Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Rakesh Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~20 to 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 09, 2014 + (i) LA.APP. 314/2013 SHRI RAKESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI Mr. Abhishek Kr. Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA + (ii) LA.APP. 316/2013 SHRI RAKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI + (iii) LA.APP. 157/2014 PRAHLAD SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus LA.APP. 314 & 316/13 & 157/14 Page 1 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No....
Aditya Bansal and Ors. Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5584/2014 ADITYA BANSAL & ORS. Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Bhupinder Mehtani and Ms. Neha Maggo, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor. Mr. S.K. Verma, Advocate with complainant. Sub Inspector Subhash Chand, P.S. Shakarpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A. No.19075/2014 Exemption, as prayed, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.5584/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.1112/2013 under Section 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at police station Shakarpur, on 01.11.2013, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. S. K. Verma, Advocate for respondent No.2 / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The com...
M/S Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7745/2014 FEDERATION OF INDIAN MINERAL INDUSTRIES (FIMI) .... Petitioner Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Tarun Patnaik, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Joseph Aristotle, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. for R3/State of Karnataka. Mr. Kapil Dutta, Adv. for MCD. AND + W.P.(C) No.7746/2014 M/S ORISSA MANGANESE & MINERALS LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Tarun Patnaik, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor and Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for R-1/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been filed seeking a decla...
Mrs. S Sivamani Vs. the Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6369/2013 & CM No.13921/2013 MRS. S SIVAMANI ..... Petitioner versus THE UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.P.K. Mittal and Ms.Mehak Gupta. For the Respondent : Ms.Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr Abhishek Chaudhary for R/UOI. Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns an order dated 06.05.2013 passed by the Approval Committee (hereafter AC) rejecting the petitioners representation to be considered eligible for scheme for setting up Cold Chain, Value Addition and Preservation Infrastructure in the country.2. The petitioners proposal under the scheme was rejected by the AC at its meeting held on 24.01.2013, as the AC found that the petitioner was a shareholder of M/s SH Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. (hereafter SHCSPL) which had already been approv...
Manoj Garg Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision: December 09, 2014 W.P. (CRL) 2055/2014, Crl.M.B. 11097/2014 & Crl.M.A.15826/2014 MANOJ GARG Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Vikram Chaudhri, Sr.Adv. instructed by Mr.Raktim Gogoi, Mr.Harshit Shiti, Mr.Shartaj Gill, Mr.Wattan Sharma, Mr.Akshay Chandra, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI/R-1. Mr.Pavan Narang, Mr.Shivam Takiar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Pursuant to a detention order dated June 02, 2010 based on the grounds of detention of the even date the petitioner has been detained on August 31, 2014. The prayer in the writ petition is for issuance of a writ of habeas corpus by quashing and setting aside the detention order dated June 02, 2010 bearing No.673/07/2010/CUS-VIII passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smugglin...
Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (Fimi) Vs. Union of India and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7745/2014 FEDERATION OF INDIAN MINERAL INDUSTRIES (FIMI) .... Petitioner Through: Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Tarun Patnaik, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Rohitendra Deb, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Joseph Aristotle, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.B. Elakkumanan, Adv. for R3/State of Karnataka. Mr. Kapil Dutta, Adv. for MCD. AND + W.P.(C) No.7746/2014 M/S ORISSA MANGANESE & MINERALS LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Tarun Patnaik, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Mr. Waize Ali Noor and Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for R-1/UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. These petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been filed seeking a decla...
Shri Rakesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~20 to 22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 09, 2014 + (i) LA.APP. 314/2013 SHRI RAKESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI Mr. Abhishek Kr. Singh, Advocate for Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA + (ii) LA.APP. 316/2013 SHRI RAKESH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: .....Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI + (iii) LA.APP. 157/2014 PRAHLAD SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr.I.S.Dahiya, Advocate versus LA.APP. 314 & 316/13 & 157/14 Page 1 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr.Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. Kushal Raj, Advocates for Respondent No.1/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) CM No....
Saisudhir Infrastructures Limited Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2014 + LPA7532014 SAISUDHIR INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar and Mr. Vishnu Kumar Jain, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh and Ms. Shipra Shukla, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J CM No.19118/2014 (for condonation of 16 days delay in filing the appeal) 1. We have heard the counsel for the appellant as well as the counsel for the respondents No.1 & 2 appearing on advance notice. Need is not felt to hear the respondent No.3 M/s. Indu Project Limited on the application. For the reasons stated, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.2. The application is disposed of. LPA7532014 & CM No.19115/2014 (for directions) 3. This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 8 th September, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W...
Adidas India Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Hicare India Properties Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on : December 02, 2014 Judgment Delivered on : December 09, 2014 + FAO (OS) 262/2013 ADIDAS INDIA MARKETING PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Represented by: Mr.Arvind Nigam, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pramod K.Singh and Mr.Vijay Srivastava, Advocates versus HICARE INDIA PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Arun Kathpalia, Advocate with Mr.M.Shoeb Alam, Mr.Santosh Kumar, Mr.Anupam Pandey and Mr.Shikhar Garg, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Award dated December 10, 2010 passed by the learned sole arbitrator against the appellant and in favour of the respondent was challenged by the appellant by way of objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the learned Single Judge of this Court. The challenge partly succeeded because of a concession given by the respondent. The concession finds a reflection in th...
Dharamvir Walia and Anr. Vs. Dhani Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-09-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CM(M) No.1458/2011 9th December , 2014 DHARAMVIR WALIA & ANR. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. Virag Kr. Aggarwal, Adv. VERSUS DHANI RAM Through: ...... Respondent Mr. S.D.Dixit, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the concurrent judgments of the courts below; of the Rent Controller dated 20.12.2010 and the Rent Control Tribunal dated 2.12.2011; whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlord for nonpayment of rent under Section 14(1)(a) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) was decreed and an eviction decree was passed against the petitioners/tenants. At the outset, it is required to be stated that admittedly the present default is a case of second default and if there is a second default no benefit would be available to the petitioners/tenants against evi...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »