Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lokesh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5554/2014 LOKESH KUMAR & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Ashok, S.Y. Usmani, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Rajvir Singh, P.S. Crime (Woman Cell). Mr. Rajesh, Advocate with R2/complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.18951/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.A. No.18952/2014 This application has been moved for condonation of delay, which is stated to be of 32 days in refiling the petition. For the reasons stated in this application, the same is allowed and the delay in refiling the petition is condoned. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5554/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.157/2013, registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at po...
Charan Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :02. 12.2014 Pronounced on :05. 12.2014 % + CRL.A. 1357/2012 CHARAN SINGH Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Deepak Vohra, Advocate. Versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The Appellant Charan Singh has spent almost five years in judicial custody apparently for the reason that he happened to fall in love with a girl who was Muslim. The girl was also in love with the Appellant and perhaps fearing opposition from the family to their intention to get married, she preferred to leave her home to marry the Appellant and live a contended life with the Appellant in his village. They had plans to educate their children despite the fact that they were illiterate persons residing in jhuggi cluster. However, their dreams could not come true as after her recovery from the village of the Appellant, though initially she wanted to live with the Appella...
Manpreet Singh Poonam Vs. Uoi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~13&14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:05. 12.2014 + W.P. (C) 8494/2014 MANPREET SINGH POONAM versus UOI AND ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents W.P. (C) 8516/2014 SURESH GUPTA versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Present: Mrs. Avnish Ahlwat, Advocate for petitioners in both cases. Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Arnab, Advocate in both cases. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate for UPSC in both cases. Ms. Ferida Satarawala, Advocate for R-3/GNCTD in item no.14. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice in both the matters. Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Mr. Naresh Kaushik, and Ms. Ferida Satarawala, Advocates accept notice on behalf of the respective respondents they are representing. With consent of counsel for parties both writ petitions were heard finally since the pleadings of the W.P.(C)8494 & 8516/2014 Page 1 Central Administrative Tribunal and relevant mater...
Junior Warrant officer D R Mundiyara Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 8527/2014, CM APPL. 19699/2014 JUNIOR WARRANT OFFICER D R MUNDIYARA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Piyush Kalra, Adv. with Mr. Krishna M. Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Vijay Kinger and Mr. Talvinder Kaur, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(Oral) 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 17.09.2014 passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the AFT), terming the same to be illegal and arbitrary. The petitioner also seeks directions to the respondents for payment of entire arrears, allowances, bonus etc. for the period 01.02.2010 to 14.12.2012 and that this period should be treated as a period spent on duty by the petitioner. The petitioner also seeks a direction to the ...
Delhi Urban Shelter Imrpovement Board Vs. Chet Ram Singh Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1391/2014 Judgment reserved on:12. 11.2014 Judgment pronounced on:05. 12.2014 DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMRPOVEMENT BOARD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate versus CHET RAM SINGH THR LRS Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) the petitioner has challenged the award dated 09.07.2014 passed against them. Vide that award the arbitrator has awarded a sum of Rs.70,62,530/- which included Rs.25 lakhs towards security deposit and Rs.45,62,530/- towards value of work done by the claimant along simple interest at the rate of 8% per annum with effect from 01.04.2005 till such time the petitioner pay this amount to the respondent claimant.2. The petitioner vide this petition has challenged the said award on two counts, first that the claim was barred by limitation and se...
Mohd.Ahmad HussaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02,2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A.438/2014 MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. CRL.A.1580/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. versus MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned decision dated December 14, 2013 Mohd.Ahmad Hussain has been held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 304 IPC (Part-I or Part-II not stated in the impugned decision); for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC; for the offence punishable under Se...
R.K. JaIn Vs. Chairman, Income Tax Settlement Commission and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 2939/2014 R.K. JAIN ..... Petitioner versus CHAIRMAN, INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajveer Singh. For the Respondents : Mr P. Roychaudhuri. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner, inter alia, impugns an order dated 14.02.2014 passed by respondent No.3 Central Public Information Officer & Administrative Officer, Income Tax Settlement Commission, denying the information, which was earlier directed to be supplied to the petitioner under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the RTI Act).2. The impugned order indicates that the order dated 26.09.2013 passed by respondent No.2 pursuant to an application filed by the petitioner under the RTI Act; and the order dated 21.10.2013 passed by respondent No.4 in an appeal preferred by the petitioner against the or...
State Vs. Mohd.Ahmad Hussain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02,2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A.438/2014 MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. CRL.A.1580/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. versus MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned decision dated December 14, 2013 Mohd.Ahmad Hussain has been held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 304 IPC (Part-I or Part-II not stated in the impugned decision); for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC; for the offence punishable under Se...
Muthurisapillai Ranganathan Vs. Indian National Science Academy and an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7062/2014 and CM APPL. 16566 & 16567/2014 Decided on :05. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF MUTHURISAPILLAI RANGANATHAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Nanda Devi Deka & Ms.Deepika Kalia, Advocates versus INDIAN NATIONAL SCIENCE ACADEMY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.K.N.Kataria, Sr.Advocate with Mr.K.P.Mavi, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Dev P.Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj and Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER0512.2014 % 1. Pursuant to the order dated 14.11.2014, the relevant documents have been filed by the petitioner.2. In the course of addressing arguments, Mr.Vikas Singh, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner fairly states that certain reliefs have to be added to the prayer clause for which the petition would have to be amended to lay the foundation of the relief and as the matter is still at the stage of admission, the petitioner may be permit...
Raju Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1048/2014 RAJU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Adv. with appellant in person. Versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp.Rajesh Kumar, PS Swaroop Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Raju was charged for committing the murder of Smt.Shashi Rai and firing upon Ajay thus causing bullet injuries on his person in furtherance of common intention with one A a juvenile. Vide impugned judgment dated July 16, 2014 the learned Trial Court has convicted Raju for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, 307/34 IPC and 25 Arms Act and has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine in sum of `50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and fine in sum of `50,000/- for...
- ‹ Prev
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- Next ›
- Last »