Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Poonam and Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2162/2012 & I.A. No.12991/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus POONAM & CO Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 12th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.8,24,959/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12991/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 12th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the lear...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. First Financial Services Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2122/2012 & I.A. No.12872/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus FIRST FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 28th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.1,53,69,508/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12872/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 28th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award...
Smt Sayara and ors. Vs. Oriental Ins Co Ltd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 633/2013 SMT SAYARA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate. Versus ORIENTAL INS CO LTD & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Vijay Kumar Gupta, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. dated Vide the present appeal, the appellants have assailed the award 04.04.2013, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.9,72,200/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing the petition till realization of the amount.2. The appellants/claimants are seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as noted above.3. Mr. Anshuman Bal, Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that the deceased Nazim Ali, died at the age of 32 years. He was a fruit seller and was earning Rs.9,000/- per month. He left behind nine dependants, inclusive of young widow,...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Vishwas Business Associates Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2271/2012 & I.A. No.13639/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus VISHWAS BUSINESS ASSOCIATES LTD ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd July, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.40,72,167/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.13639/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 6th September, 2010 till 23rd July, 2012, i.e. the date on which the A...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Arihant Credit Capital Market Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2149/2012 & I.A. No.12958/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus ARIHANT CREDIT CAPITAL MARKET LTD. ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 3rd June, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.93,44,872/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12958/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 3rd June, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Aw...
Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Delco Precitone Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h JANUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :24. h MARCH, 2014 + CRL.A. 295/2012 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Subhash Bansal, Advocate. VERSUS DELCO PRECITONE JEWELLERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Crl.A.295/2012 has been preferred under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as FERA) against the final order dated 09.09.2009 of Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, New Delhi in Appeal Nos. 532/2004 to 534/2004. The Appellate Tribunal allowed appeals of the respondents and quashed the adjudication order dated 20.01.2004. CRL.M.A.3304/2012 (delay) in CRL.A. 295/2012 2. The application has been moved for condonation of delay of 804 days in filing the appeal.3. Learned counsel for the appellant (Enforcement Directorate) urged that the Appellate Tribunals order dated 09.09.2009 was communicated to the offic...
Aakansha Monga Vs. the Honble High Court of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h March, 2014 + W.P.(C) 1848/2014 AAKANSHA MONGA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Joy Dip Bhattacharya, Advocate. versus THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS..Respondent Through Mr. Karan Mehta, Advocate for Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.In view of decision dated 21st March, 2014 in W.P.(C) 1869/2014, Preetesh Raman Singh Vs. Delhi High Court through Registrar General, the present writ petition has to be dismissed. On the last date of submission of the application form, i.e. 24th March, 2014, the petitioner herein admittedly does not meet the eligibility educational requirements stipulated in clause b of Rule 14 of Delhi Judicial Service Rules, 1970. The petitioner is still a student of LL.B, studying in the 10th semester (final year).2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Master Himanshu and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h March, 2014 % + CM(M) 1084/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. Versus MASTER HIMANSHU & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. S.Shahi and Mr. R.A. Pandey, Advs. for R1. Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 19.09.2012, whereby the evidence of the petitioner was closed by the Ld. Tribunal.2. Vide order dated 28.09.2012, this Court stayed the proceedings pending before the Claim Tribunal.3. It is undisputed that petitioner filed its written statement, wherein no specific ground was taken that the driver of the offending vehicle was not holding valid driving licence on the date of accident.4. It is also not in dispute that on an application being moved by the petitioner for summoning of witness from the Transport Authority to pro...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. M/S Km Capital Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2088/2012 & I.A. No.12760/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus M/S KM CAPITAL LTD. Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.46,92,351/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12760/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Investment
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2063/2012 & I.A. No.12701/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus HINDUSTAN INVESTMENT Through None ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 10th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.2,49,090/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12701/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 10th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the learned Arbitrator...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »