Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Adarsh Gramodhyog Samiti Vs. Khadi and Village Industries Commission T ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.1319/2010 11th December , 2014 % ADARSH GRAMODHYOG SAMITI ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Kumar and Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Advocate. VERSUS KHADI & VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION THROUGH ITS STATE DIRECTOR AND ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. J.M. Sabharwal, Senior Advocate with Mr. G.K. Srivastava, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the heading of the petition reads as under:PETITION UNDER ARTICLE227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA CHALLENGING THE REPORT DATED19.2010 OF THE ONE MAN TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED BY THE MINISTRY OF MICRO SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISE VIDE NOTIFICATION NO.S.O. 1399 (E) DATED9H JUNE20102. The reliefs which are claimed in this writ petition are as under:- On the facts mentioned and premise set forth hereinabove, it is mos...
Chhavi Grover and Ors. Vs. Navyug School Educational Society and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3808/2012 & CM Nos. 7984/2012 & 3474/2013, W.P.(C) 3809/2012 & CM Nos.7985/2012, 3480/2013, W.P.(C) 3810/2012 & CM Nos. 3478/2013, 11079/2012, 7986/2012 , W.P.(C) 3811/2012 & CM Nos. 7987/2012, 3483/2013, W.P.(C) 3812/2012 & CM Nos. 7988/2012, 3479/2013, W.P.(C) 3813/2012 & CM Nos.7989/2012, 11108/2012, 3475/2013, W.P.(C) 3814/2012 & CM Nos. 7990/2012, 3477/2013, W.P.(C) 3815/2012 & CM Nos.3481/2013, 7991/2012, W.P.(C) 3816/2012 & CM Nos.7992/2012, 3482/2013, W.P.(C) 3818/2012 & 3476/2013, 8000/2012 & W.P.(C) 3969/2012 & 8313/2012 CHHAVI GROVER AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3808/2012 MEERA DAWAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3809/2012 VIKAS PALIWAL AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3810/2012 MADHU BHANDARI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3811/2012 RASHMI JS THAPA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3812/2012 KUSUM SINGH AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in ...
M/S Gvr Infra Projects Limited Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8090/2014 & CM No.18881/2014 M/S GVR INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Pragyan Sharma, Ms Tareha A. Khan, Ms Niyati Kohli and Mr Nitikesh. For the Respondents : Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R-1/UOI. Mr Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms Meenakshi Sood and Mr Mukesh Kumar for NHAI. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns a communication dated 11.11.2014 issued by respondent no.2 (hereafter referred to as the impugned communication) whereby the petitioner was informed that its financial bid submitted for securing the contract in question had not been opened. The petitioner was informed that its bid was not considered as the World Bank had sanctioned procedures against the petitioner w.e.f. 09.04.2014 and had temporarily s...
Shiv Shakti Madan Vs. M/S New Ways Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :11. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1980/2011 & CC No.21/2012 SHIV SHAKTI MADAN Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.V.K.Nagrath, Mr.Abhay Varma & Mr.Sidhant Kapur, Advocates. VERSUS M/S NEW WAYS PROJECTS PVT. LTD. Through : ..... Defendant None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Shiv Shakti Madan has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 31,31,085/- along with pendente-lite and future interest @ 15% per annum.2. Plaintiffs case as reflected in the plaint is that on 29.01.2008, she entered into an Agreement to Sell with defendant regarding purchase of the entire first floor of the property bearing No.51/40, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi-60 for a total consideration of ` 75 lacs. ` 45,50,000/were paid to the defendant as part payment in terms of the Agreement to Sell as detailed in para No.4 of the plaint. Further payment of `1,50,000/was made...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S Nirmal Bot Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:11. 12.2014 + OMP15652014 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... PETITIONER Versus M/S. NIRMAL BOT LTD. ..... RESPONDENT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Karunesh Tandon, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala and Ms. Malavika Lal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) whereby, a challenge has been laid to the award dated 14.08.2014, passed by the learned arbitrator.2. The three member arbitral tribunal unanimously ruled in favour of the respondent that it was entitled to bonus in terms of the contract executed between the parties herein, on account of expedited execution of the work entrusted under the contract. On this score, the respondent has been awarded a sum of Rs.13,22,22,222/- with interest at ...
Ankit Sharma and Ors Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4003/2014 ANKIT SHARMA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr Gagan Gupta, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Anil Deswal, PS Swaroop Nagar. Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.251/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406 IPC at Police Station Swaroop Nagar on 18th October, 2013, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Neelam Sharma are present in person and are also identified by ...
Today Homes and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jitender Singh and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:25. 09.2014 Judgment delivered on:11. 12.2014 + OMP132012 TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... PETITIONER Versus JITENDER SINGH AND ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pooja Mehra Saigal, Mr. Jitender Ratta and Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Siddhartha Tanwar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) whereby, a challenge has been laid to the award dated 26.08.2011 passed by the learned arbitrator.2. The facts obtaining in the matter fall in a narrow compass. 2.1 The petitioner, which will hereafter be referred to as, Today Homes, entered into a concession agreement with an entity by the name of Ludhiana Improvement Trust (hereinafter referred to in short as LIT). LIT...
Rajender Singh Vs. Uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 8200/2011 RAJENDER SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Aggarwal and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates. Versus UOI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.S.M.Arif, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present petition is directed against the impugned award dated 30.09.2010, passed by ld. Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, Delhi, in I.D. No.28/2009, whereby the ld. Tribunal has not directed the respondent / Management to regularize the services of the petitioner after taking into account his initial date of joining.2. The petitioner joined the services of the respondent / Management w.e.f. 03.04.1984 as a daily wager, however his services were terminated on 08.03.1996.3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner raised an industrial dispute and vide first award dated 07.07.2000, petitioner was reinstated in service with continuity of service and full back w...
Satish Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h December, 2014 + CRL.A.633/2013 & Crl. MB. 2241/2013, Crl. MA.2623/2014 & Crl. MB. 1407/2013 SATISH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Mousam Chani, PS Mayur Vihar % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA : SUNITA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 06.05.2013 and order on sentence dated 10.05.2013 in Sessions Case No.31/12 arising out of FIR No.323/10 whereby the appellant was convicted u/s 307/452 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 5 years with fine of Rs.5,000/- u/s 307 IPC in default to undergo 6 months SI and 3 years RI with fine of Rs.5,000/- u/s 452 IPC in default to undergo 6 months SI, present appeal has been preferred.2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the appellant under instructions from the appellant submitted that he does n...
Yoginder Singh Verma Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :03.12.2014 Pronounced on :11.12.2014 % + W.P.(CRL) 265/2013 & CRL.M.A. 2178/2013 YOGINDER SINGH VERMA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Maninder Singh, Adv. with Mr.Sanjay Chaubey, Mr.Dinhar Takiar, Mr.Prateek Sisodia, Mr.Jaskaran Sibia and Ms.Aekta Vats, Advs. versus CBI Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing Counsel for the CBI. AND + W.P.(CRL) 1739/2013 & CRL.M.A. 15883/2013 YOGINDER SINGH VERMA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Maninder Singh, Adv. with Mr.Sanjay Chaubey, Mr.Dinhar Takiar, Mr.Prateek Sisodia, Mr.Jaskaran Sibia and Ms.Aekta Vats, Advs. versus CBI Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing Counsel for the CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The Petitioner before this Court appears to be of the nature of litigants that find mention in Santosh De & Anr. vs. Archana Guhar & Ors. (1994) 2 SCC420 The observation made by the Apex Court in para 15 of the report d...
- ‹ Prev
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- Next ›
- Last »