Delhi Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravinder Kumar, New Delhi Vs. Union of India, Through the Home Secreta ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
Syed Rafat Alam, Chairman, J. 1. This is an Application under Section 22(3)(f) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking review of the order dated 23.5.2012 passed in OA No. 313/2010. 2. It appears that the applicant being aggrieved by the charge memo dated 28.03.1995 and the order of the disciplinary authority dated 13.08.2009 inflicting punishment of compulsory retirement from service in terms of rule 6 (1) of the All India Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969, filed aforesaid OA seeking following reliefs: a). Quash and set aside the impugned Memorandum dated 28.03.1995 (Annexure A-1) as illegal and non est ab initio or deem it lapsed in view of the Tribunal order dated 26.11.2002. b). Quash and set aside the impugned orders inquiry report as also the impugned order of punishment dated 13.08.2009 as illegal and non est. c). to pass Orders directing the Respondents to reinstate the applicant along with all consequential benefits. d). Award exemplary costs in favour of t...
Manohar Singh Chana, Ex. Acio-ii (Tech/ib), New Delhi Vs. Union of Ind ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2014
Dr. B.K. Sinha, Member (A). 1. The instant dispute relates to reckoning of the services rendered by the applicant during his employment with the Indian Navy for the purpose of retiral and other consequential benefits. The applicant has filed this OA before this Tribunal when his repeated representations produced no result. The applicant has sought mainly the following reliefs:- (a). Allow the present Original Application filed by the applicant and issue directions to the respondents for grant of ex-servicemens benefits (initial pay fixation on jointing IB and counting of Naval service towards civil pension etc.) by taking cognizance of Certificate of Verification of Military Service of Ex-Sailor issued by previous employer, i.e., Indian Navy along with all consequential benefits including, interest @ 18% (p.a) on the arrears of above; (b).Award interest @18% for 3 years on the amounts of Rs.34,751/-(Rupees Thirty Four Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty One only) and Rs.59,097/- (Rupees Fifty...
Living Media India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Alpha Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No.21490/2012 in CS(OS) 3350/2012 Date of Decision:19. h February, 2014 + # LIVING MEDIA INDIA LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Chander Lal, Mr. Sajad Sultan & Ms. Nancy Roy, Advocates VERSUS $ * ALPHA DEALCOM PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Tanmaya Dhari Sinha, Ms. Kanika Sinha & Mr. Ankit Bhatnagar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: The two plaintiff Companies, out of whom plaintiff no.2 Company is the subsidiary and sister concern of plaintiff no.1 Company, have filed this suit against the defendants for infringement of their trade marks and passing off action.2. The averments made by the plaintiffs in different paragraphs of their plaint and which only are relevant for deciding this application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and in respect of which only arguments were advanced at the time of hearing of this application are re-produced bel...
Mohd. Rafiq Vs. State (Govt of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :19. h February, 2014 + CRL.A. 360/2012 & CRL.M.B.268/2014 MOHD. RAFIQ ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal with Mr.Feroj, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Mohd.Rafiq (the appellant) was convicted by a judgment dated 17.12.2011 in Sessions Case No.21/11 arising out of FIR No.11/11 registered at Police Station NDRS for committing offence under Section 392/397 IPC and was awarded rigorous imprisonment for seven years with fine `10,000/-.2. Allegations against the appellant were that on 16.01.2011 at around 10.00 a.m. at NDRS, he robbed the complainant- Naushad Ali of his mobile using a sharp weapon. After the complainant raised an alarm, Chor Chor, the appellant was apprehended by police officials on patrolling duty. The mobile phone and the sharp weapon was recovered from the accused. The Investigating O...
Kafil Ahmad Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :18. h FEBRUARY, 2014 DECIDED ON :19. h FEBRUARY, 2014 + CRL.A. 34/2013 KAFIL AHMAD ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. AND + CRL.A. 641/2013 AMIT ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeals stand disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.1477/2011 titled Muslim @ Salim vs. The State (NCT of Delhi). (S.P.GARG) JUDGE FEBRUARY19 2013/ tr...
Om Prakash Singhal Vs. K.L. Kurian
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2014. + CS(OS) 1433/2012 & IA No.9528/2012 (u/O15 r/w 151 CPC) OM PRAKASH SINGHAL Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. A.K. Singhla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepak R. Dahiya, Adv. Versus K.L. KURIAN ..... Defendant Through: Mr. D.C. Yadav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The pleadings have been completed and the suit is ripe for framing of Issues if any.2. The senior counsel for the plaintiff states that on the defence contained in the written statement, no material question of law and fact arises for adjudication and the suit, insofar as for the relief of possession can be decreed immediately.3. The counsels have been heard on the said aspect.4. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of possession from the defendant of flat No.G-4 in the multi-storied building situated at DD-36, Kalkaji, New Delhi and for recovery of mesne profits, pleading: (a) that the plaintiff is the sole absolute owner o...
Babli Vs. Roop Lal and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. h February, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.505/2008 BABLI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sunil Kumar Verma, Advocate. Versus ROOP LAL & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocate for Respondent No.2/Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 17.05.2008, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for an amount of Rs.5,78,000/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, the appellants are seeking enhancement of the compensation amount as noted above.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has argued that the claimants have examined PW4 Shri Vinod Kumar from the employer of the deceased before the learned Tribunal, who stated that deceased Kamal Chopra was working as a S...
M/S Delhi-gurgaon Super Connectivity Ltd. Vs. National Highway Authori ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order pronounced on: February 19, 2014 O.M.P. No.288/2013 M/S DELHI-GURGAON SUPER CONNECTIVITY LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Akhil Sibal, Adv. with Ms.Meghna Mishra, Mr.Premtosh Mishra, Mr.Jatin Mongia & Ms.Manmeet Kaur, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Mr.Tavinder Sidhu, Ms.Meenakshi Sood & Ms.Tanu Priya Gupta, Advs. for R-1 along with Mr.K.Venkatraman, CGM, NHAI in person. Mr.Pinaki Misra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Arjun Pant, Adv. for R-2 along with Mr.Sanjay Grewal, Authorized Signatory of IDFC in person. Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mrs.Biji Rajesh, Adv. for SDMC. Mr.Manjit Singh, Addl. AG with Mr.Vikas Sharma & Ms.Nupur Chaudhary, Advs. for State of Haryana. + Ex. P. No.88/2013 I.D.F.C. LTD. & ORS Through OMP No.288/2013 & Ex. P. No.88/2013 ..... Decree Holders Mr.Arjun Pant, Mr.Ajit Warrier, Mr.Aashish Gupta & Ms.Tarunima Vijra, Advs. along ...
i.D.F.C. Ltd. and ors. Vs. M/S. Delhi-gurgaon Super Connectivity Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Order pronounced on: February 19, 2014 O.M.P. No.288/2013 M/S DELHI-GURGAON SUPER CONNECTIVITY LTD ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Akhil Sibal, Adv. with Ms.Meghna Mishra, Mr.Premtosh Mishra, Mr.Jatin Mongia & Ms.Manmeet Kaur, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Mr.Tavinder Sidhu, Ms.Meenakshi Sood & Ms.Tanu Priya Gupta, Advs. for R-1 along with Mr.K.Venkatraman, CGM, NHAI in person. Mr.Pinaki Misra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Arjun Pant, Adv. for R-2 along with Mr.Sanjay Grewal, Authorized Signatory of IDFC in person. Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr.Adv. with Mrs.Biji Rajesh, Adv. for SDMC. Mr.Manjit Singh, Addl. AG with Mr.Vikas Sharma & Ms.Nupur Chaudhary, Advs. for State of Haryana. + Ex. P. No.88/2013 I.D.F.C. LTD. & ORS Through OMP No.288/2013 & Ex. P. No.88/2013 ..... Decree Holders Mr.Arjun Pant, Mr.Ajit Warrier, Mr.Aashish Gupta & Ms.Tarunima Vijra, Advs. along ...
Rakesh Kapoor Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.A. No.134 of 2008 Reserved on: February 6, 2014 Decision on: February 19, 2014 RAKESH KAPOOR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Puneet Mittal with Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Ankur Aggarwal and Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: .... Respondents Mr.Anupam Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Vineet Malhotra, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Subhash Bansal with Mr. Shashwat, Advocates for Directorate of Enforcement. Crl.A. No.138 of 2008 RAJEEV WADHWA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Puneet Mittal with Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Ankur Aggarwal and Mr. Ankit Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: CRL. A. Nos. 134, 138 & 188 of 2008 .... Respondents Mr. Anupam Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Vineet Malhotra, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Subhash Bansal with Mr. Shashwat, Advocates for Directorate of Enforcement. Page 1 of 15 Crl.A. No.188 of 2008 ARUN SHARMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. H.S.Bhullar with Ms. Safia Gupta and Ms. Rajyashree Banerjee, Advocates. ve...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »