Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ramesh Mehto Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 09, 2014 + CRL.A. 1409/2014 RAMESH MEHTO Represented by: ..... Appellant Dr.Jose Verghese, Advocate with Mr.Jawahar Singh, Ms.Priya Singh, Mr.Dhruv Jose and Ms.Anima Kujur, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.J.P.Meena, PS Mehrauli CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.No.10722/2014 Since we have proceeded to hear arguments in the appeal we dismiss Crl.M.B.No.10722/2014, which seeks suspension of sentence pending final hearing of the appeal. Crl.A.No.1409/2014 1. The preface by the learned Trial Judge to the impugned decision dated May 30, 2014, reads as under:1. Honours is to be saved and upheld at all costs be it the life of ones own or the life of someone else has been and to a great extent, is still the philosophy of a good number of persons in this country and elsewhere. The honour may ...
Government of N.C.T. Delhi and Ors. Vs. Shweta Tripathi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :09. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 3089/2014 GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. DELHI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. Yogesh Saini with Sh. Kartik Jindal, for Sh. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. Versus SHWETA TRIPATHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. (appearance not given), in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioner, Govt. of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD) challenges an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 17.09.2013 in O.A. No.4212/2012. The respondents/applicants had approached the CAT for appropriate directions, questioning the GNCTDs decision not to grant them maternity leave for 180 days and confining it to 12 weeks. Both the respondents were working in the Department of Women and Child Development, GNCTD. They were appointed as Welfare Officers on 25.08.2009 and 14.07.2010. The first applicant sought leave on 20.06.2012 through ...
M/S Sigma Generators Pvt. Ltd. and Anr Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2014 % + LPA7842014 M/S SIGMA GENERATORS PVT. LTD. & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar, Adv. along with the Director of appellant No.1. Versus ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. H.D. Talwani for Mr. M.S. Saluja, Adv. for respondent/Bank. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.CM No.20184/2014 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of. LPA No.784/2014 & CM No.20183/2014 (for stay) 3. This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 2 nd December, 2014 of the learned Single Judge, of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5716/2014 preferred by the appellants.4. The appellants had preferred the said writ petition impugning the notice dated 26th May, 2014 issued by the respondents Oriental Bank of Commerce (OBC) / its officers to the appellant under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Rec...
Ardee Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Yashpal and Sons
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.A. 21/2014 Judgment reserved on:01. 12.2014 Judgment pronounced on:09. 12.2014 ARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Kr.Mishra, Advocate alongwith Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocate. versus ANURADHA BHATIA Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate alongwith Ms.Aastha Dhawan, Advocate. AND ARB.A. 22/2014 + ARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Kr.Mishra, Advocate alongwith Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocate. versus YASHPAL AND SONS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate alongwith Ms.Aastha Dhawan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 Vide this judgment, I dispose of both the appeals as the matter in issue is involved in both the cases is the same and both the cases are between the same parties and facts are also similar in both the cases.2. The present appeals have been filed against the order of the arbitrator dated 10.07.2014 whereby the arbitrator ...
Ardee Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anuradha Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.A. 21/2014 Judgment reserved on:01. 12.2014 Judgment pronounced on:09. 12.2014 ARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Kr.Mishra, Advocate alongwith Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocate. versus ANURADHA BHATIA Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate alongwith Ms.Aastha Dhawan, Advocate. AND ARB.A. 22/2014 + ARDEE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Kr.Mishra, Advocate alongwith Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advocate. versus YASHPAL AND SONS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Kirti Uppal, Sr.Advocate alongwith Ms.Aastha Dhawan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 Vide this judgment, I dispose of both the appeals as the matter in issue is involved in both the cases is the same and both the cases are between the same parties and facts are also similar in both the cases.2. The present appeals have been filed against the order of the arbitrator dated 10.07.2014 whereby the arbitrator ...
New India Assurance Co Ltd Vs. Santosh Devi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 12.2014 + MAC.APP. 398/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Manish Kaushik, proxy counsel for Mr. K L. Nandwani, Advocate versus SANTOSH DEVI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K. S. Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant to impugn the award dated 15.02.2011.2. The brief facts are that the deceased Smt. Premwati on 08.03.2006 was going to open her tea shop. She passed M. B. Road. Deceased was going with her mother Smt. Santosh Devi. Deceased was hit by a dumper. The deceased sustained fatal injuries and expired.3. Based on the evidence on record, the Tribunal concluded that the accident took place due to rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle/dumper.4. On compensation, the Tribunal awarded a total sum of Rs.4,86,720/- as follows:Loss of dependency Funeral charges Rs.10,000/- Love and affection R...
Punnoose K. Elias and Anr. Vs. Sh. Ram Parshad and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~A-16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. 12.2014 + MAC.APP. 724/2012 PUNNOOSE K. ELIAS & ANR. ..... Appellants Through Ms.O.P. Mannie, Adv. Versus SH. RAM PARSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Anand Vardhan,Adv for Respondent no.3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present appeal the claimants seek enhancement of the awarded amount by the Award dated 09.09.2011.2. The brief facts which led to filing of the claim petition are that on 10.05.2009 at about 11:00 pm Sh.Pintu Punnoose was plying a motorcycle from the side of Mehrauli towards Mahipalpur on Ring Road. When he reached in front of IDBI Bank, Mahipalpur suddenly a dumper tractor being driven by Respondent No.1 in a rash and negligent manner came from behind and hit the motorcycle of the deceased. As a result of the impact, he fell on the road and sustained grievous injuries. He was removed to Safdurjung Hospital where he succumbed to his injuries.3. Based on ...
Tata Aig General Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Sh Shibu v Pillai and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~A-22 & A-23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Decision:09. 12.2014 MAC.APP. 1008/2013 TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Ms.Shantha Devi Raman, Advocate versus SH SHIBU V PILLAI & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms.Sumita Hazarika, Mr.R.K.Singh and Ms.Ipsita Behura, Advocates for R-1 MAC.APP. 422/2014 SH SHIBU V PILLAI & ANR ..... Appellant Through Ms.Sumita Hazarika, Mr.R.K.Singh and Ms.Ipsita Behura, Advocates versus TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Respondent Through Ms.Shanta Devi Raman, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. The present two appeals are filed pursuant to an accident that took place on 27.10.2011. MAC.App.1008/2013 is filed by the insurance company seeking to impugn the Award on ground that the compensation awarded is on the higher side. MAC.APP.422/2014 is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation.2. The brief facts are that on 27.10.2011 the claimant Shri Shibu V.P...
Dkt India Vs. Hll Lifecare Ltd. and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:8. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 2497/2012, I.A. Nos.14914/2012, 3936/2013 & CCP(O) No.13/2013 DKT INDIA Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Anwesh Madhukar and Mr.Anshu Bhanot, Advs. versus HLL LIFECARE LTD. & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.C.Mukund, Adv. with Mr.S.Sukumaran, Mr.Anand Sukumar & Mr.Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Himanshu, for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff on 17th August, 2012 filed the above said suit against Bajaj Medicose, Distributor of HLL Lifecare Limited, a Government of India Enterprise and largest manufacturer of condoms in the world, seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing, passing off and damages to the tune of Rs.45 lacs, along with four applications being (i) I.A. No.14914/2012 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC), (ii) I.A. No.14915/2012 (under Order XXVI Rule 9 read with Order XXXIX Rule 7 CPC), (iii) I.A. No...
Amar @ Bhalla Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-08-2014
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 08, 2014 + CRL.A. 1130/2014 AMAR @ BHALLA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Narsingh Narain Rai and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Sher Singh, SHO PS Burari CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.No.10328/2014 Since the appeal is being heard today itself for final hearing, instant application which seeks suspension of sentence pending hearing of the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Crl.A.No.1130/2014 1. It is the duty of every Trial Judge to carefully read and analyze the entire evidence led at a criminal trial and then find the nugget of truth. At a criminal trial where the accused is charged for the offence of murder which attracts even a capital sentence, the duty of care to appraise the evidence with the eyes of a hawk becomes even more ...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »