Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Rakesh Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~20 to 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 09, 2014 + (i) LA.APP. 314/2013 SHRI RAKESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI Mr. Abhishek Kr. Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA + (ii) LA.APP. 316/2013 SHRI RAKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI + (iii) LA.APP. 157/2014 PRAHLAD SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus LA.APP. 314 & 316/13 & 157/14 Page 1 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No....
Smt. Kailash Devi and Anr. Vs. Shri Brij Pal Manocha
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.1078/2014 9th December , 2014 % SMT. KAILASH DEVI AND ANR. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. Pradeep Dewan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anupam Dhingra, Advocate and Mr. Ankur Rai, Advocate. VERSUS SHRI BRIJ PAL MANOCHA Through: ...... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Nos.20196-97/2014 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M.s stand disposed of. + C.M.(M) No.1078/2014 and C.M. No.20198/2014 (stay) 2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the executing court dated 25.11.2014 by which the executing court has dismissed the objections of the objectors/judgment debtors/tenants against the execution of the judgment and decree dated 27.5.2013 passed with respect to the tenanted premises being one room in the property no.198/5, Gharhi Jharia Maria also known as Ramesh Market Garhi Jarhia...
Vinod Kumar and Ors Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5597/2014 VINOD KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Balvinder Singh, Advocates with petitioners in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI &ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with Sub Inspector Vishvendra, P.S. Seemapuri. Mr. Niwas Sharma, Advocate for R-2 to 5 with R-2 to 5 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % ORDER0912.2014 Crl.M.A. No.19099/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. CRL.M.C. No.5597/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.501/2005, registered under Sections 452/324/323/427/506/34 IPC at police station Seemapuri on 25th August, 2005, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Niwas Sharma, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf o...
Commissioner of Income Tax-Xii Vs. Subodh Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 09, 2014 + ITA802014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XII Through ..... Appellant Mr.Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate versus SUBODH GUPTA Through ..... Respondent Mr.Ved Jain, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act in short) relates to assessment year 2009-10.2. The assessee had filed return for the said year on 28.09.2009 declaring income of Rs.35,21,970/-.3. In the scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer relying upon Section 40A(3) disallowed expenditure of Rs.10,61,49,773/-. He rejected reliance on Clause g to Rule 6DD of Income Tax Rules, 1962 (Rules for short) to the effect that payments were made to villagers who were operating tractors, trolleys, bullock carts and had supplied materials like bitumen, grit etc. It was the contentio...
the State (Nct of Delhi) Vs. Devender Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: December 09, 2014 + CRL.L.P. 728/2014 THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State versus DEVENDER SINGH & ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.19083/2014 (Exemption) Allowed. Crl.M.A.No.19082/2014 (Delay) For the reasons stated in the application 27 days delay in filing leave to appeal petition is condoned. CRL.L.P. 728/2014 1. The State seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated July 30, 2014 whereby the respondents who are the mother-in-law, father-in-law, brothers-in-law and sister-in-law have been acquitted of the charges levelled against them. Mukesh, the husband of the complainant Sarita died during the trial and thus proceedings qua him abated.2. On March 20, 2008 at 11.32 PM an information was received at PS Narela with regard to admission of Sari...
Indian Medical Association Vs. Ministry of Labour and Employmentand An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 7080/2013 INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT& ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Atul Sharma and Mr Nitesh Jain. For the Respondents : Mr Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr T.P. Singh for R-1. Mr Amit Kumar and Mr Ashish Kumar for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns a notification No.U-16012/02/2012-SS-I dated 13.06.2013, issued by the Ministry of Labour and Employment inasmuch as it includes the name of respondent No.2 as a constituent member of the Employees State Insurance Corporation (hereafter ESIC). The petitioner assails the appointment of respondent No.2 as a member of ESIC as being contrary to the provisions of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereafter the ESI Act).2. According to the petitioner, the appointment of Dr. Purshottam Lal (re...
Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (Fimi) Vs. Union of India and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7745/2014 FEDERATION OF INDIAN MINERAL INDUSTRIES (FIMI) .... Petitioner Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Tarun Patnaik, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Joseph Aristotle, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. for R3/State of Karnataka. Mr. Kapil Dutta, Adv. for MCD. AND + W.P.(C) No.7746/2014 M/S ORISSA MANGANESE & MINERALS LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Tarun Patnaik, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor and Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for R-1/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been filed seeking a decla...
Shri Rakesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~20 to 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 09, 2014 + (i) LA.APP. 314/2013 SHRI RAKESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI Mr. Abhishek Kr. Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA + (ii) LA.APP. 316/2013 SHRI RAKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI + (iii) LA.APP. 157/2014 PRAHLAD SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus LA.APP. 314 & 316/13 & 157/14 Page 1 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No....
Mrs. S Sivamani Vs. The Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6369/2013 & CM No.13921/2013 MRS. S SIVAMANI ..... Petitioner versus THE UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.P.K. Mittal and Ms.Mehak Gupta. For the Respondent : Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr Abhishek Chaudhary for R/UOI. Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns an order dated 06.05.2013 passed by the Approval Committee (hereafter AC) rejecting the petitioners representation to be considered eligible for scheme for setting up Cold Chain, Value Addition and Preservation Infrastructure in the country.2. The petitioners proposal under the scheme was rejected by the AC at its meeting held on 24.01.2013, as the AC found that the petitioner was a shareholder of M/s SH Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter SHCSPL) which had already been approv...
Manoj Garg Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision: December 09, 2014 W.P. (CRL) 2055/2014, Crl.M.B. 11097/2014 & Crl.M.A.15826/2014 MANOJ GARG Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Adv. instructed by Mr.Raktim Gogoi, Mr.Harshit Shiti, Mr.Shartaj Gill, Mr.Wattan Sharma, Mr.Akshay Chandra, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI/R-1. Mr.Pavan Narang, Mr.Shivam Takiar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Pursuant to a detention order dated June 02, 2010 based on the grounds of detention of the even date the petitioner has been detained on August 31, 2014. The prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by quashing and setting aside the detention order dated June 02, 2010 bearing No.673/07/2010/CUS-VIII passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smugglin...
- ‹ Prev
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›
- Last »