Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Ram General Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Shabnam and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
$~A-57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 12.2014 + MAC.APP.1106/2014 SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr.Kamaldeep Advocate. versus SHABNAM & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 17.10.2014. The brief facts which led to the accident in question is that deceased Akram on 20.6.2012 was going to Jafrabad Market by Scooter. At 66 Foota Road, Jafrabad, Welcome, Delhi he was hit by a truck stated to be driven in a rash and negligent manner. The deceased suffered grievous injuries and died in the course of his treatment.2. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal concluded that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the truck.3. On compensation the Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs.12,09,060/-. Loss of dependency of Rs.10,74,060/- was awarded. Non p...
Lakshmi Chand Singal (Decd) Thr Lrs Vs. Tara Chand (Decd) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.1434/2011 & C.M. Nos.22392/2011 & 6396/2014 10th December, 2014 % LAKSHMI CHAND SINGAL (DECD) THR LRS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. V Pal Singal. versus TARA CHAND (DECD) THR LRS Through ..... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the plaintiff in the suit, impugning the order dated 18.8.2011 of the trial Court, which has refused to recall the order dated 14.01.2009 by which the right of evidence of the plaintiff was closed. I may note that the subject suit is of 1975 vintage i.e. the suit is around 40 years old.2. Impugned order records that evidence of the petitioner was closed back in 1998. Thereafter High Court granted one opportunity to the petitioner to lead evidence but still evidence was not led in spite of eight opportunities and thereafter right to evidence of the pla...
Veni Mehta Vs. Uma Shankar Sitani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :19. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :10. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 2388/2010 VENI MEHTA ..... Plaintiff Through : Ms.Deeksha L.Kakar, Advocate. VERSUS UMA SHANKAR SITANI Through : ..... Defendant Mr.Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff has instituted the present suit for recovery of `21,90,000/- along with pendente-lite and future interest. Case of the plaintiff as set up in the plaint is as under :2. The defendant was introduced to the plaintiff by a common family friend. Thereafter, he approached her for a loan of ` 25 lacs urging compelling family exigencies assuring to return it within six months along with interest @ 24% per annum. She advanced the loan of ` 25 lacs by issuing cheque No.441417 dated 05.12.2005 drawn on ING Vysya Bank, in the presence of her husband Mr.Ved Prakash Mehta. The said cheque was duly encashed by the defendant. In the first week of May, 2006, she re...
Sonvir @ Somvir Thr. His Father Pappu Singh Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 05, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 10, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1046/2014 KHALIL AHMED Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.B.S. Joon, Mr.A.S. Tokas, Mr.Varun Chugh and Mr.Siddharth Joon, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: + ..... Respondent Ms.Asha Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Anand Yadav, PS Jamia Nagar. CRL.A. 1300/2014 SONVIR @ SOMVIR THR. HIS FATHER PAPPU SINGH ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Ravindra Narayan, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sahani, APP for the State with Insp.Anand Yadav, PS Jamia Nagar. CRL.A. 1506/2014 SULTAN @ RAJESH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Alamgir, Advocate versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Asha Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Anand Yadav, PS Jamia Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Khalil Ahm...
Voltas Ltd Vs. Ncc Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1117/2014 % Judgment Reserved on:02. 12.2014 Judgement pronounced on:10. 12.2014 ..... Petitioner VOLTAS LTD Through: Mr.P.K.Sharma and Mr.Sanjay Grover, Advocates versus NCC LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Priya Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the relief that respondent No.1 be restrained from invoking three bank guarantees bearing Nos.999513BG0002397, 0999513BG0002398 and 0999513BG0002399 all dated 24.09.2013 of the following nature:S.No.Date i) 24.09.2013 ii) 24.09.2013 iii) 24.09.2013 OMP11172014 Description Mobilization Bank Guarantee Performance Bank Guarantee Retention Bank Guarantee Total Rs. Amount 1,30,56,750.00 1,09,50,000.00 99,50,000.00 2. The admitted facts of the case are that respondent No.1 was formerly known as Nagarjuna Construction Compan...
the Cooperative Store Limited Vs. Ramesh Chander
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 10, 2014 + W.P.(C) 2669/2011 THE COOPERATIVE STORE LIMITED Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Prerna Mehta, Adv. Versus RAMESH CHANDER Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Rajiv Aggarwal and Mr.Sachin Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner/Management seeks quashing of the impugned award dated 08.12.2010 passed by learned Tribunal in I.D. No.127-10/95, whereby directed the petitioner/Management to pay lump sum compensation for an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rs. Two Lac) in favour of respondent No.1 in lieu of reinstatement and back wages.2. The case of the respondent/workman before the labour Court was that he joined as Junior Supervisor on 12.07.1966. He had unblemished service record. He was given a charge-sheet on 04.07.1988. He replied the charge-sheet. However, an inquiry was held. A show-cause notice was issued thereafter. He was removed...
Ram Prakash Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1363 of 2014 Reserved on: November 27, 2014 Decision on: December 10, 2014 RAM PRAKASH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Naveen Gaur, Mr. Vijay Gaur and Mr. Raj Jaiswal, Advocates. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1012.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 2nd July 2014 passed by the learned Special Judge in SC No.68 of 2011 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 20(b) (ii) (C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS), and the order on sentence dated 8th July 2014 sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 11 years and to pay fine of Rs. 1.25 lakhs and in default to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for six months. The case of the prosecution 2. ASI Mahender Singh PW-9 stated that on 4th June, 2011, at around 1.30 pm a secret informer conveyed to him that Ram Prakash (the Appellant), resident...
Gaon Sabha Libaspur Welfare Association Through It Vs. Govt. of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3201/2014 & CM No.6659/2014 (for stay) GAON SABHA LIBASPUR WELFARE ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikramjit Saini, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amitabh Marwah, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL), impugns the allotment of Khasra Nos.23/21, 24/25, 31/1 and 31/10 of village Libaspur, District North-West by the Director (Panchayat), Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) vide letter dated 7th July, 2012 to the Directorate of Education and seeks a direction to the respondent GNCTD to, out of the aforesaid land leave out land in Khasra Nos.23/21 and 24/25 ad-measuring 7 Bighas and 7 Biswas for construction of Multi Purpose Community...
Ayureved Rugnalaya Vs. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 10th December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 8736/2014 AYUREVED RUGNALAYA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K.Gupta, Adv. Versus ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Abhinav Ashok and Mr. Arvind Verma, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner seeks modification of the order dated 15.09.2014 passed by the learned Tribunal. He further seeks directions thereby directing the Tribunal to hear the appeal on merits without insisting the pre-deposit.2. The petitioner has been asked to pay damages under Section 14B of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 for the period March, 2002 to February, 2009.3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner filed an appeal bearing No.ATA87709) 2014 wherein vide order dated 15.09.2014 the learned Tribunal directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.10 lacs as pre-deposit and the ap...
Hardeep Johar & Ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Represented By: Secreta ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-10-2014
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 4321/2014 HARDEEP JOHAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Ms.Tara V. Ganju, Advocate. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY: SECRETARY ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Amiet Andlay, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 6. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioners are aggrieved with the demarcation report dated 31.01.2014, which was carried out pursuant to order dated 20.01.2014 passed by the Tehsildar, Saket, New Delhi.2. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that two suits have been decided in favour of the petitioners and the third suit is still pending before this Court. Despite, the aforesaid demarcation has been carried out maliciously on the complaint of Sh. Hari Kishan S/o Sh. Ram Karan without issuing notice to the petitioners.3. In short affidavit filed by t...
- ‹ Prev
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- Next ›
- Last »