Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Devlok Property Private Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 5984/2014 M/S DEVLOK PROPERTY PRIVATE LIMITED ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Bharat Beriwal For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC. Mr Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr Naginder Benipal for R-1. Mr Pawan Mathur for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) and in respect of which ...
Ram Bhog Singh Vs. Rajiv Sinha and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :08. 12.2014 % W.P.(C) 4062/2014 & C.M. Nos. 8154/2014 & 15589/2014 RAM BHOG SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Anand Tiwari, Mr. Avinash Tripathi & Mr. Abhinandan Banerjee, Advocates. versus RAJIV SINHA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Dheeraj Kumar & Ms. Neeti Sahu, Advocates for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present Writ Petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 22.04.2014 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (CAT/ Tribunal) allowing OA No.1958/2011, and quashing the impugned Roster Register of STS as well as directing the official respondents to comply with the conditions prescribed in M.Nagraj & Ors. Vs. Union of India (2006) 8 SCC212 not to grant reservations to SC/ST candidates on the basis of the Roster Register prepared on the basis of res...
Manu Khosla Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:08. 12.2014 W.P.(Crl) No.2448/2014 & Crl MA No.18992/2014 MANU KHOSLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.M. Bagai, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Arnab Naskar, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner seeks for a declaration that the detention order made against him (which has not been produced along with these writ proceedings) is void and unenforceable.2. The facts necessary to dispose of the petition are that one Anil Kumar was intercepted by Department of Revenue Officers on search on 15.04.2013. He was found to be in possession of 275kgs of narcotics and psychotropic substances; a statement under Section 67 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act) led to the arrest of the petitioner on 16.04.2013. His statement too was recorded on the dat...
Sandeep Chhabra and Ors Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5562/2014 SANDEEP CHHABRA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravin Rao, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with W/Insp. Sanjita, DIU, NWD (PS Keshav Puram) R-2/complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 08.12.2014 CRL.M.A. 19008/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5562/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.169/2013 registered under Section 406/498A IPC at Police Station Keshav Puram on 15.06.2013 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. The complainant is present in Court today. She is also identified by the Investigating...
Rashid Ali and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5559/2014 RASHID ALI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Seema Choudhary, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Neeraj Kumar, PS Welcome. Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 19004/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5559/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.165/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Welcome Colony on 13th March, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of the...
Rashid Ali and Ors. Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5559/2014 RASHID ALI & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Seema Choudhary, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Neeraj Kumar, PS Welcome. Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 19004/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5559/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.165/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Welcome Colony on 13th March, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Harish Kumar, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of the...
Sandeep Chhabra and Ors Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5562/2014 SANDEEP CHHABRA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravin Rao, Advocates with petitioners in person versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with W/Insp. Sanjita, DIU, NWD (PS Keshav Puram) R-2/complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 08.12.2014 CRL.M.A. 19008/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5562/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.169/2013 registered under Section 406/498A IPC at Police Station Keshav Puram on 15.06.2013 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. The complainant is present in Court today. She is also identified by the Investigating...
Amar @ Bhalla Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 08, 2014 + CRL.A. 1130/2014 AMAR @ BHALLA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Narsingh Narain Rai and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Sher Singh, SHO PS Burari CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.No.10328/2014 Since the appeal is being heard today itself for final hearing, instant application which seeks suspension of sentence pending hearing of the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Crl.A.No.1130/2014 1. It is the duty of every Trial Judge to carefully read and analyze the entire evidence led at a criminal trial and then find the nugget of truth. At a criminal trial where the accused is charged for the offence of murder which attracts even a capital sentence, the duty of care to appraise the evidence with the eyes of a hawk becomes even more ...
Manu Khosla Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$-20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:08. 12.2014 W.P.(Crl) No.2448/2014 & Crl MA No.18992/2014 MANU KHOSLA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.M. Bagai, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Arnab Naskar, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner seeks for a declaration that the detention order made against him (which has not been produced along with these writ proceedings) is void and unenforceable.2. The facts necessary to dispose of the petition are that one Anil Kumar was intercepted by Department of Revenue Officers on search on 15.04.2013. He was found to be in possession of 275kgs of narcotics and psychotropic substances; a statement under Section 67 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act) led to the arrest of the petitioner on 16.04.2013. His statement too was recorded on the dat...
Shadeed Iron and Steel Llc Vs. Ores and Mineral Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 + OMP15542014 SHADEED IRON AND STEEL LLC ..... PETITIONER Versus ORES AND MINERAL CORPORATION ..... RESPONDENT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Navin Chawla, Ms. Sonali Jaitley, Mr. Karan Kanwal and Mr. Rajat Jain, Advocates For the Respondent: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J IA No.24520/2014 (Exemption) and 24521/2014 (Exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. OMP15542014 and IA No.24519/2014 (stay) 2. This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) purportedly against the partial arbitral award dated 03.11.2014. The learned arbitrator, who has passed the award, is one, Mr. Dato Jude P. Benny. The appointment has taken place upon a request being made in this behalf by the respondent, to the International Chamber of Commerce, Paris (hereinafter in sh...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »