Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 53 of about 540 results (0.022 seconds)Anand @ Jat Vs. State (Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h JANUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :3. d FEBRUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 907/2013 & CRL.M.B. 1455/2013 ANAND @ JAT ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. RESERVED ON :23. d JANUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :3. d FEBRUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 1395/2012 & CRL.M.A.No.53/2014 SATISH @ MADRASI ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate. VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. AND RESERVED ON :27. h JANUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :3. d FEBRUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 703/2013 & CRL.M.B. 1097/2013 PARMOD MANDAL @ DHUKHO MANDAL Through : ..... Appellant Ms.Alpana Pandey, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Anand @ Jat (A-1), Satish @ Madrasi (A-2) and Parmod Mandal @ Dhukho Mandal (A-3) impugn their conviction by a judgm...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Lal Meena Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: January 30, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: February 03, 2014 + W.P.(C) 880/2002 RAM LAL MEENA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Manpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sushil Kumar Dubey, Advocate for Ms.Sonia Mathur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. We note the undisputed facts before noting the disputed ones.2. Having joined service as a Constable with CISF on July 15, 1994, for overstaying leave for a period of 17 days from June 03, 1996 to June 19, 1996, penalty of withholding one increment of pay for one year without cumulative effect was inflicted upon the petitioner. The next year, for overstaying leave for 13 days from February 21, 1997 till March 05, 1997, he was punished with three days pay being deducted as fine. Soon thereafter, for overstaying leave for 16 days fro...
Tag this Judgment!Gopal Alias Babbal Alias Pawan Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:28. 01.2014. Judgment delivered on:03.02.2014 CRL.A. 559/2001 & Crl.M.A. No.18/2011 GOPAL ALIAS BABBAL ALIAS PAWAN .... Appellant Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + .....Respondent Mr.Navin K. Jha, APP AND CRL.A. 632/2001 & Crl.M.A. No.2495/2005 HARISH Through: .... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Navin K. Jha, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellants Gopal @ Babbal @ Pawan and Harish are aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 30.07.2001 & 31.07.2001 respectively wherein the appellants had been convicted under Section 376 (2)(g)/324/506/34 of the IPC and each of them had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for 6 months for the offence under Section 376 (2)(g); for the offence und...
Tag this Judgment!Vimla Devi and ors. Vs. Manoj Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:3. d February, 2014 % + CM(M) 122/2014 VIMLA DEVI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Anshuman Bal, Advocate. Versus MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Respondent No.3/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.2156/2014 (for exemption) Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 122/2014 1. Notice issued.2. Mr.Pankaj Seth, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No.3/Insurance Company.3. Vide the instant petition, the petitioners are seeking release of the compensation amount lying deposited in the form of FDR in their joint name with State Bank of India, District Courts Rohini Branch, New Delhi.4. Vide order dated 07.01.2013, while awarding compensation for a sum of Rs.4,50,000/-, the learned Tribunal directed to deposit the said amount in the joint na...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Through Ministry of Railway Vs. Kalimata Ispat India (P ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.179/2012 3rd February, 2014 % UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF RAILWAY ..... Appellant Through: None. versus KALIMATA ISPAT INDIA (P) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ranny, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one was present for the appellant on the first call. No one is present for the appellant even on the second call although it is 2.30 P.M. I have therefore heard the counsel for the respondent and after perusing the record I am proceeding to decide the appeal.2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for setting aside the impugned order dated 17.12.2011 which has dismissed the objections filed by the appellant under Section 34 of the Act and upheld the Award dated 22.8.2006.3. The Award was passed with respect to the claim of the respondent herein f...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Manorma Grover and Others Vs. Smt. Ishwari Devi
Court: Delhi
$~40. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1381/2009 % Order dated 03.02.2014 SMT. MANORMA GROVER & OTHERS Through : ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Y.P. Ahuja, Adv. along with plaintiffs no.1 and 3. versus SMT. ISHWARI DEVI G+ Through : ..... Defendants Mr.Akshay Makhija, Ms.Mahima Bahl, Ms.Chandni Mehra and Mr.Rohitendra Deb, Adv. for Mr.H.L. Grover, legal heir of deceased defendant no1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for partition with respect to flat bearing no.26-A, DDA Flats, Phase-I, Masjid Moth, New Delhi.2. On the last date of hearing i.e. 29.1.2014, as agreed, a preliminary decree was passed defining the shares of the parties: (i) 75% falls to the share of the plaintiffs in the suit property; and (ii) 25% falls to the share of Sh.H.L. Grover, legal heir of defendant no.1, in the suit property.3. As per the valuation report, value of the flat, in question, is Rs.77.91 lakhs.4. Today, plaintiffs no.1 and ...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sarita Mishra and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.41/2014 3rd February, 2014 % NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. Versus SMT. SARITA MISHRA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.2207/2014 (condonation of delay) 1. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of one day in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.2208/2014 (condonation of delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 42 days in re- filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. + FAO No.41/2014 and C.M. No.2206/2014 (stay) 3. This first appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the insurance company, which was respondent no.3 before the Commissioner. Respondent no.3 was originally proceeded exparte. Thereafter it appeared through authorized r...
Tag this Judgment!Uoi and anr. Vs. Ram Chander Decd. Thr. Lr Maina Devi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % UOI & ANR. FAO No.134/2009 Through:3. d February, 2014 ......Appellants Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Adv. VERSUS RAM CHANDER DECD. THR. LR MAINA DEVI ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Pratima N. Chauhan, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal has been filed by the Union of India under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 impugning the order of the Commissioner dated 7.11.2008 by which compensation was granted on account of injuries to a casual workman Sh. Ram Chander who was working as a gangman with the Railways. I may note that Sh. Ram Chander has since expired and now he is being represented by his legal heirs.2. The impugned orders in this case are dated 7.11.2008 and the subsequent order dated 19.1.2009 enforcing the impugned judgment dated 7.11.2008.3. Before me, counsel for the appellant has argued two aspects. First is that ...
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Power Ltd Vs. Delhi State Electricity Workers Union and or ...
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 419/2012 % Judgment dated 03.02.2014 NORTH DELHI POWER LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Manish Srivastava, Adv. for Mr.K.Dutta, Adv. versus DELHI STATE ELECTRICITY WORKERS UNION & ORS..Defendants Through: Mr.Salim Inamdar, Mr.Vedanta Varma and Mr.Vibhor Kush, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent and mandatory injunction seeking a declaration that e-mail dated 14.02.2012 issued by defendant No.2 on behalf of defendant No.1 purported to be sent under Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act as illegal and void ab initio. The decree for permanent injunction was also sought in favour of plaintiff and against defendant No.1 from going on strike in future and further restraining the defendants from demonstrating, picketing, obstructing and barricading or from causing obstruction and impediment in the ingress and egress of plaintiff at their offices. Whil...
Tag this Judgment!Sbl Pvt Ltd Vs. V.B Shukla and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: February 03, 2014 + CS(OS) 1782/2012 SBL PVT LTD Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr.Manish Srivastava, advocate and Mr.S.R. Verma, Sr. Manager of plaintiff versus V.B SHUKLA & ORS Through: ..... Defendant Mr.J.C. Mahindroo, Advocate for D=1 Ms.Meenakshi Singh, Mr.Vikram Grover and Ms.Shreya Verma, Advs. for Ds=2-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) IA.No.2181/2014 This is an application filed by defendant nos.2 to 4 seeking correction in the order dated 15.1.2014. Counsel for the parties submit that this Court had adjourned the matter for 3.2.2014, but inadvertently the date is mentioned as 3.4.2014. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The date of 3.4.2014 is cancelled. CS(OS) 1782/2012 With the consent of counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for hearing today. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent and mandatory injunction alongwith damag...
Tag this Judgment!