W.G.F. Securities Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2150/2012 & I.A. No.12960/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus W.G.F. SECURITIES LTD. Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 28th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.3,78,21,932/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12960/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 28th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was ma...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Foresight Financial Services Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2086/2012 & I.A. No.12756/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus FORESIGHT FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.47,89,603/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12756/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Awar...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Kirit Kumar Shah
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2128/2012 & I.A. No.12884/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus KIRIT KUMAR SHAH Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 12th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.9,71,362/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12884/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 12th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the...
intex Technologies (India) Ltd Vs. Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. 03.2014 LPA2552014 INTEX TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) LTD ..... Appellant versus TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON AND ANR .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr Aaditya V.K., Mr Balbir Singh, Ms Monica Benjamin and Mr Abhimanyu Chopra, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr. Advocate, Mr C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Advocate and Ms Pratibha M. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr Ravi Nair, Ms Archana Sahdeva, Mr Ashutosh Kumar, Mr B. Prashant Kumar, Mr Akshay Nanda, Ms Shivanghi Sukumar and Mr Shoumil Ghoshal, Advocates for R-1 Mr Anupam Sanghi, Advocate for R-2 with Mr Sukesh Mishra, Joint Director, CCI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM52452014 The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. LPA2552014 1. This appeal is directed against ...
Rohtash Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : March 24, 2014 + CRL.A.268/2011 ROHTASH ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Saahila Lambha, Advocate. VERSUS STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.4841/2014 Counsel for the appellant does not press the application. The application is dismissed as not pressed. CRL.A.268/2011 1. With the consent of the parties, the appeal is heard on merits as the appellant has undergone five years incarceration.2. Deepak Kumar @ Deepu, Sanjay, Harish Kumar @ Pintu, Rohtash and Deepak s/o Babu Lal were arrested by the police of Police Station Shahdara in case FIR No.194/04 and sent for trial. Allegations as projected in the charge-sheet against them were that on the night intervening 09/10.06.04, the complainant-Krishan Dev Pathak was robbed by them of his mobile phone make Sony Ericson, `5,200/-, office key and one Delhi Govt.card at knife point when he was travelling in...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Madhukar Khosla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2061/2012 & I.A. No.12695/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus MADHUKAR KHOSLA Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 10th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.3,95,495/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12695/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 10th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the ...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. R.G. Nagesan and Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2151/2012 & I.A. No.12962/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus R.G. NAGESAN & CO Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 28th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.62,42,558/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12962/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 28th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by t...
Tasim and ors Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~A-42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:19. 3.2014 Judgment delivered on:24.3.2014 CRL.A. 144/2006 TASIM & ORS. ..... Appellants Through Mr.Pankaj Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 28.01.2006 and 30.01.2006 respectively wherein they have been convicted under Sections 387/34 of the IPC and have been sentenced to undergo RI for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- In default of payment of fine to undergo SI for 3 months. The appellant Tasim has been additionally convicted under Section 25 of the Arms Act and had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 1 year for the said offence. The sentences were to run currently; benefit of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C. had been granted to them. 2 Nominal rolls of the appellants have been called. They reflect that ...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Rajul K. Shah and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2163/2012 & I.A. No.12996/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus RAJUL K SHAH & ORS Through ..... Defendants Defendants already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 15th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.1,72,838/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendants, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12996/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 15th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made ...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Ramani and Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2270/2012 & I.A. No.13637/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus RAMANI & CO Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd July, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.21,47,428/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.13637/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 6th September, 2010 till 23rd July, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »