Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satish Sharma Vs. Vrinda Realtors Ltd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 02.2014 CO. A (SB) 37/2013 & CA15102013 SATISH SHARMA ..... Appellant versus VRINDA REALTORS LTD AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Arvind Kumar Shukla and Mr Nihal Ahmad. For the Respondents : Mr Sarwas Raza and Mr Takrim Asan Khan. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present appeal has been filed by the appellant, under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking setting aside of the order dated 07.06.2013 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned order) passed by the Company Law Board. By the impugned order the Company Law Board has vacated the interim order passed on 01.08.2012 whereby the company was restrained from alienating the assets of the company.2. The principal question in the present appeal is whether the Company Law Board could vacate the interim order suo moto without any application making such prayer being filed by th...
Naushad @ Sonu Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:11. 02.2014 Date of Decision:17. 02.2014 CRL.A. 846/2013 HAMEED KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: State + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for CRL.A. 991/2013 NAUSHAD @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1162/2013 DILSHAD KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 02.09.2008, at about 4.56 PM, Police Station Seema Puri received information with respect to quarrel and injury near fish market. The information was recorded vide DD No.65B and its copy was handed over to ASI Harbhajan for necessary action. On receipt of the information, the aforesaid police officer reached the place of incident, opposite...
Vijay Rajan P. and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
$~R-91 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: February 17, 2014 + W.P.(C) 7630/2002 VIJAY RAJAN P. & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Anjana Gosain, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Desodya, Advocate and Mr.Bhupinder Sharma, Dy.Comdt./BSF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Section 115 and Section 116 of the BSF Act read as under:115. Transmission Security Force Courts- of proceedings of Summary The proceedings of every Summary Security Force Court shall, without delay, be forwarded to the officer nor below the rank of Deputy Inspector-General within whose command the trial was held, or to the prescribed officer, and such officer, or the Director-General or any officer empowered by him in his behalf may, for reasons based on the merits of the case, but not on merely technical...
Vikram @ Ganja Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : January 29, 2014 DECIDED ON : February 17, 2014 + CRL.A. 623/2012 VIKRAM @ GANJA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.V.K.Shukla, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by Vikram @ Ganja to challenge the legality of a judgment dated 30.03.2012 in Sessions Case No.122/11 arising out of FIR No.158/07 registered at Police Station Civil Lines by which he and his associates were held perpetrators of the crime under Section 395/397 IPC. By an order dated 03.04.2012, he was awarded RI for seven years with fine ` 5,000/- under Section 395 read with Section 397 IPC and in default of payment of fine to further undergo SI for five months.2. The prosecution case, in brief, as projected in the charge- sheet is that on 26.06.2007 at about 3.15 a.m., at outer ring road, near CNG Pump, Chandgiram Akhara, Delhi, the appellant and his...
Naresh Kumar Vs. the Director, All India Institute of Medical Scien
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on February 17, 2014 + W.P.(C) 1075/2014 NARESH KUMAR Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rama Shankar, Mr.S.Garg, Mr.Rakesh Mehta, Advocates versus THE DIRECTOR, ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES ..... Respondent Represented by: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.(Oral) CM No.2232/2014 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1075/2014 1. The challenge in this writ petition is to the award dated July 12, 2013 in I.D. No.232/2011 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi (Tribunal, in short), whereby the Tribunal has dismissed the Industrial Dispute, justifying the removal of the petitioner from the services of the respondent on account of unauthorized absence.2. The brief facts are, the petitioner was working as a Sanitary Attendant, Grade-II with the respondent. He was issued a charge sheet for absentin...
Directorate of Enforcement Vs. G.P. Poddar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 02.2014 Date of Decision:17. 02.2014 CRL.A. 352 of 2010 % + DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Subhash Bansal, Adv. versus A.K. MITTAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vivek Sibal & Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advs. + CRL.A. 353 of 2010 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Subhash Bansal, Adv. versus RAJASTHAN PETRO SYNTHETICS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Sibal & Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advs. + CRL.A. 354 of 2010 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Subhash Bansal, Adv. Versus G.P. PODDAR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vivek Sibal & Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.A memorandum dated 22.3.2002, was issued by the Special Director, Enforcement Directorate, to the reskpondents, Rajasthan Petro Synthetics Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company), Mr. G.P. Poddar, Managing Director of the Company, Mr. A.K. Mittal, Executive D...
Hameed Khan Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:11. 02.2014 Date of Decision:17. 02.2014 CRL.A. 846/2013 HAMEED KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: State + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for CRL.A. 991/2013 NAUSHAD @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1162/2013 DILSHAD KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 02.09.2008, at about 4.56 PM, Police Station Seema Puri received information with respect to quarrel and injury near fish market. The information was recorded vide DD No.65B and its copy was handed over to ASI Harbhajan for necessary action. On receipt of the information, the aforesaid police officer reached the place of incident, opposite...
Directorate of Enforcement Vs. Rajasthan Petro Synthetics Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 02.2014 Date of Decision:17. 02.2014 CRL.A. 352 of 2010 % + DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Subhash Bansal, Adv. versus A.K. MITTAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vivek Sibal & Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advs. + CRL.A. 353 of 2010 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Subhash Bansal, Adv. versus RAJASTHAN PETRO SYNTHETICS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Sibal & Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advs. + CRL.A. 354 of 2010 DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Subhash Bansal, Adv. Versus G.P. PODDAR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vivek Sibal & Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGEMENT V.K.JAIN, J.A memorandum dated 22.3.2002, was issued by the Special Director, Enforcement Directorate, to the reskpondents, Rajasthan Petro Synthetics Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Company), Mr. G.P. Poddar, Managing Director of the Company, Mr. A.K. Mittal, Executive D...
Dilshad Khan Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:11. 02.2014 Date of Decision:17. 02.2014 CRL.A. 846/2013 HAMEED KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: State + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for CRL.A. 991/2013 NAUSHAD @ SONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: + Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CRL.A. 1162/2013 DILSHAD KHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Riaz Mohd, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 02.09.2008, at about 4.56 PM, Police Station Seema Puri received information with respect to quarrel and injury near fish market. The information was recorded vide DD No.65B and its copy was handed over to ASI Harbhajan for necessary action. On receipt of the information, the aforesaid police officer reached the place of incident, opposite...
Sanwar @ Razzak Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : February 04, 2014 DECIDED ON : February 17, 2014 + CRL.A. 1579/2011 SANWAR @ RAZZAK Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. VERSUS STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. SI Jaibir, PS Alipur. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by Sanwar @ Razzak to challenge the legality of a judgment dated 15.11.2011 in Sessions Case No.60/08 arising out of FIR No.72/08 registered at Police Station Alipur by which he and his associates were held perpetrators of the crime under Section 395/398 IPC. The appellant was also convicted under Section 27 Arms Act. By an order dated 19.11.2011, he was awarded RI for eight years with fine ` 2,000/- under Section 395/398 IPC and RI for three years under Section 27 Arms Act. Both the sentences were to run concurrently.2. The prosecution case in brief as projected in the charge-sheet was that on the night intervening 03/04.04.2008, Sanjeev...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »