Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arun Dhawan and Anr Vs. Lokesh Dhawan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:17. th October, 2014 Judgment pronounced on:05. th December, 2014 + CO. A(SB) 50/2013 ARUN DHAWAN & ANR ...APPELLANTS Through: Mr.Suhail Dutt, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikas Tiwari and Mr.Neeraj Gupta, Advocates Versus .RESPONDENT LOKESH DHA WAN Through: Mr.Ankit Sibal, Advocate CORA M: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1. This appeal arises out of order dated 18.9.2013 of the Company Law Board w hereby the Company Law Board while holding that the document, i.e., Resolution of Board of Directors dated 16.8.2010 filed by the Respondent (Petitioner in the Company Petition) was a forgery, refused to proceed further with the application filed by the Appellant (Respondent in the Company Petition) to initiate action and Respondent for perjury and contempt. CO. A(SB) 50/2013 prosecute the Law Board dismissed the application relying on the judgment of the Supreme Court in IQBAL SINGH M ARWAH V. M EENAKSHI M A...
Raju Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1048/2014 RAJU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Adv. with appellant in person. Versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp.Rajesh Kumar, PS Swaroop Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Raju was charged for committing the murder of Smt.Shashi Rai and firing upon Ajay thus causing bullet injuries on his person in furtherance of common intention with one A a juvenile. Vide impugned judgment dated July 16, 2014 the learned Trial Court has convicted Raju for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, 307/34 IPC and 25 Arms Act and has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine in sum of `50,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC; to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and fine in sum of `50,000/- for...
Deere and Co. and Anr. Vs. S. Harcharan Singh and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:5. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.3760/2014 DEERE & CO. & ANR. Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Pravin Anand, Adv. with Ms.Vaishali Mittal, Ms.D. Neha Reddy and Mr.Siddhant Chamola, Advs. versus S. HARCHARAN SINGH & ANR. Through None ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.24478/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiffs under Order 13 Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing the originals of the documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to originals being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24479/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that he would be filing the court fee within one week. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, the application is disposed of. CS(OS) No.3760/2014 Let the plaint be registered as ...
Kartik Sharma and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5549/2014 KARTIK SHARMA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with IO/SI Raj Kumar, CAW Cell. Complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 18940/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5549/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.715/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Shakar Pur on 3rd August, 2013 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well...
Azmal Khan and Anr Vs. State Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5524/2014 AZMAL KHAN & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Avinash Yadav, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Shankar Lal, PS Vivek Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % ORDER0512.2014 Crl. M.A. 18886/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5524/2014 and Crl. M.A. 18887/2014 (for stay) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.159/2012 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Vivek Vihar on 31st May, 2012 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as compl...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Urvashi Anwani and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~A-8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:05. 12.2014 MAC.APP. 7/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Manish Kaushik, Advocate for Mr.K.L.Nandwani, Advocate. versus URVASHI ANWANI & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is filed seeking to impugn the award dated 04.09.2010.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition are that the deceased Vikram Anwani on 11.09.2008 was going on foot. Near Shakti Sthal Bus Stand, Ring Road, Darya Ganj, Delhi, he was hit by a motorcycle which said to be driven in a rash and negligent manner. He fell down on the road and sustained fatal injuries.3. Based on the evidence on record, the Tribunal concluded that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle. On compensation the Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs.15,61,600/- as follows:Loss of fi...
R.K. JaIn Vs. Chairman, Income Tax Settlement Commission and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 2939/2014 R.K. JAIN ..... Petitioner versus CHAIRMAN, INCOME TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajveer Singh. For the Respondents : Mr P. Roychaudhuri. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner, inter alia, impugns an order dated 14.02.2014 passed by respondent No.3 Central Public Information Officer & Administrative Officer, Income Tax Settlement Commission, denying the information, which was earlier directed to be supplied to the petitioner under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the RTI Act).2. The impugned order indicates that the order dated 26.09.2013 passed by respondent No.2 pursuant to an application filed by the petitioner under the RTI Act; and the order dated 21.10.2013 passed by respondent No.4 in an appeal preferred by the petitioner against the or...
Mohd.Ahmad HussaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02,2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A.438/2014 MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. CRL.A.1580/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. versus MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned decision dated December 14, 2013 Mohd.Ahmad Hussain has been held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 304 IPC (Part-I or Part-II not stated in the impugned decision); for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC; for the offence punishable under Se...
State Vs. Mohd.Ahmad Hussain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02,2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A.438/2014 MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. CRL.A.1580/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. versus MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned decision dated December 14, 2013 Mohd.Ahmad Hussain has been held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 304 IPC (Part-I or Part-II not stated in the impugned decision); for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC; for the offence punishable under Se...
Lalit Bagai Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 38 (1)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 5054/2014 and CM No.10078/2014 LALIT BAGAI ... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE38(1) ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Gagan Kumar For the Respondents : Ms Suruchi Aggarwal CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the notice dated 26.03.2014 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 seeking to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 2007-08. It is obvious that the notice has been issued beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the proviso to Section 147 would be applicable. The said proviso requires, inter alia, the following conditions to be fulfilled before the assessment can be reopened beyond the said period of four...
- ‹ Prev
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- Next ›
- Last »