Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jawahar Lal Chhabra and ors Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~4(III) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 1702/2014 & CM35582014 JAWAHAR LAL CHHABRA & ORS .... Petitioners versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Gaurav Sarin with Ms Charul Sarin, Mr Ajitesh Kir, Mr Vishnu Langawat and Mr Veera Angrish For the Respondent Nos.1&2 : Mr Siddharth Panda For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Ajay Verma for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in resp...
Divya Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: December 08, 2014 + CRL.A. 1677/2014 DIVYA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ashwani Sharma, Advocate. versus STATE & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondents Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Inspector Raj Rani Sharma, Now in PCR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.19003/2014 (Exemption) Allowed. CRL.A. 1677/2014 and Crl.M.A.No.19002/2014 (Delay) 1. The appellant prefers this appeal against the judgment of the learned Trial Court dated July 08, 2014 whereby the respondent No.2 has been acquitted of the charges under Sections 363/336/34 IPC, 376 IPC, 342 IPC and 506 IPC.2. A missing report dated March 17, 2011 was lodged by Sushil Kumar, father of D stating that his daughter had gone with his sister PW-9 by Metro and thereafter she went missing. Same day PW-9 also made a complaint that on March 16, 2010 she along with the prosecutrix boarded the ...
Gagan Rastogi Vs. Rp Explorer Master Fund and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h November, 2014 DECIDED ON :08. h December, 2014 + CS(OS) 2596/2014 GAGAN RASTOGI Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate and Mr.Rajeev Nayyar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ayush and Mr.Himanshu Gupta, Advocates. versus RP EXPLORER MASTER FUND & ANR. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Darpan Wadhwa with Mr.Aman Varma and Ms.Anushula Grover, Advocates for D-1. Mr.Manuj Aggarwal and Ms.Manvi Aggarwal, Advocate, for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.I.A.No.16399/2014 (u/O39R1&2) in CS(OS) No.2596/2014 1. Gagan Rastogi (hereinafter referred to plaintiff) has instituted the instant suit for injunction to restrain defendant No.1 from prosecuting and/or continuing/proceeding with Claim No.2013 Folio 1656 filed in the High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division, Commercial Court, England qua him.2. The plaintiffs case is that he is an Indian citizen and is engaged in the business of export and import of variou...
Shadeed Iron and Steel Llc Vs. Ores and Mineral Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 + OMP15542014 SHADEED IRON AND STEEL LLC ..... PETITIONER Versus ORES AND MINERAL CORPORATION ..... RESPONDENT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Navin Chawla, Ms. Sonali Jaitley, Mr. Karan Kanwal and Mr. Rajat Jain, Advocates For the Respondent: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J IA No.24520/2014 (Exemption) and 24521/2014 (Exemption) 1. Allowed subject to just exceptions. OMP15542014 and IA No.24519/2014 (stay) 2. This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) purportedly against the partial arbitral award dated 03.11.2014. The learned arbitrator, who has passed the award, is one, Mr. Dato Jude P. Benny. The appointment has taken place upon a request being made in this behalf by the respondent, to the International Chamber of Commerce, Paris (hereinafter in sh...
Union of India Vs. Rati Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 08, 2014 + LA.APP. 387/2014 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate versus RATI RAM Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ruhi Chopra, Advocate for Ms. Mrinalini S. Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C.M.APPLN.20078/2014 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. C.M.APPL. No.20080/2014 (for condonation of delay) There is delay of 85 days in filing the accompanying appeal. The averments made in paragraphs No.2 to 4 of the application sufficiently explain the delay occasioned. The application is allowed and the delay is condoned. The application is accordingly disposed of. C.M.APPL. No.20082/2014 (u/O1R10of CPC) Notice. Ms. Ruhi Chopra, Advocate, accepts notice of this application on LA.APP. 387/2014 Page 1 behalf of proposed party sought to be impleaded. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and DDA is impleaded as a second...
v.K. Verma Vs. Enforcement Director
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. No.953 of 2009 V.K. VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur with Mr. K.R. Dogra, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr. Raman M. Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood and Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waze Ali Noor, Advocate. WITH CRL.M.C. No.954 of 2009 C.K. VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur with Mr. K.R. Dogra, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr. Raman M. Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood and Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waze Ali Noor, Advocate. WITH CRL.M.C. No.955 of 2009 M.K. VERMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur with Mr. K.R. Dogra, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr. Raman M. Mathur, Mr. Shahrukh Hussain, Mr. Badar Mehmood and Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocates. versus ENFORCEMENT DIRECTOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Waz...
Dkt India Vs. Hll Lifecare Ltd. & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:8. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 2497/2012, I.A. Nos.14914/2012, 3936/2013 & CCP(O) No.13/2013 DKT INDIA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Anwesh Madhukar and Mr.Anshu Bhanot, Advs. versus HLL LIFECARE LTD. & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.C.Mukund, Adv. with Mr.S.Sukumaran, Mr.Anand Sukumar & Mr.Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Himanshu, for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff on 17th August, 2012 filed the above said suit against Bajaj Medicose, Distributor of HLL Lifecare Limited, a Government of India Enterprise and largest manufacturer of condoms in the world, seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing, passing off and damages to the tune of Rs.45 lacs, along with four applications being (i) I.A. No.14914/2012 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC), (ii) I.A. No.14915/2012 (under Order XXVI Rule 9 read with Order XXXIX Rule 7 CPC), (iii) I.A. No...
Amar @ Bhalla Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 08, 2014 + CRL.A. 1130/2014 AMAR @ BHALLA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Narsingh Narain Rai and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Sher Singh, SHO PS Burari CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.No.10328/2014 Since the appeal is being heard today itself for final hearing, instant application which seeks suspension of sentence pending hearing of the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Crl.A.No.1130/2014 1. It is the duty of every Trial Judge to carefully read and analyze the entire evidence led at a criminal trial and then find the nugget of truth. At a criminal trial where the accused is charged for the offence of murder which attracts even a capital sentence, the duty of care to appraise the evidence with the eyes of a hawk becomes even more ...
M/S. Kavish Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6387/2012 & CM No.17030/2012 MALIK TANNING INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 4754/2014 & CM94672014 M/S. KAVISH IMPEX PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms Shikha Sapra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. Mr Naveen Malhotra for petitioner in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 6387/2012. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr Amrit Singh for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in W.P.(C) 4754/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn policy circular No.42 (RE-2010)/2009-14 dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereafter referred to as impugned circular) inasmuch as it curtails the benefit available under Focus Product Scheme in respect of Techn...
Jawahar Lal Chhabra & Ors Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~4(III) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 1702/2014 & CM35582014 JAWAHAR LAL CHHABRA & ORS .... Petitioners versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Gaurav Sarin with Ms Charul Sarin, Mr Ajitesh Kir, Mr Vishnu Langawat and Mr Veera Angrish For the Respondent Nos.1&2 : Mr Siddharth Panda For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Ajay Verma for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in resp...
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »