Delhi Court March 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Castrol Ltd. and anr. Vs. M/S Pandit Oil Company and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-25-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :25. h March, 2014 % + CS(OS) 815/2007 CASTROL LTD. AND ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr.Sushant Singh Singh, Adv. versus M/S PANDIT OIL COMPANY & ORS. Through: None ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction, infringement of trade marks and copyright, passing off, damages and delivery up. Summons were issued in the suit on 4.05.2007. Counsel for the defendant no.2 and defendant no.5 entered appearance on 14.9.2007. Written statement was filed on behalf of defendant no.5 on 18.2.2008. Since none appeared on behalf of defendant no.3 and defendant no.4, on 14.9.2007 and again on 18.2.2008 despite service, defendants no.3 and 4 were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 18.2.2008. Fresh summons were issued for defendant no.1 and 2 on 18.2.2008. Written statement was filed by defendant no.2 on 8.7.2008. Since none appeared on behalf...
Yash Pal Sapra Vs. Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee Rohini Court
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1131/2014 YASH PAL SAPRA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahipal Singh Rajput, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus LAWYERS CHAMBERS ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE ROHINI COURT COMPLEX AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate for respondent No.1. Reserved on :17. h February, 2014 Date of Decision :24. h March, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: CM Appl. 2355/2014 (Exemption) in W.P.(C) 1131/2014 Allowed, subject to just exceptions. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1131/2014 & CM Appls. 2354 & 2356/2014 1. Present writ petition has been filed primarily challenging the order dated 22nd January, 2014 passed by respondent No.1- Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee as well as praying for allotment of a chamber at Rohini Courts complex. The relevant portion of the impugned order dated 22nd January, 2014 reads as under:- A further perusal of the legal diaries, copies ...
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Vs. Roshan Lal S/O Late Sh. Ba ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on March 18, 2014 Judgment Delivered on March 24, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3127/1999 ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rishab Kaushik, Advocate versus ROSHAN LAL S/O LATE SH. BABU LAL AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: + None W.P.(C) 3476/1999 ROSHAN LAL S/O SH. LATE SH. BABU LAL AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Represented by: None versus THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Rishab Kaushik, Advocate for R2/AIIMS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The above captioned writ petitions arise from the award dated January 11, 1999, whereby the Labour Court has answered the reference, directing the reinstatement of the workman without back wages.2. For convenience, the facts are culled out from the W.P.(C) No.3127/1999 filed by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS, in short). It is noted that the respondent No.1 has since expire...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Consolidated Capital Financials Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2158/2012 & I.A. No.12981/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL FINANCIALS LTD ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 28th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.86,38,732/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12981/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 28th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the A...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Chhote Lal Prasad and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 1190/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Adv. Versus CHHOTE LAL PRASAD & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Srikant Prasad and Mr. Janme Jay, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. In view of the detailed order passed today in MAC. Appeal No.152/2014, the present appeal is dismissed.2. Consequently, the statutory amount be released in favour of the appellant and the remaining compensation amount with up-to-date interest accrued thereon be released in favour of the respondents / claimants in terms of award dated 18.08.2012 on taking necessary steps by them. CM. No.19233/2012 Dismissed as infructuous. SURESH KAIT, J.MARCH24 2014 Jg/RS...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Stock Land Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2093/2012 & I.A. No.12770/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus HINDUSTAN STOCK LAND LTD. ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.43,51,991/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12770/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was m...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Vinod Baid and Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2145/2012 & I.A. No.12947/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus VINOD BAID & CO Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 12th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.44,128/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12947/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 12th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the le...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A.K. Puri and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h March, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 196/2013 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. A.K. Soni, Adv. Versus A.K. PURI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Raman Duggal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. In view of the detailed order passed today in MAC. Appeal No.152/2014, the present appeal is dismissed.2. Consequently, the statutory amount be released in favour of the appellant and the remaining compensation amount with up-to-date interest accrued thereon be released in favour of the respondents / claimants in terms of award dated 05.11.2012 on taking necessary steps by them. SURESH KAIT, J.MARCH24 2014 Jg/RS...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Arora and Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2069/2012 & I.A. No.12714/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus ARORA & CO Through ..... Defendant Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 5th May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.3,95,939/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12714/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 5th May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the Award was made by the learned...
M/S Ms Shoes East Ltd. Vs. Hemdev Securities (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order delivered on: March 24, 2014 CS(OS) No.2070/2012 & I.A. No.12718/2012 M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Pavan Sachdeva, AR versus HEMDEV SECURITIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Defendant Through Defendant already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Section 14 & 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (in short, called the Act) with a prayer to pass a judgment in terms of the Award dated 23rd May, 2012 and decree the suit for Rs.47,89,603/- with future interest @ 18% per annum till the date of realization of payment from the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff has also filed an application being I.A. No.12718/2012 under Section 28 of the Act seeking extension of time of arbitration proceedings from 20th August, 2007 till 23rd May, 2012, i.e. the date on which the A...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »