Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Himal K. Parikh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2166/2012 & I.A. No.13004/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus HIMAL K. PARIKH Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 12th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.9,71,362/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.13004/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 12th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the ...
Cholamandalam Ms General Ins. Co. Ltd. Vs. Ashok Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 232/2013 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. Versus ASHOK SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. for R1 to R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. In view of the detailed order passed today in MAC. Appeal No.152/2014, the present appeal is dismissed.2. Consequently, the statutory amount be released in favour of the appellant and the remaining compensation amount with up-to-date interest accrued thereon be released in favour of the respondents / claimants in terms of award dated 24.09.2012 on taking necessary steps by them. SURESH KAIT, J.MARCH24 2014 Jg/RS...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Nahata
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2148/2012 & I.A. No.12955/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus RAJENDRA NAHATA Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 15th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.15,87,186/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12955/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 15th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the...
Mohd Shakir Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.600/2011 Reserved on :3. d March, 2014 Date of decision:24. h March, 2014 MOHD SHAKIR ..... Appellant Through Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M. Shamikh, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.689/2011 MOHD JAVED & ANR. ..... Appellants Through Mr. Anil Hooda & Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The aforementioned appeals arise out of a common judgment dated 20th April, 2011 in Sessions Case No.70/2008 arising out of FIR No.484/2007, Police Station Gokul Puri.2. The three appellants, namely, Mohd. Shakir, Mohd. Javed and Mehfooz, by the impugned judgment dated 20th April, 2011 have been convicted under Sections 302, 364 and 201 read with Sections 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Pee Aar Leasing Credit Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2075/2012 & I.A. No.12728/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus PEE AAR LEASING CREDIT LTD. ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.47,89,603/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12728/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was...
Bhai Sarabjit Singh Vs. Indu Sabharwal and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:24. h March, 2014 + CS(OS) 753/2014, IA No.4783/2014 (for exemption) & IA No.4782/2014 (u/O39R-1&2 CPC) BHAI SARABJIT SINGH Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Amit Kumar & Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advs. Versus INDU SABHARWAL & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Dr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arvind Bhatt with defendant no.1 Indu Sabharwal in person. Mr. Sanjiv Kakra & Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Advs. for D-2&d-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for declaration of the Settlement Agreement dated 6th August, 2010, entered into between the plaintiff and the three defendants and on the basis of which CS(OS) No.1698/2007 was decreed on 8th November, 2013, as null and void on account of fraud and misrepresentation played upon the plaintiff by the three defendants, pleading:- (a) that the plaintiff and the defendant no.2 Ms. Nisha Singh and the defend...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Janak Thakkar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2064/2012 & I.A. No.12703/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus JANAK THAKKAR Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 10th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.1,51,487/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12703/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 10th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the le...
Mohd HasnaIn and ors. Vs. Jagram Meena and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:24. h March, 2014 + MAC.APP. 152/2014 MOHD HASNAIN & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Mr. Navneet Goyal, Mr. Y.R. Sharma and Mr. Manish Maini, Advs. Versus JAGRAM MEENA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R3. AND + MAC.APP. 232/2013 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INS. CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. Versus ASHOK SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. for R1 to R3. AND + MAC.APP. 1190/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. Versus CHHOTE LAL PRASAD & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Srikant Prasad and Mr. Janme Jay, Advs. AND + MAC.APP. 196/2013 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. Versus A.K. PURI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Raman Duggal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURES...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Harvest Financial Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2071/2012 & I.A. No.12720/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus HARVEST FINANCIAL LTD. ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.44,97,858/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12720/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Dolf Finance Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2085/2012 & I.A. No.12754/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus DOLF FINANCE LTD. Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.47,89,603/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12754/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by t...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »