Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shyam Lal and Ors. Vs. The Financial Commissioner and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2014 % + LPA No.775/2014 SHYAM LAL & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Ashish Aggarwal with Mr. Ashish Virmani & Ms. Kritika Khanijo, Adv. Versus THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Ferida Satarawala, Adv. for R-1 & 2/GNCTD. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J CM Nos. 19942/2014 & 19943/2014 (both for exemptions) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of. LPA7752014 & CM Nos.19940/2014 (for filing additional documents) & 19941/2014 (for stay) 3. This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 25th September, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court, allowing W.P.(C) No.1369513706/2005 filed by the respondents No.3 to 14, by remanding the matter to the Court of Revenue Assistant.4. We have heard the counsel for the appellants no.1 and 2 and the four legal heirs of the deceased appellant No....
Satya Prakash Mittal Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:9. h December, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.2866/2014 & CMs No.5937/2014 (for stay) & 5939/2014 (for filing additional documents). SATYA PRAKASH MITTAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay J.Hegde & Mr. P.K. Bansal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Digvijay Rai, Mr. Jaiveer, Ms. Ruby Singh, Mr. K.D. Chopra & Ms. Nehga Gupta, Advs. for AAI. Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K. Raghavacharuvulyu, Mr. Kailash Pandey, Ms. Arunima Pal & Mr. Ranjeet Singh, Advs. for R-3,6&8. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), (i) impugns the Request for Qualification (RFQ) issued in August, 2012, the Request for Proposal (RFP) issued in September, 2013 and the Award of Concession granted in October, 2013 by the respondent no.2 Air...
Somnath Majhi and Ors Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~7 and 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4504/2014 TAKSU @ ASRAFUL ISLAM & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Parul Choudhary, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Vijay Pal, PS Sagar Pur. Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 with respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person. + CRL.M.C. 4505/2014 SOMNATH MAJHI & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Vijay Pal, PS Sagar Pur. Ms. Parul Choudhary, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 with respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 15428/2014 (for exemption) in CRL.M.C. 4504/2014 Crl. M.A. 15429/2014 (for exemption) in CRL.M.C. 4505/2014 Exemptions, as prayed for, are allowed, subject to all just ex...
Anmol Kumar Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4290/2014 ANMOL KUMAR Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Ravi Chandra Prakash with Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through ..... Respondents Mr. Yudhishter Sharma, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate for R-2 & 3. Date of Decision:9. h December, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The issue that arises for consideration in the present proceeding is whether the lowest of the cut-off marks amongst General (GE), Other Backward Classes (Non Creamy Layer) [OBC (NCL)]., Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) candidates is applicable to Persons with Disability (PwD) candidates at the time of allocation of seats.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that on 15th May, 2013, the petitioner passed his intermediate examination from Bihar Intermediate Education Council with 63.20% having 316 marks out of 500 marks. He cleared JEE (Main) 2013, but did not cle...
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi Vs. S.Pritam Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~R-128 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 09, 2014 + ITA42003 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Appellant Through Mr.Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advocate versus S.PRITAM SINGH ..... Respondent Through Mr.Prakash Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) This appeal by the Revenue pertains to block period, assessment year 1986-87 to 13.10.1995, and impugns the findings recorded in the order dated 26.06.2002 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in relation to deletion of addition of Rs.9,10,000/- on account of profit from undisclosed sales i.e. sales made outside the books of accounts.2. By order dated 19.12.2003, the following substantial question of law was framed:(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was correct in law in deleting the addition of Rs.9,10,000/- made on account of profits eawrned on u...
Rajpal S/O Jage Ram and Ors. Vs. Gnct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 9th December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 7657/2009 RAJPAL S/O JAGE RAM & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.S. Rana, Advocate. Versus GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Yogesh Saini for Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 2. Ms.Geetika Sharma, Advocate for Respondent No.7. Mr.D.V. Khatri, Advocate for Respondent No.8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek directions for setting aside the impugned order dated 17.08.2007 passed by the Financial Commissioner in Revision Petition No.67/02-CA, under Section 42 of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (hereinafter to be referred as the Act), titled as Ram Chander & Anr. Vs. Dharam Singh & Ors., whereby Gaon Sabha (village Khera Khurd) lands meant for common purpose Chargah Maveshian (Pasture) bearing Khasra Nos. 51/22 min. Sou...
Prahlad Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~20 to 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 09, 2014 + (i) LA.APP. 314/2013 SHRI RAKESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI Mr. Abhishek Kr. Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA + (ii) LA.APP. 316/2013 SHRI RAKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI + (iii) LA.APP. 157/2014 PRAHLAD SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus LA.APP. 314 & 316/13 & 157/14 Page 1 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No....
Aditya Bansal and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5584/2014 ADITYA BANSAL & ORS. Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Bhupinder Mehtani and Ms. Neha Maggo, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate with complainant. Sub Inspector Subhash Chand, P.S. Shakarpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.19075/2014 Exemption, as prayed, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5584/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.1112/2013 under Section 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at police station Shakarpur, on 01.11.2013, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. S. K. Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2 / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The com...
M/S Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7745/2014 FEDERATION OF INDIAN MINERAL INDUSTRIES (FIMI) .... Petitioner Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Tarun Patnaik, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Joseph Aristotle, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. for R3/State of Karnataka. Mr. Kapil Dutta, Adv. for MCD. AND + W.P.(C) No.7746/2014 M/S ORISSA MANGANESE & MINERALS LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Tarun Patnaik, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor and Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for R-1/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been filed seeking a decla...
Taksu @ Asraful Islam and Ors Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~7 and 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4504/2014 TAKSU @ ASRAFUL ISLAM & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Parul Choudhary, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Vijay Pal, PS Sagar Pur. Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 with respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person. + CRL.M.C. 4505/2014 SOMNATH MAJHI & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Vijay Pal, PS Sagar Pur. Ms. Parul Choudhary, Advocate for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 with respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 15428/2014 (for exemption) in CRL.M.C. 4504/2014 Crl. M.A. 15429/2014 (for exemption) in CRL.M.C. 4505/2014 Exemptions, as prayed for, are allowed, subject to all just ex...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »