Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 49 of about 540 results (0.017 seconds)Amaninder Singh Verka Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:04. 02.2014 + W.P.(C) 3008/2012 AMANINDER SINGH VERKA ..... PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... RESPONDENTS ADVOCATES WHO APPEARED IN THIS CASE: For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajiv Manglik and Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Advocates For the Respondents: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. for R-1 Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra and Ms. Bhavna Dhami, Advocates for R-2 CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 The petitioner, is aggrieved by the manner in which the recruitment of trainee pilots, has been made by respondent no.2, in particular, in so far as, it impacts him. 1.1 The petitioner, is admittedly a Scheduled Caste (SC) candidate, who had pursuant to a recruitment drive, carried out by respondent no.2, participated in the process. The petitioner was, however, declared unsuitable for the reason that, he had secured in the interview 35.2 marks out of a total of 60 marks; whereas in his category i.e., SC c...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Royal Palace in Hotel Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. M.C. NO.4054/2012 & CRL.M.A. NO.19281/2012 Reserved on:23. d January, 2014 % Date of Decision:4. h February, 2014 M/S ROYAL PALACE IN HOTEL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria & Mr. Prakash Chand Sharma, Adv. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Karan Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( for short `Cr.P.C.) the petitioner seeks quashing of complaint case No.2506/1/10 titled as M/s Ali Trading Exposition vs. M/s Royal Place in Hotel.2. Briefly stating the facts of the case are that respondent No.2 herein filed a complaint for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short `the Act) against the petitioner on the allegations, inter alia, that in the month of November, 2008 the petitioner herein approached the respondent/complainant for p...
Tag this Judgment!Balbir Singh @ Bawa Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$-7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :4. h FEBRUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 1081/2012 & CRL.M.B.No.2453/2013 BALBIR SINGH @ BAWA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukesh Kalia, Advocate with Mr.Karan Sachdeva, Advocate. versus STATE, NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Manoj Kumar, PS Punjabi Bagh. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. On 05.07.2009, Daily Diary (DD) No.7-A recorded at PS Punjabi Bagh, Delhi, set the police machinery into motion. They came to know that Sunil Chauhan was admitted at MGS hospital, Punjabi Bagh, Delhi, by PCR. The Investigation Officer lodged First Information Report after recording Sunil Chauhans statement. He disclosed that on 05.07.2009 at about 02.00 A.M. when he was going on his motorcycle and reached at red light in front of Alka Kori Restaurant, two boys on motorcycle stopped it in front of his motorcycle. In the meanwhile, two more boys also arrived there and surrounded him. Two of the...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Rasheed Vs. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :6. h DECEMBER, 2013 DECIDED ON :4. h FEBRUARY, 2014 + AND + CRL.A. 479/2000 MOHD. RASHEED ....Appellant Through : Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav & Mr.Lokesh , Advocates. versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A. 566/2000 MOHD. ARFEEN & ANR. ....Appellants Through : Mr.K.B.Andley, Sr.Advocate with Mr.M.L.Yadav & Mr.Lokesh , Advocates. versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeals stand disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.492/2000 titled Sagar Takwal vs. The State (Delhi Admn.) Delhi. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE FEBRUARY04 2014/TR...
Tag this Judgment!Prem Kumar @ Kalu and anr. Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:04. 02.2014 + CRL. A. No.1516 of 2013 PREM KUMAR @ KALU & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 31.1.2008, the complainant, Praveen Kumar, came to police post Rajinder Nagar and lodged a complaint Ex.PW2/A. The complainant alleged that on 30.1.2008, he got down from a rickshaw near police station and was thereafter going on foot to his house. At about 9:45 p.m., when he reached New Rohtak Road, opposite Lal Sons Jewellers, he was stopped by 3-4 boys who were standing there. One of them caught him from his back whereas another boy put a toy pistol on his chest. The remaining boys snatched the bag which he was carrying in his hand, which contained his laptop, cash amounting to Rs.16,000/-, and his mobile phone, make J600 touch screen Samsung bearing No.98187...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd Israr Qureshi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:03. 02.2014 Date of Decision:04. 02.2014 CRL.A. 1276/2010 MOHD ISRAR QURESHI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Mr. Jatin Rajut and Mr. Anupam Advs. versus STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Mr. Jatin Rajut and Mr. Anupam Advs. CRL.A. 1283/2010 AKMAL HUSSAIN versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 27.11.2002, on receipt of copy of DD No.17A, ASI Samsuddin of Police Station Shakarpur, reached House no.145, Bank Enclave, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, where the complainant Smt.Suman Bansal was present. In her complaint, Smt.Bansal alleged that on the aforesaid date, she was sleeping in her bedroom and her servants, namely Raju, Lalan and Arvind, were present in the house. At about 1.15 pm, she got up on hearing some sound and found a boy aged about 20-2...
Tag this Judgment!Akmal HussaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:03. 02.2014 Date of Decision:04. 02.2014 CRL.A. 1276/2010 MOHD ISRAR QURESHI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Mr. Jatin Rajut and Mr. Anupam Advs. versus STATE + Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Mr. Jatin Rajut and Mr. Anupam Advs. CRL.A. 1283/2010 AKMAL HUSSAIN versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 27.11.2002, on receipt of copy of DD No.17A, ASI Samsuddin of Police Station Shakarpur, reached House no.145, Bank Enclave, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, where the complainant Smt.Suman Bansal was present. In her complaint, Smt.Bansal alleged that on the aforesaid date, she was sleeping in her bedroom and her servants, namely Raju, Lalan and Arvind, were present in the house. At about 1.15 pm, she got up on hearing some sound and found a boy aged about 20-2...
Tag this Judgment!Zeeshan Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:04. 02.2014 + CRL.A. 92/2010 ZEESHAN Through: ..... Appellant Counsel for the appellant. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 13.05.2013, SI Rajesh Kumar of Special Staff received a secret information that a person named Zeeshan, who had absconded from the custody of U.P. Police, was involved in a number of serious offences committed in Delhi and keeps a deadly weapon with him shall come to a DDA Park Gate, near Arya Nagar Apartment, Road No.54A, I.P. Extension, Patparganj between 4.00 to 4.30 PM. On receipt of the aforesaid information, a raiding party was organized, which reached the above-referred spot and took position there. Some passerby were requested to join the raiding party, but no one agreed, though two of them gave their names and addresses to the police party. At about 5.00 PM, the appellant Zeeshan was foun...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Srivastava Vs. Arun Nayyar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: February 4, 2014 + RC.REV. 88/2012 & C.M. No.3384/2012 SUNIL SRIVASTAVA Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Misra, Adv. versus ARUN NAYYAR Through ..... Respondent Mr.Abhas Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The petitioner by way of the present petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has assailed the eviction order dated 9th December, 2011, passed by Additional Rent Controller, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.2. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent filed an eviction petition against the petitioner in respect of two rooms alongwith kitchen, bathroom and toilet on the 2nd floor of property bearing No.12-A/38, WEA Karol Bagh, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as tenanted premises) which was let out to the petitioner by father of the respondent for residential purpose. The respondent alleged himself to be ...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:04. 02.2014 + CRL. A. No.492 of 2013 SANJAY Through: ..... Appellant Counsel for the Appellant. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(Oral) On 10.6.2004, the complainant, Kishan Dev Pathak, came to police station Shahdara and lodged an FIR, alleging therein that in the night intervening 9/10.6.2004, he hired an auto-rickshaw from Hanuman Mandir, Shahdara for going to his house. Two other persons were sitting on the passenger seat of the auto-rickshaw whereas one person was sitting with the driver. When the auto-rickshaw reached near Loni Road Tikona Park, the auto-rickshaw was got stopped and the other passengers who were sitting on the passenger seat of the auto-rickshaw alighted from the vehicle and sought to pay Rs.20/- to the auto-rickshaw driver, who demanded Rs.32/- as fare. On this both of them asked the auto-rickshaw d...
Tag this Judgment!