Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Stl Global Ltd. Vs. Oriental Bank of Commerce and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2014 % + LPA No.763/2014 STL GLOBAL LTD. Through: .. Appellant Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Kumar, Adv. Versus ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. S.S. Lingwal, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 29th September, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.7354/2013 preferred by the appellant. We heard the senior counsel for the appellant at length on admission and reserved judgment.2. The writ petition from which this appeal arises was filed to: (i) Direct the respondents No.1 and 2 Oriental Bank of Commerce and United Bank of India to give to the appellant at the cost of the appellant the certified copy of the complete file in respect of the loan granted by the said Banks to the respondent No.3 RPS Infrastructure Ltd. (ii) Direct...
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Grover Restaurant and Catererers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1051 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus JAGAT RAM & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Aditya Sharma proxy for Mr. S. Satyanarayana, Advocate. WITH CRL.A. 1052 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus R.K. GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vijay Gupta, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1053 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus P.P. SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents None. WITH CRL.A. 1054 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus RAJIV BHASIN & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mukul Dhawan, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1055 of 2008 B.S.E.S. R...
Kanchan Kapoor and Ors. Vs. Sarwan Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. No.338/2011 10th December, 2014 % KANCHAN KAPOOR & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners VERSUS SARWAN KUMAR Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Vijay Gupta and Mr. Mehul Gupta, Adv. for applicants/respondents. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Review Petition No.544/2014 (U/o 47 Rule 1 & 2 CPC, Section114 CPC by respondent) & CM No.20265/2014 (exemption) 1. This rent control revision petition was decided by a detailed judgment on 17.11.2014 allowing the petition and setting aside the impugned judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 4.6.2011 which had rejected the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners/tenants. By the judgment dated 17.11.2014, the leave to defend application was allowed and since the petitioners in the revision petition i.e the tenants were evicted in execution of the judgment dated 4.6.2011 which was impugned in the petition, the p...
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. HasibuddIn and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1051 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus JAGAT RAM & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Aditya Sharma proxy for Mr. S. Satyanarayana, Advocate. WITH CRL.A. 1052 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus R.K. GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vijay Gupta, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1053 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus P.P. SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents None. WITH CRL.A. 1054 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus RAJIV BHASIN & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mukul Dhawan, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1055 of 2008 B.S.E.S. R...
Zubair Ahmad and Ors Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5602/2014 ZUBAIR AHMAD & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Hameed S. Sheikh, Mr. Amar Pal, Mr. Pramod Kumar and Mr.Ashutosh Jha, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with SI S.P. Singh, PS Sangam Vihar Mohd. Riyaz Ahmad Ali, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A. 19137/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5602/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.397/2014 registered at Police Station Sangam Vihar on 21.07.2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2, as well as counsel for the third respondent / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant ...
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Rajiv BhasIn and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1051 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus JAGAT RAM & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Aditya Sharma proxy for Mr. S. Satyanarayana, Advocate. WITH CRL.A. 1052 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus R.K. GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vijay Gupta, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1053 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus P.P. SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents None. WITH CRL.A. 1054 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus RAJIV BHASIN & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mukul Dhawan, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1055 of 2008 B.S.E.S. R...
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Jagat Ram and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1051 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus JAGAT RAM & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Aditya Sharma proxy for Mr. S. Satyanarayana, Advocate. WITH CRL.A. 1052 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus R.K. GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vijay Gupta, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1053 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus P.P. SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents None. WITH CRL.A. 1054 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus RAJIV BHASIN & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mukul Dhawan, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1055 of 2008 B.S.E.S. R...
Arvind andors Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5619/2014 ARVIND &ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Ajay Sinha, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with W/ASI Prem Lata, PS Narela CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 19180/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5619/2014 % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.626/2012 registered under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Narela on 19.11.2012, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State, as well as counsel for the second respondent/ complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant is present in person. She is also identified by the Investigating O...
B.S.E.S. Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. R.K. Gupta and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1051 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus JAGAT RAM & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Aditya Sharma proxy for Mr. S. Satyanarayana, Advocate. WITH CRL.A. 1052 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus R.K. GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vijay Gupta, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1053 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate versus P.P. SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents None. WITH CRL.A. 1054 of 2008 B.S.E.S. RAJDHANI POWER LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, standing counsel with Mr. Deepak Pathak, Advocate. versus RAJIV BHASIN & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Mukul Dhawan, Advocate WITH CRL.A. 1055 of 2008 B.S.E.S. R...
M/S Satnam Agri Products Ltd. and Ors Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7158/2014 & CM No.16189/2014 (stay) Pronounced on:10. 12.2014 M/S SATNAM AGRI PRODUCTS LTD. & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Ralli with Mr. Aayush Juneja, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Abhishek Choudhary, Mr. Rajeev Kumar Yadav, Adv. for respondent/UOI. Mr. Karan Khanna, Adv. for R-3, 8 & 9/Indian Overseas Bank. Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal with Mr. Siddharth Sangal, Adv. for respondent/SBI. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT : MS.G.ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE1 The short question that arises for consideration in this petition is whether the condition of making pre-deposit in terms of the second proviso to Section 18 (1) of Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short Securitisation Act), is mandatory even for entertaining an appeal against an order passed by the D...
- ‹ Prev
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- Next ›
- Last »