Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 29 of about 540 results (0.021 seconds)Crosslay Remedies Ltd Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Mr. S.A. Siddiqui, Judicial Member” 1. Alleging deficiency of service, this complaint has been filed against OP, United India Insurance Company Ltd. for payment of compensation and damages to the tune of Rs. 22 Lac. 2. Relevant facts relating to this complaint are that the OP is a Limited Company incorporated under the Companies Act with its registered office at K-31, First Floor, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001. Complainant is also private company located at Sector-1, Vaishali, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201009. The OP entered into a contract with complainant for provision of health insurance services to complainant Directors/Employees, their dependents on 24.12.2008 (for the period of 19.12.2008 to 18.12.2009) for net premium of Rs. 5,18,012/-. The OP covered assured persons up to a limit of Rs. 1,65,00,000/- (Copy of Group Mediclaim Tailor made policy is annexure and marked as annexure 2 and receipt as annexure 3). The Tailor Made Policy issued by the OP was numbered as 040703...
Tag this Judgment!Aflaq Ahmad @ Babu Vs. State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$-8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :14. h FEBRUARY,2014 + CRL.A.No.1070/2011 SHAKILA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Habibur Rahman, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : AND + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Nitin, PS Gokalpuri. CRL.A.No.1517/2011 & CRL.M.B. 1389/2013 AFLAQ AHMAD @ BABU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Riaz Mohammad, Advocate. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Shakila (A-1) and Aflaq Ahmad @ Babu (A-2) were arrested in case FIR No.245/2007 under Sections 489B/489C IPC registered at PS Gokal Puri and sent for trial. Prosecution case as projected in the chargesheet was that on 11.01.2007, Insp. Yogesh Malhotra received a secret information at about 04.30 P.M. that one lady Shakila (A-1) was engaged in the business of buying and selling of fake currency notes in Mustafabad. Daily Diary (DD) No.8 was recorded in this ...
Tag this Judgment!Roche Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Drugs Controller General ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: February 14, 2014 + CS(OS) No.355/2014 ROCHE PRODUCTS (INDIA) PVT LTD & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Ms.Juhi Singh, Ms.Niti Dixit, Mr. Mahabir Neetiah, Ms.Shivani Singhal, Mr.Dhruv Agarwal, Ms.Samiksha Godiyal, Advs. versus DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Harish Salve, Sr. Adv. and Ms.Prathiba M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vijay Sondhi, Mr.Astush Prasad, Mr.Manu Yadav, Mr.Mayank Grover and Mr.Sohan Kumar, Advs. for D-2. Dr. A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Prag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Gytri Rai, Ms.Nirupum Lodha, Mr.Ankhush Mahajan, Mr.Udit Sood and Ms.Akanksha Singh, Advs. for D3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.2988/2014 & I.A. No.2990/2014 1. The plaintiffs in the above said matter filed the suit for injunction against the four defendants. Along with the su...
Tag this Judgment!Rasalika Trading and Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd Vs. Deputy Commissioner o ...
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. 02.2014 + W.P.(C) 1608/2013 & CM Appl.3024/2013 RASALIKA TRADING AND INVESTMENT CO. PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr Rakesh Gupta, Mr Rishabh Kapoor and Ms Khshbu Upadhyay, Advs. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ..... Respondent Through Mr Rohit Madan, Adv. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.: (OPEN COURT) The petitioner in this case challenges the notice proposing reassessment under section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act in respect of assessment year 2005-06. The assessee, an investment and security business company, had raised additional capital and offered shares at a premium of Rs.90 per share during the concerned assessment year. The regular assessment under section 143(3) was completed by an order framed on 24.12.2007. The notice proposing reassessment, in the present case reads as follows :ANNEXURE 'A' RASALIKA TRADING & INVESTMENT CO. PVT. LTD. 20...
Tag this Judgment!Shakila Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$-8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :14. h FEBRUARY,2014 + CRL.A.No.1070/2011 SHAKILA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Habibur Rahman, Advocate. VERSUS THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : AND + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Nitin, PS Gokalpuri. CRL.A.No.1517/2011 & CRL.M.B. 1389/2013 AFLAQ AHMAD @ BABU ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Riaz Mohammad, Advocate. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Shakila (A-1) and Aflaq Ahmad @ Babu (A-2) were arrested in case FIR No.245/2007 under Sections 489B/489C IPC registered at PS Gokal Puri and sent for trial. Prosecution case as projected in the chargesheet was that on 11.01.2007, Insp. Yogesh Malhotra received a secret information at about 04.30 P.M. that one lady Shakila (A-1) was engaged in the business of buying and selling of fake currency notes in Mustafabad. Daily Diary (DD) No.8 was recorded in this ...
Tag this Judgment!Bhola Shanker and ors. Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :13. h JANUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :14. h FEBRUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 24/2011 BHOLA SHANKER & ORS. ....Appellants Through : Ms. Neha Gupta, Advocate. versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Bhola Shanker (A-1) and Sher Singh (A-2) impugn a judgment dated 29.11.2010 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.221/2008 arising out of FIR No.1039/2007 PS Sultan Puri by which they were convicted under Section 304 part-II IPC. By an order on sentence dated 01.12.2010, they were awarded RI for five years with fine ` 5,000/-, each.2. Allegations against the appellants in the charge-sheet were that on 25.06.2007 at about 03.00 P.M. at Jhandewala park, P-1 Block jhuggi, Sultan Puri, they in furtherance of common intention inflicted injuries to Kailash Singh. The police machinery was set in motion when Daily Diary (DD) No.51B (Ex.PW-12/A) was recorded at ...
Tag this Judgment!Master Anil Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO No.21/2013 14th February, 2014 % MASTER ANIL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajiv Aneja, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This first appeal is filed under Section 47 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 impugning the judgment of the Guardianship Court dated 12.9.2012 which has dismissed the petition of the minor petitioner filed through his natural mother for sale of the share of the minor in the lands which are situated in village Mamoorpur, Narela, Delhi-110040. As per the valuation report, the share of the petitioner in the subject land would come to Rs.2,41,535/- plus Rs.1,04,895/-.2. Learned counsel for the appellant argues that the court below has committed an obvious illegality because there cannot be a better person for the minor than his own natural mother for taking care of the minor from the sale proceeds...
Tag this Judgment!Sundaram Finance Limited Vs. Rakesh Kumar and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO1942011& CM77262011(stay) % 14.02.2014 SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. K. Venkatraman, Advocate versus RAKESH KUMAR & ANR. Through ..... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. No one appears for the respondent No.1 in spite of service. Respondent No.1 has not been appearing even earlier and he was proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 26.3.2012.2. This first appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 impugning judgment of the court below dated 31.01.2011 which has allowed the objections by setting aside the impugned Award dated 18.3.2006 and remanded the matter to the arbitrator to decide afresh in accordance with law on the ground that the objector/respondent No.1 herein was allegedly not served in the arbitration proceedings.3. The relevant para of the impugned judgment is para 10 and which reads as ...
Tag this Judgment!Sh.Karan Singh and Others Vs. Sh. Gian Chand and Others
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA532008 % 14th February, 2014 SH.KARAN SINGH & OTHERS ......Appellants Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal and Mr. Rishab Kaushik, Advocates. VERSUS SH. GIAN CHAND & OTHERS Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.2573/2008 (delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RSA532008 1. This regular second appeal is filed impugning the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the trial court dated 7.8.2004 and the first appellate court dated 5.11.2005; by which the suit of the appellants-plaintiffs for declaration and injunction for cancelling of the registered sale deed dated 4.9.1989 executed by the appellants-plaintiffs in favour of defendant no.3 has been dismissed.2. Appellants-plaintiffs filed the subject suit stating that they alongwith the defendant nos. 1 and 2 (who are also brothers of the plaint...
Tag this Judgment!icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sonia and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % FAO No.234/2013 14th February, 2014 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ......Appellant Through: Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa and Ms. Harsh Lata, Advocates. VERSUS SMT. SONIA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. M.K.Rathee and Mr. J.P.Sikka, Advocates for R-1 to 6. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.8497/2013 (delay 25 days) For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned. CM stands disposed of. FAO2342013 & CM No.8498/2013(stay) 1 This first appeal is filed under Section 30 of the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (in short the Act) by the insurance company impugning the judgment dated 22.1.2001 by which the claim petition filed by the dependants of the deceased Sh. Rakesh Yadav, employee/driver, was allowed.2. The facts as pleaded in the claim petition were that the deceased Sh. Rakesh Yadav was employed with Gopi Chand, respondent no.1 before the...
Tag this Judgment!