Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Bhog Singh Vs. Rajiv Sinha and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :08. 12.2014 % W.P.(C) 4062/2014 & C.M. Nos. 8154/2014 & 15589/2014 RAM BHOG SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr. Avinash Tripathi & Mr. Abhinandan Banerjee, Advocates. versus RAJIV SINHA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dheeraj Kumar & Ms. Neeti Sahu, Advocates for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present Writ Petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 22.04.2014 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (CAT/ Tribunal) allowing OA No.1958/2011, and quashing the impugned Roster Register of STS as well as directing the official respondents to comply with the conditions prescribed in M.Nagraj & Ors. Vs. Union of India (2006) 8 SCC212 not to grant reservations to SC/ST candidates on the basis of the Roster Register prepared on the basis of res...
State Vs. Bashir Ahmed Ponnu and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 08, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1065/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with SI Dalip Kumar, Spl.Cell/NDR. versus BASHIR AHMED PONNU & ORS ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate for Respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. The State is aggrieved by the decision of the learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitting the respondents Bashir Ahmed Ponnu, Fayaz Ahmed Lone, Abdul Majeed Baba and Shahid Gafoor for the offences punishable under Section 120B/121/121-A/122/123 IPC & Section 17/18/20/21/23 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (in short the UAP Act), acquitting Bashir Ahmed for offence punishable under Section 489(B)/489 (C) of IPC and Shahid Gafoor for offences punishable under Section 186/353/...
M/S Devlok Property Private Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 5984/2014 M/S DEVLOK PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Bharat Beriwal For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Naginder Benipal for R-1. Mr Pawan Mathur for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in respect of which ...
v.K. Verma Vs. Enforcement Director
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. No.953 of 2009 V.K. VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur with Mr. K.R. Dogra, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr. Raman M. Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood and Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waze Ali Noor, Advocate. WITH CRL.M.C. No.954 of 2009 C.K. VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur with Mr. K.R. Dogra, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr. Raman M. Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood and Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waze Ali Noor, Advocate. WITH CRL.M.C. No.955 of 2009 M.K. VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur with Mr. K.R. Dogra, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr. Raman M. Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood and Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waz...
Gagan Rastogi Vs. Rp Explorer Master Fund and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h November, 2014 DECIDED ON :08. h December, 2014 + CS(OS) 2596/2014 GAGAN RASTOGI Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Rajeev Nayyar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ayush and Mr.Himanshu Gupta, Advocates. versus RP EXPLORER MASTER FUND & ANR. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Darpan Wadhwa with Mr.Aman Varma and Ms.Anushula Grover, Advocates for D-1. Mr.Manuj Aggarwal and Ms.Manvi Aggarwal, Advocate, for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.I.A.No.16399/2014 (u/O39R1&2) in CS(OS) No.2596/2014 1. Gagan Rastogi (hereinafter referred to plaintiff) has instituted the instant suit for injunction to restrain defendant No.1 from prosecuting and/or continuing/proceeding with Claim No.2013 Folio 1656 filed in the High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division, Commercial Court, England qua him.2. The plaintiffs case is that he is an Indian citizen and is engaged in the business of export and import of variou...
M/S. Kavish Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6387/2012 & CM No.17030/2012 MALIK TANNING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 4754/2014 & CM94672014 M/S. KAVISH IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Shikha Sapra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. Mr Naveen Malhotra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Amrit Singh for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn policy circular No.42 (RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereafter referred to as impugned circular) inasmuch as it curtails the benefit available under Focus Product Scheme in respect of Techn...
Dkt India Vs. Hll Lifecare Ltd. and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:8. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 2497/2012, I.A. Nos.14914/2012, 3936/2013 & CCP(O) No.13/2013 DKT INDIA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Anwesh Madhukar and Mr.Anshu Bhanot, Advs. versus HLL LIFECARE LTD. & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.C.Mukund, Adv. with Mr.S.Sukumaran, Mr.Anand Sukumar & Mr.Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Himanshu, for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff on 17th August, 2012 filed the above said suit against Bajaj Medicose, Distributor of HLL Lifecare Limited, a Government of India Enterprise and largest manufacturer of condoms in the world, seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing, passing off and damages to the tune of Rs.45 lacs, along with four applications being (i) I.A. No.14914/2012 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC), (ii) I.A. No.14915/2012 (under Order XXVI Rule 9 read with Order XXXIX Rule 7 CPC), (iii) I.A. No...
Amit Pal Vs. Union Public Service Commission
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :08. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 8393/2014, C.M. NO.19433-19434/2014 AMIT PAL ` ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. Shankar Raju, Sh. Ashish Kumar, Sh. Nilansh Gaur and Sh. Sunil Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ` Through: ..... Respondent Sh. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The writ petitioner claims a direction for the quashing of the impugned order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 21.11.2014 in O.A. No.2740/2014. In his application, he claimed relief by way of a direction to the respondent to permit him to proceed further in the Civil Services Examination (hereafter referred to as CSE-2014).2. The facts of this case throw into light exceptional and peculiar circumstances which are by and large uncontroverted. The advertisement inviting applications for CSE-2014 concededly mentioned th...
Malik Tanning Industries Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6387/2012 & CM No.17030/2012 MALIK TANNING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 4754/2014 & CM94672014 M/S. KAVISH IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Shikha Sapra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. Mr Naveen Malhotra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Amrit Singh for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn policy circular No.42 (RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereafter referred to as impugned circular) inasmuch as it curtails the benefit available under Focus Product Scheme in respect of Techn...
Havells India Ltd and Anr Vs. T.T Plyboards and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 3770/2014 Date of decision :8th December, 2014 % HAVELLS INDIA LTD & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through : Ms.Pratibha M. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sudeep Chatterjee and Ms. Deepthi Alexander, Advs. versus T.T PLYBOARDS & ORS Through : ..... Defendants Counsel (appearance not given) along with defendant No.3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) I.A.24544/2014 & I.A.24545/2014 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.2. Applications stand disposed of. I.A. 24546/2014 3. Let deficient court fee be filed within one week from today.4. Application stand disposed of. CS(OS) 3770/2014 5. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining violation and infringement of rights in the trade mark/logo/ label HAVELLS, infringement of copyright, passing off and dilution, damages/rendition of accounts, delivery-up etc.6. Counsel for defendants No.1 to 3 have entered appearance. The mat...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- Next ›
- Last »