Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suyash Manocha and Anr. Vs. State and Anr. (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5485/2014 SUYASH MANOCHA & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Veena Ralli, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR.(NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Azad Singh, PS Ashok Vihar. Mr. Ravin Rao, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % ORDER0212.2014 Crl. M.A. 18720/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5485/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.328/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Ashok Vihar on 22nd October, 2013 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Ravin Rao, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of the State/respon...
Vasdev Sachdeva Vs. J and K Horticultural Produce Mkt and Processing C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3909/1992 Decided on :02. 12.2014 s IN THE MATTER OF VASDEV SACHDEVA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. S.S. Dahiya and Mr. L.K. Dahiya, Advocates. versus J & K HORTICULTURAL PRODUCE MKT & PROCESSING CORPN.LTD.& ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr. V.K. Dhar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia that the respondent/Jammu & Kashmir Horticultural Produce Marketing & Processing Corporation Limited be directed to regularize his services on the post of Marketing Assistant w.e.f. 13.10.1987, the date of his appointment, on a regular basis and to pay him the same salary and allowances as are being paid to similarly placed employees, along with consequential benefits.2. Notice was issued on the present petition on 5.11.1992 and Rule was issued on 28.9.1993. On 3.11.1999, learned counsel for the respondents had stated that the respondent/manag...
Senior Citizens Forum Through Its Vice President M Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 4777/2012 & CM No.9884/2012 (for directions) SENIOR CITIZEN'S FORUM THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT M.M.S. RANA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma & Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avneesh Garg, Advs. for R-3 to R-5. Mr. K. Raghavcharyulu with Mr. Kailash Pandey, Mr. Ranjeet Singh & Ms. Arunima Pal, Advs. for R-6. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), alleges, (i) that aviation fuel has to be tested to ensure that the water content in the same is within the prescribed norms and standards; (ii) such testing has to be done at various stages i.e. at the laboratory of the Oil Company, at the storage facility of the Oi...
Sh. Gulshan Arora Vs. M/S Pomey Plastic Works (a Partnership Firm)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RC.REV.No.211/2014 2nd December, 2014 % SH. GULSHAN ARORA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Manuj Aggarwal, Advocate. VERSUS M/S POMEY PLASTIC WORKS (A PARTNERSHIP FIRM) ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Though this petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) however it ought to have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India since it is a petition filed against ordering of fresh summons upon the respondent/tenant and a revision can be filed under Section 25B(8) of the Act only against the dismissal of a leave to defend. Therefore, the present petition is treated as a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the petitioner/landlord impug...
Rajinder Kumar Mittal Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,deihi-I
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
$~1 to 3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE No.102/2014 Date of decision:2. d December, 2014 RAJINDER KUMAR MITTAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Gopalia, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,DEIHI-I ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik & Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Advocates. CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE No.103/2014 M/S PARVEEN TOBACCO CO PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Gopalia, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-I, ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik & Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Advocates. CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE No.104/2014 PARVEEN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Gopalia, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,DEIHI-I ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik & Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWA...
Jasvinder Singh and Ors Vs. Lovkush Giri and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
$~A-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. 12.2014 + MAC.APP. 884/2011 JASVINDER SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms.Shinjan Jain, Advocate versus LOVKUSH GIRI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.K.L.Nandwani, Advocate for R-3. Mr.J.S.Arora, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the Award dated 18.3.2011 and seeks enhancement of compensation.2. The brief facts are that on 03.10.2006 Shri Harjeet Singh while working in front of import and export examination area, ICD, Tughlakadbad, Okhla Phase-I, New Delhi was hit by a crane driven by respondent No.1. On account of the accident he suffered grievous injuries and succumbed to the same.3. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal concluded that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of respondent No.1.4. On compensation a total compensation of Rs.9,50,000/- was aw...
K Sridharan and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5455/2014 K SRIDHARAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. G. Sivabala Murugan, Mr. Anis Mohammad, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with SI Hasrat Ali, CAW Cell, East Delhi, PS Mayur Vihar Mr. Vineet Mehta & Mr. Ankur Gupta, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 18631/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.A. 18632/2014 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay, which is stated to be of 34 days in re-filing the petition, is condoned. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5455/2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.315/2012 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Mayur ...
Centravis Production Ukraine Vs. Gallium Industries Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 11.2014 Judgment delivered on:02. 12.2014 % + EX. P. 275/2011 CENTRAVIS PRODUCTION UKRAINE ..... Decree Holder Versus GALLIUM INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Judgement Debtor Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Decree Holder: Mr Amit Bansal, Ms Manisha Singh & Ms Senjul Khanna, Advocates. For the Judgement Debtor: Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.EA(OS) 134/2012 (Objections by judgement debtor) 1. These are objections filed by the judgement debtor. By these objections the prayer made is that the execution petition No.275/2011 filed by the decree holder to enforce the foreign award dated 31.03.2011, which has morphed into a decree, be dismissed. 1.1 By order dated 09.05.2012, both the execution petition, as well as the objections filed by the judgement debtor represented by the captioned application, were disposed of in view of the fact that the aforementioned a...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Krishan Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on July 24, 2014 Judgment delivered on December 02, 2014 + ITA502000 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Versus + SHRI KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Respondent ITA692004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Versus M/S SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD... Respondent + ITA4572004 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Versus M/S SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD... Respondent + ITA4602004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD... Respondent + ITA5242004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD... Respondent + ITA5762008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI..... Appellant versus SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel for appellant/revenue. Mr. Ajay Vohra,Sr.Adv. with Ms Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates for respondent/assessee. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'...
Tarun Vikram Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:2. d December, 2014 + CRL.A. 1336/2011 TARUN VIKRAM Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K. Singhal with Mr. Shashi Mohan, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The challenge in this appeal is to the judgment dated 26.09.2011 and order on sentence 27.09.2011 by which the appellant was convicted under Sections 307 of Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC) and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine, further six (6) months simple imprisonment. The appellant was also given the benefit of the provisions of Section 428 of Cr.P.C.2. Facts germane to the Prosecution case succinctly stated are as follows:On 17.09.2004 at about 12:30 AM, Investigating Officer SI Rajnikant received DD No.3A Ex. PW18A to the effect that someone ...
- ‹ Prev
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- Next ›
- Last »