Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhavneet Singh Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8545/2014 and CM APPL. 19721-19722/2014 Decided on :05. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: BHAVNEET SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasbir Singh Malik, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate for R1 Ms. Senjul Khanna, Advocate for Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate for R-2/College . CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for directions to the respondent No.1/University and the respondent No.2/College to consider appointing him to the post of Administrative Officer of the respondent No.2/College, in terms of an advertisement dated 13.09.2013. Further, the petitioner seeks quashing/setting aside the decision to select the respondent No.3 to the subject post.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that pursuant to an advertisement dated 13.09.2013 issued by the respondent No.2/College, vacancies ...
Satish Chand Gupta Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :05. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 157/2011 SATISH CHAND GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. N. Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MCD AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioners are aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 19.08.2009 in T.A. No.97/2009. They were aggrieved by the action of the respondent (MCD) in withdrawing their regularization orders.2. The petitioners case before the CAT was that they were originally working as daily wage employees at various places for the MCD when, on different dates between 2002 and 2003, orders of regularization were issued in respect of their employment. While so, alleging that there were large scale irregularities and scams - involving forgery and collusion with the officials of MCD, the petitioners service...
Nishant and ors Vs. Fci and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7168/2014 Decided on 05.12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF : NISHANT & ORS Through: J.S. Bhasin with Ms. Rashmi Priya, Advocates ..... Petitioners versus FCI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate for FCI. Mr. Vikas Mahajan, Advocate for UOI. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notices dated 10.06.2013 issued by the Regional Director (NR) of the respondent No.2/Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder they were informed that on failure to show cause, their candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.1/FCI, would be cancelled and they would be debarred for a period of five years from the Commissions examinations.2. With the consent...
Union of India Vs. Kala (Decd) Thr Lrs & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 05, 2014 + LA.APP. 386/2014 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak & Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocate versus KALA (DECD) THR LRS & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Mrinlani S. Gutam & Ms. Ruchi Chopra, Advocates for respondent No.2-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C.M. No.20012/2014 (under Section 149 CPC r/w Sec. 151 CPC) Learned counsel for appellant undertakes that the deficient court fee would be placed on record within a period of four weeks. While taking the aforesaid undertaking on record, this application is disposed of. C.M. No.20011/2014 (u/S151CPC) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. LA.APP. 386/2014 & C.M. No.20013/2014 (u/O41R3 r/w Sec. 151 CPC) & C.M. No.20014/2014 (u/O41R5r/w Sec. 151 CPC) Impugned judgment of 3rd March, 2014 grants compensation in respect of acquisition of land in village Burari, Delhi vide Notification of LA.APP No.386/2014 Page 1...
Azmal Khan & Anr Vs. State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5524/2014 AZMAL KHAN & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Avinash Yadav, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Shankar Lal, PS Vivek Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % ORDER0512.2014 Crl. M.A. 18886/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5524/2014 and Crl. M.A. 18887/2014 (for stay) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.159/2012 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Vivek Vihar on 31st May, 2012 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. Petitioners as well as compl...
State Vs. Mohd.Ahmad Hussain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 02,2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 05, 2014 % + CRL.A.438/2014 MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. CRL.A.1580/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Satyavir Singh, SHO P.S.Bharat Nagar and Insp.Ashok Kumar. versus MOHD.AHMAD HUSSAIN Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajender Chhabra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Vide impugned decision dated December 14, 2013 Mohd.Ahmad Hussain has been held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 304 IPC (Part-I or Part-II not stated in the impugned decision); for the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC; for the offence punishable under Se...
Lokesh Kumar & Ors. Vs. State Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5554/2014 LOKESH KUMAR & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Ashok, S.Y. Usmani, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Rajvir Singh, P.S. Crime (Woman Cell). Mr. Rajesh, Advocate with R2/complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.18951/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.A. No.18952/2014 This application has been moved for condonation of delay, which is stated to be of 32 days in refiling the petition. For the reasons stated in this application, the same is allowed and the delay in refiling the petition is condoned. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5554/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.157/2013, registered under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at po...
Deere & Co. & Anr. Vs. S. Harcharan Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:5. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.3760/2014 DEERE & CO. & ANR. Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr.Pravin Anand, Adv. with Ms.Vaishali Mittal, Ms.D. Neha Reddy and Mr.Siddhant Chamola, Advs. versus S. HARCHARAN SINGH & ANR. Through None ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.24478/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiffs under Order 13 Rule 1 read with Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing the originals of the documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to originals being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24479/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that he would be filing the court fee within one week. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel, the application is disposed of. CS(OS) No.3760/2014 Let the plaint be registered as ...
Union of India & Anr. Vs. Kalyan Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 05, 2014 + LA.APP. 385/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak & Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocate versus KALYAN SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Mrinlani S. Gutam & Ms. Ruchi Chopra, Advocates for respondent No.2-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C.M. No.19984/2014 (under Section 149 CPC r/w Sec. 151 CPC) Learned counsel for appellant undertakes that the deficient court fee would be placed on record within a period of four weeks. While taking the aforesaid undertaking on record, this application is disposed of. C.M. No.19983/2014 (u/S151CPC) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. LA.APP. 385/2014 & C.M. No.19985/2014 (u/O41R3 r/w Sec. 151 CPC) & C.M. No.19986/2014 (u/O41R5r/w Sec. 151 CPC) Impugned judgment of 17th April, 2014, 2014 grants compensation in respect of acquisition of land in village Burari, Delhi vide notification LA.APP No.384/2014 P...
Rajender Kumar & Ors Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:5. h December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2665/2011 RAJENDER KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advs. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Sumit Chander, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction for setting aside the impugned award dated 07.11.2009 passed in ID No.25/2005 whereby the claim petition of the workman has been dismissed.2. Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal, ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the terms of reference vide order dated 09.11.2004 was as under:Whether the services of Sh. Chaman Singh, S/o, Sh. Ram Pal and Others (As per annexure A) have been terminated illegally and / or unjustifiably by the management and if so, to what sum of money as monetary relief along with other consequential benefits in terms of existing laws / Govt. Notifications...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »