Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N.M. Goel Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 605/2012 Decided on :5. h December, 2014 N.M. GOEL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Arora, Mr.Akshat and Mr.Dhiraj Manchanda, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondent Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the order passed by the Division Bench of this court vide order dated 23.02.2012.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and I have also gone through the reply affidavit filed by the respondents including the surrejoinder. The direction passed by the Division Bench are contained in para Nos.5 & 6 of the order dated 23.02.2012. These were as under:5. In so far as the other plea with regard to the computation of the Cost of Living Allowance is concerned, we feel that the Tribunal has cursorily decided this issue against the petitioner, without going...
Nishant and Ors Vs. Fci and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7168/2014 Decided on 05.12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF : NISHANT & ORS Through: J.S. Bhasin with Ms. Rashmi Priya, Advocates ..... Petitioners versus FCI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate for FCI. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Advocate for UOI. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notices dated 10.06.2013 issued by the Regional Director (NR) of the respondent No.2/Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder they were informed that on failure to show cause, their candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.1/FCI, would be cancelled and they would be debarred for a period of five years from the Commissions examinations.2. With the consent...
Ravinder Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8562/2014 Decided on 05.12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF : RAVINDER KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. U. Srivastava, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, Advocate for UOI. Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate for R-4/FCI. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 10.06.2013 and the order dated 27.01.2014 issued by the respondent No.3/Regional Director (NR) of the Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder he was informed that his candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AGII) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.4/FCI was cancelled and he was debarred for a period of three years from the Commissions examinations.2. With the consent of the...
New Green Field Public School Vs. The Controlling Authority and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h December, 2014 % + WP(C) No.150/2002 NEW GREEN FIELD PUBLIC SCHOOL .. Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Garg & Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advs. Versus THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY & ORS. .. Respondents Through: None. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The petition impugns the order dated 18th July, 2001, of the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (Gratuity Act) in proceeding No.G21/2000/Sough Region/5675 initiated by the respondent No.3 Mrs. P. Satyavani, rejecting the preliminary objection raised by the petitioner of the said respondent No.3 employed as a Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) with the petitioner School being not an employee within the meaning of Section 2(e) of the Gratuity Act and resultantly, holding the proceeding initiated by the respondent No.3 Mrs. P. Satyavani to be maintainable and listing it for evidence.2. The petitioner preferred an appeal to the Appellate Authority under the Gratu...
Bhavneet Singh Vs. University of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8545/2014 and CM APPL. 19721-19722/2014 Decided on :05. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: BHAVNEET SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for R1 Ms. Senjul Khanna, Advocate for Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate for R-2/College . CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for directions to the respondent No.1/University and the respondent No.2/College to consider appointing him to the post of Administrative Officer of the respondent No.2/College, in terms of an advertisement dated 13.09.2013. Further, the petitioner seeks quashing/setting aside the decision to select the respondent No.3 to the subject post.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to an advertisement dated 13.09.2013 issued by the respondent No.2/College, vacancies ...
M/S Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd . Vs. M/S Bharat Sanchar ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on :05. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 1233/2014 & CM25722014 & 4641-4642/2014 M/S TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD . .... Petitioner versus M/S BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondents : : Mr Anil Sapra, Senior Advocate with Mr P.K.Bansal, Ms Rupali Kapoor, Mr Akshay Sapra, Mr Mridul Yadav, Advocates. Mr Sanjeev Narula & Mr Ajay Kalra, Advocates for BSNL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the respondents letter dated 27.01.2014, whereby the petitioners bid submitted on 10.01.2014, was returned.2. On 25.02.2014, when this matter came up for admission, this Court passed the following order:- The petitioner (M/s Telecommunications Consultants India Limited) is a wholly owned Government of India company. It had submitted its bid in respect of t...
Shri Kranti Kumar JaIn Vs. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure D ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 3086/2013 & CM No.5850/2013 SHRI KRANTI KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Pankaj Gupta. For the Respondents : Ms Renuka Arora. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns a notice dated 17.09.2012 issued by the DSIIDC (hereafter impugned notice) calling upon the petitioner to pay unearned increase charges amounting to ` 9,72,500/- as well as penalty charges at the rate of 18% per annum amounting to ` 87,285 (hereafter the impugned demand).2. The impugned demand was raised by the DSIIDC pursuant to a request made by the petitioner to record a change in the constitution of the firm, which was allotted the property in question.3. It is stated that the firm M/s Rosy Rubber Industries was constituted...
Satish Chand Gupta Vs. Mcd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :05. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 157/2011 SATISH CHAND GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. N. Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MCD AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 19.08.2009 in T.A. No.97/2009. They were aggrieved by the action of the respondent (MCD) in withdrawing their regularization orders.2. The petitioners case before the CAT was that they were originally working as daily wage employees at various places for the MCD when, on different dates between 2002 and 2003, orders of regularization were issued in respect of their employment. While so, alleging that there were large scale irregularities and scams - involving forgery and collusion with the officials of MCD, the petitioners service...
Rahul Mittal and Ors Vs. Payal Aggarwal and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5545/2014 RAHUL MITTAL & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Gurmit Singh, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus PAYAL AGGARWAL & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for the complainant with complainant in person. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Saurabh Kumar, PS CWC, Nanakpura. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 18936/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5545/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.105/2010 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Crime (Women) Cell on 8th July, 2010 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor enter appearanc...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Radha Nigam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* $~35 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. 12.2014 + MAC.APP. 1097/2014 & CM No.19914/2014 (stay) NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mridul Jain, Advocate versus RADHA NIGAM ..... Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CM No.19915/2014 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. MAC.APP. 1097/2014 & CM No.19914/2014 (stay) 1. By the present appeal the appellant seeks to impugn the award dated 09.09.2014. The brief facts giving rise to the claim petition are that on 14.03.2003 Shri Manish Nigam (deceased) along with his friends Shri Anish Jain, Shri Ansul Khandelwal and Shri Chhayan Gupta were travelling in Baleno car bearing no.DL-9CB-1071 which was being driven by Shri Manas Bansal in a rash and negligent manner. At about 11.55 PM the car reached Prithvi Raj Road. It collided with an ambassador car bearing No.DL-7CC-5301 as a result of which Shri Manish...
- ‹ Prev
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- Next ›
- Last »