Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M.G.Ramachandran and anr. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : March 11, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on : March 31, 2014 + LPA4292013 M.G.RAMACHANDRAN AND ANR. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr.Shanti Bhushan, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kumar Mihir and Mr.Kartik Seth Advocates versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Abhinav Mehrota, Advocate with Mr.Anshuj Dhingra, Advocate for R-1 with Mr.Vijender Dahiya, A.E./SDMC Mr.Pawan Mathur, Advocate for R-3 with Mr.Arun Vashist, Deputy Direction Planning, DDA Ms.Amrita Panda, Advocate with Mr.Nitish Gupta, Advocate for R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. As would be evident from the facts noted hereinafter since much content of the arguments advanced during hearing of the appeal was in the realm of theory, we would be constrained to note the pleadings of the appellants in the writ petition so that we can clearly bring out that muc...
Sona Chawla Vs. Indian Airlines Ltd. (Now Known as Nacil)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:09. 01.2014 Judgment delivered on:31. 03.2014 % + WP(C) No.30/2010 SANGITA GARG .... Petitioner Versus INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS NACIL) + .....Respondent WP(C) No.6488/2010 PUNITA BAKSHI .... Petitioner Versus NATIONAL AVIATION COMPANY OF INDIA LTD. (NACIL) .....Respondent + WP(C) No.8111/2011 SONA CHAWLA .... Petitioner Versus INDIAN AIRLINES LTD. (NOW KNOWN AS NACIL) .....Respondent ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioners: Mr Arvind Kumar Sharma, Advocate in WP(C) 30/2010 & 8111/2011. Mr Amit Bansal, Advocate in WP(C) 6488/2010. For the Respondents: Mr Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Advocate with Mr Rahul Malhotra, Ms Garima Bose, Ms Ekta Mehta, Mr Shreyans Singhvi & Mr Umrao Singh Rawat, Advocates. CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 s fat fit?. At least in the context of the job functions, the petitioners, were required to perform - is the question which is raised in these writ petiti...
Fauja Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
$~R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: March 31, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5989/2003 FAUJA SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.O.P.Agarwal, Advocate with Mr.Deepak Agarwal, Advocate versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Ms.Niti Arora, Advocate for Mr.Sachin Datta, Advocate Represented by: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, (ORAL) 1. Working as an Inspector with Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), a charge memo was served upon the writ petitioner on August 06, 1997 listing three charges as under:ARTICLE OF CHARGE-I No.751080256 Insp/Exe.Fauja Singh is charged for having committed acts of gross indiscipline and misconduct in that he developed connection with one civilian named Debabrata Kanjilal alias Debu Kanjilal, resident of Road No.5, C/1/8, New Town, Burnpur and engaged himself in a clandestine deal with the latter, in extracting money from the reserve candidate, whose names appeared in the waiti...
Raju @ Nagesh Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :31. t March, 2014 + CRL.A. 1306/2012 & Crl.M.B.No.2547/2013 NAVEEN KUMAR @ BAWLA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.B.S.Chowdhary with Mr.Anshul Baranwal, Advocates. versus STATE(NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Complainant present in person. + CRL.A. 1307/2012 & Crl.M.B.No.2546/2013 RAJU @ NAGESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.B.S.Chowdhary with Mr.Anshul Baranwal, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. Complainant present in person. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Naveen Kumar @ Bawla (A-1) and Raju @ Nagesh (A-2) have filed appeals to challenge the legality and correctness of a judgment dated 17.10.2012 in Sessions Case No.60/09 arising out of a FIR No.538/08 registered at Police Station Sultanpuri, by which they were held guilty for committing offences under Sections 307/34 IPC; 25/27/54/59 Arms Act. By an order on se...
Rajan Prakash and ors Vs. Delhi Police Through Its Commissioner and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: March 31, 2014 + W.P.(CRL) 2079/2013 RAJAN PRAKASH & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra & Mr. Rishi Kumar, Adv. versus DELHI POLICE THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State. ASI Pradeep Kumar, P.S. AmanVihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein prayer is made for quashing of FIR No.614/2013 under Section 186/353/332/308/506/34 IPC registered at P.S. Aman Vihar against the petitioners.2. Petitioner No.1 was a candidate of Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in the Assembly Election of 2013 in Delhi. Petitioner No.2 is a retired Army Captain and volunteer of the aforesaid party. Petitioner No.3 is also a volunteer of the aforesaid party. Petitioners have alleged that they have been falsely implicated in the aforesaid FIR. It is alleged that on 4...
Vishal Sharma @ Rinku Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment :31,03.2014 CRL.REV.P. 198/2014 VISHAL SHARMA @ RINKU Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Baldev Raj and Ms.Shikha Tyagi, Advs. versus STATE Through ..... Respondent Mr. Navin K. Jha, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. No.5302/2011 (Exemption) 1 Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2 Application disposed off. CRL.REV.P. 198/2014 & Crl. M.A. No.5301/2014 3 This revision petition has been filed against the order dated 18.02.2014 wherein charges had been framed under Sections 392/411/34 of the IPC as also under Section 3 (1) (ii), 3 (2), 3 (4) and 3 (5) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). The petitioner is aggrieved by the aforenoted order. 4 Attention has been drawn to an order passed by this Court on 13.01.2014; submission being that the matter had been remanded back to the trial Judge by this Court and the ...
Prem Singh @ Prem Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 12, 2014 DECIDED ON : March 31, 2014 + CRL.A. 1196/2012 PREM SINGH @ PREM Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ravi P.Shukla, Advocate with Mr.Dananjay Singh, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Sudeep Punia, PS Karol Bagh. CRL.A. 1373/2012 SACHIN VERMA @ ASHU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Vimal Puggal, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Sudeep Punia, PS Karol Bagh. CRL.A. 1206/2012 RAVI GUPTA @ RAVI Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ved Prakash, Advocate with Mr.Amit Chaudhary, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through : Crl.A.No.1196/2012 & connected appeals ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Sudeep Punia, PS Karol Bagh. Page 1 of 23 + CRL.A. 1169/2012 GOPAL Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.K.Tarun, Advocate with Mr.Anand Kumar, Advocate. versus STATE Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Sudeep Punia, PS K...
Niti Wadhawan Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-10
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 03.2014 Pronounced on:31. 03.2014 + ITA4832012, C.M. No.14602/2012 (for exemption) & 20240/2013 (for amendment of appeal) NITI WADHAWAN ..Appellant Versus DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-10 + ITA2512013 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX XV ..Respondent ..Appellant Versus M/S. NITI WADHAWAN ..Respondent Through: Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ram Avtar Bansal and Mr. Naman Nayar, Advocates, for Ms. Niti Wadhawan. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Jr. Standing Counsel, for Revenue. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The following questions of law arise in the present cross appeals by the assessee and the Revenue against a common order of the Income Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 20.04.2012 in IT (SS) A. ITA48312 & ITA25113 Page 1 No 242/Del/2006 and IT (SS) A. No.8/Del/2007. The following questions of law arise for consider...
indus Towers Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. 03.2014 Pronounced on:31. 03.2014 + W.P.(C) 6085/2013, C.M. NO.13383/2013, 13384/2013 & 13385/2013 INDUS TOWERS LTD. ..Petitioner Through: Sh. N. Venkatraman, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Gajendra Maheshwari, Sh. Puneet Siddhartha and Sh. Sumeet Batra, Advocates. Versus CIT & ORS. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Sh. Raghvendra Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The Petitioner in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India (hereafter Indus) is aggrieved by an order (impugned order) of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, (the Act) declining its request for determination of lower rate of tax deduction at source (TDS). The order was made after a hearing given to Indus, in terms of this Courts previous order in WP(C) No.4518/2013 dated 19.07.2013.2. In...
Punit Vohra Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-31-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO No.294/2012 31st March, 2014 PUNIT VOHRA Through: ......Appellant Mr. Sanjeev Mehta, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA Through: ...... Respondent Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal dated 20.12.2011 seeking enhancement of compensation from Rs.3,20,000/- to Rs.4 lacs.2. The facts of the case are that the appellant/applicant/Mr. Punit Vohra on 3.9.2008, when he was about 40 years of age, was travelling by EMU Train from Badli to Old Delhi Railway Station when he met with an untoward incident and suffered injuries.3. the The impugned judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal holds respondent-Railways guilty of negligence and has awarded compensation with respect to various injuries by awarding a sum of Rs.3,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »