Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Bakhtawar Singh S/O Sh. Sarmukh Singh Vs. Bakhtawar Singh S/O Late Haz ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM(M) No.1068/2014 4th December , 2014 BAKHTAWAR SINGH S/O SH. SARMUKH SINGH Through: ......Petitioner Mr. J.S.Mehra, Advocate. VERSUS BAKHTAWAR SINGH S/O LATE HAZOOR SINGH Through: ...... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the trial court dated 22.9.2014 by which the trial court has dismissed the application for amendment filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) on the ground that if the amendment as prayed for is allowed, it will amount to setting up by the petitioner/plaintiff of a totally new case and which will in fact be contradictory to the stand as set up in the existing pleadings.2. The subject suit was a suit for declaration, mandatory and permanent injunction filed by the petitioner/plaintiff claiming that...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Om Prasad SarIn and Anr. Vs. Sh. Ajit Mehra and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV.No.266/2012 & C.M.Nos.10945/2012, 17918/2013, 8628/2014, 8629/2014 % 04th December, 2014 SH. OM PRASAD SARIN & ANR. ......Petitioners Through: Mr.R.P.Sharma Advocate. VERSUS SH. AJIT MEHRA & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr.Pramod Kumar Singhal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 09.12.2011 by which the ARC has dismissed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed by the petitioners/landlords with respect to the suit/tenanted premises comprising of five rooms, one drawing room, two kitchens on the ground floor and one tin shed on the first floor of property bearing no.4538, Daiwara, Nai Sarak, Delhi-6 as shown in red colour in the site plan ...
Tag this Judgment!Akeel Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
$~9,10,13, 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 04, 2014 + CRL.A. 1094/2014 NASIR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Ashok Verma, Advocate versus THE STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Vijay Kumar, P.S.Vivek Vihar CRL.A. 1121/2014 RAJ KUMAR @ JHUMRU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajat Agnihotri, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Vijay Kumar, P.S.Vivek Vihar CRL.A. 1374/2014 KALE Represented by: CRL.A. Nos. 1094, 1121, 1374 & 1459 of /2014 ..... Appellant Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Ashok Verma, versus THE STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Vijay Kumar, P.S.Vivek Vihar CRL.A. 1459/2014 AKEEL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Azhar Qayum, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the ...
Tag this Judgment!Virender Bidhuri Vs. The State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.701 of 2014 & CRL.M.B. No.1197 of 2014 VIRENDER BIDHURI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. F.A. Khan, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for State. Mr. S.K. Rungta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER0412.2014 Introduction 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 23rd May 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Criminal Appeal No.56 of 2013 filed by Respondent No.2 seeking setting aside an order dated 30th August 2013 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) South-East in the case arising out of FIR No.40/05 registered at Police Station (PS) Sarita Vihar whereby while holding him guilty of the offence under Section 379 IPC, the learned MM had ordered release of the Appellant herein on probation of good conduct given him the benefit of Sectio...
Tag this Judgment!Haryana State Small Industries and Export Corporatio Vs. Association o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgement delivered on:04. 12.2014 + O.M.P. 412/2012 HARYANA STATE SMALL INDUSTRIES & EXPORT CORPORATION LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Satinder Singh Gulati, Adv. versus ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATION AND APEX SOCIETIES OF HANDLOOMS (ACASH) ..... Respondent Through: Mr Neeraj Malhotra & Mr Prithu Garg, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J1 This is a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act), whereby challenge is laid to the award dated 26.12.2011.2. Shorn of verbiage, the grievance of the petitioner is that, the learned arbitrator has, in the award, while in a sense accepted its claims, the claims, however, have been made contingent upon the result of a pending arbitration proceeding between the respondent and the State of Bihar. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that not only the award vis-a-vis the main claim, as also the interest sought, has been m...
Tag this Judgment!Mohar Pal and Ors Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3210/2014 MOHAR PAL & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. S.K. Dugal, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for the State with SI Megh Raj, PS Badar Pur. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % 1. ORDER0412.2014 This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.43/2003 registered under Sections 341/323/326/34 IPC at Police Station Badarpur on 26th January, 2003 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Complainant-Amit Kumar and injured-Vinod Kumar along with petitioners are present in person. They are also identified by the Investigating Officer/ Sub-Inspector Megh Raj, Police Station Badar Pur.4. It is stated that ...
Tag this Judgment!Sudarshan Kumar JaIn Vs. Mukta JaIn and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) Nos. 208/2013 & 211/2013 4th December , 2014 % + C.M(M) No.208/2013 SUDARSHAN KUMAR JAIN Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Rahul Kumar Srivastava, Advocate. VERSUS MUKTA JAIN & ANR. Through: + ...... Respondents Mr. Rajeev Pandey, Adv. for R-1. C.M(M) No.211/2013 SMT. BIMLA JAIN & ANR. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. Rahul Kumar Srivastava, Advocate. VERSUS MUKTA JAIN & ANR. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. Rajeev Pandey, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. These petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India are filed by the applicants under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the order of the trial court dated 7.1.2013 by which the trial court has dismissed the applications under Order I Rule 10 CPC.2. The applications under Order I Rule 10 CPC were filed in a suit for possession, recovery of rent etc against a...
Tag this Judgment!Vibhuti Sharma Vs. Management of Green Field Public School and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Cont. Cas. (C) No.845/2014 Decided on :04. h December, 2014 VIBHUTI SHARMA Through: Petitioner Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar & Ms. Ambreen Rasool, Advocates. Versus MANAGEMENT OF GREEN FIELD PUBLIC SCHOOL & ORS Respondents Through: Ms. Mamta Tandon for Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate for DOE. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition is premised on the wilful disobedience of the order dated 13.8.2009.2. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that by virtue of the aforesaid order, the petitioner was to be given the benefit of Sixth Pay Commission recommendations as well as the benefit of senior scale in terms of the undertaking filed by Dr. (Mrs.) M. Barsaley, Principal-cum-Manager, Green Field Public School, who is the respondent herein.3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel and have also gone through the order including the undertaking given by the Principal-cum-...
Tag this Judgment!Rajbir Singh and Ors. Vs. Vijay Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on :4. h December, 2014 + CS(OS) 2265/2012 RAJBIR SINGH & ORS. Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Prem Kishore Tripathi, Advocate & Mr. K.K. Sinha, Advocate versus VIJAY SINGH Through ..... Defendant Ms. Gita Dhingra, Advocate % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL G.P. Mittal, J.(Oral) CS(OS) 2265/2012 & I.A.13627/2012(O.XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC) 1. By virtue of this application under Order XXXIX Rules 1and 2 CPC, the Plaintiffs seek an ad interim injunction restraining Defendant Vijay Singh from selling, alienating or parting with possession of the suit property i.e. 1/3rd undivided share of deceased Bishan Singh in the joint holding i.e. agricultural land and residential houses upon gher and plots situated within the revenue estate of Village Goela Khurd and Kutabapur, New Delhi till the decision of the suit.2. This suit for declaration and permanent injunction has been filed by the Plaintiffs who are the sons and grand-son of Kushi R...
Tag this Judgment!Glaxo Group Limited and Anr. Vs. Indkus Drugs and Pharma Pvt. Ltd and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-04-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :14. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :4. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1841/2010 GLAXO GROUP LIMITED AND ANR. Through : ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Manav Kumar, Advocate. VERSUS INDKUS DRUGS & PHARMA PVT. LTD & ORS...... Defendants Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiffs have instituted the present suit for permanent injunction inter alia seeking to restrain the defendants from infringing its registered trademark BETNOVATE and infringement of copyright in the packaging pertaining thereto, passing off, delivery up and damages. The plaintiff No.1, viz. Glaxo Group Limited, is a company incorporated under the laws of United Kingdom. Plaintiff No.2 is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act. Plaintiff No.1 manufactures and markets various pharmaceuticals and medicinal preparations and healthcare products in India through its affiliate being plaintiff No.2.2. The plaintiffs submit that the present...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- Next ›
- Last »