Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ritu Mehra and Ors. Vs. Navyug School Educational Society & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3815/2012 RITU MEHRA AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms. Punam Singh, Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, Ms. Shruti Munjal, Ms. Ankita Patnaik and Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocates. Versus NAVYUG SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. B.B.Gupta and Mr. Udyan Srivastava, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, ASC for Respondent No.2/NDMC. Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. M.P.Singh, Advocates for Union of India. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.For detailed order see W.P.(C) No.3808/2012. SURESH KAIT (JUDGE) DECEMBER11 2014 sb...
Ankit Sharma and Ors Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4003/2014 ANKIT SHARMA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr Gagan Gupta, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Anil Deswal, PS Swaroop Nagar. Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.251/2013 registered under Sections 498A/406 IPC at Police Station Swaroop Nagar on 18th October, 2013, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively.3. Petitioners as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Neelam Sharma are present in person and are also identified by ...
Today Homes and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Jitender Singh and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:25. 09.2014 Judgment delivered on:11. 12.2014 + OMP132012 TODAY HOMES & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. ..... PETITIONER Versus JITENDER SINGH AND ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Pooja Mehra Saigal, Mr. Jitender Ratta and Ms. Jasmine Kottai, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Siddhartha Tanwar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) whereby, a challenge has been laid to the award dated 26.08.2011 passed by the learned arbitrator.2. The facts obtaining in the matter fall in a narrow compass. 2.1 The petitioner, which will hereafter be referred to as, Today Homes, entered into a concession agreement with an entity by the name of Ludhiana Improvement Trust (hereinafter referred to in short as LIT). LIT...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S Nirmal Bot Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:11. 12.2014 + OMP15652014 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... PETITIONER Versus M/S. NIRMAL BOT LTD. ..... RESPONDENT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr. Karunesh Tandon, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala and Ms. Malavika Lal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is a petition preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) whereby, a challenge has been laid to the award dated 14.08.2014, passed by the learned arbitrator.2. The three member arbitral tribunal unanimously ruled in favour of the respondent that it was entitled to bonus in terms of the contract executed between the parties herein, on account of expedited execution of the work entrusted under the contract. On this score, the respondent has been awarded a sum of Rs.13,22,22,222/- with interest at ...
Shiv Shakti Madan Vs. M/S New Ways Projects Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :11. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1980/2011 & CC No.21/2012 SHIV SHAKTI MADAN Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.P.V.Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.V.K.Nagrath, Mr.Abhay Varma & Mr.Sidhant Kapur, Advocates. VERSUS M/S NEW WAYS PROJECTS PVT. LTD. Through : ..... Defendant None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Shiv Shakti Madan has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 31,31,085/- along with pendente-lite and future interest @ 15% per annum.2. Plaintiffs case as reflected in the plaint is that on 29.01.2008, she entered into an Agreement to Sell with defendant regarding purchase of the entire first floor of the property bearing No.51/40, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi-60 for a total consideration of ` 75 lacs. ` 45,50,000/were paid to the defendant as part payment in terms of the Agreement to Sell as detailed in para No.4 of the plaint. Further payment of `1,50,000/was made...
M/S Gvr Infra Projects Limited Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8090/2014 & CM No.18881/2014 M/S GVR INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED .....Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr Pragyan Sharma, Ms Tareha A. Khan, Ms Niyati Kohli and Mr Nitikesh. For the Respondents : Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for R-1/UOI. Mr Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms Meenakshi Sood and Mr Mukesh Kumar for NHAI. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns a communication dated 11.11.2014 issued by respondent no.2 (hereafter referred to as the impugned communication) whereby the petitioner was informed that its financial bid submitted for securing the contract in question had not been opened. The petitioner was informed that its bid was not considered as the World Bank had sanctioned procedures against the petitioner w.e.f. 09.04.2014 and had temporarily s...
Chhavi Grover and Ors. Vs. Navyug School Educational Society and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December11, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3808/2012 & CM Nos. 7984/2012 & 3474/2013, W.P.(C) 3809/2012 & CM Nos.7985/2012, 3480/2013, W.P.(C) 3810/2012 & CM Nos. 3478/2013, 11079/2012, 7986/2012 , W.P.(C) 3811/2012 & CM Nos. 7987/2012, 3483/2013, W.P.(C) 3812/2012 & CM Nos. 7988/2012, 3479/2013, W.P.(C) 3813/2012 & CM Nos.7989/2012, 11108/2012, 3475/2013, W.P.(C) 3814/2012 & CM Nos. 7990/2012, 3477/2013, W.P.(C) 3815/2012 & CM Nos.3481/2013, 7991/2012, W.P.(C) 3816/2012 & CM Nos.7992/2012, 3482/2013, W.P.(C) 3818/2012 & 3476/2013, 8000/2012 & W.P.(C) 3969/2012 & 8313/2012 CHHAVI GROVER AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3808/2012 MEERA DAWAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3809/2012 VIKAS PALIWAL AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3810/2012 MADHU BHANDARI AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3811/2012 RASHMI JS THAPA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in W.P.(C) No.3812/2012 KUSUM SINGH AND ORS. ..... Petitioners in ...
Ashok Kumar Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.1608/2012 Date of decision:11. h December, 2014 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.M.P. Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to Cr.P.C.), the petitioner assailed order dated 15.11.2011 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi whereby the charges punishable under Sections 447/509 IPC were framed against the petitioner.2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that respondent No.2/ Smt. Kamla Devi filed a complaint on the allegations inter alia that the complainant is residing on the ground floor of property bearing No.2183/7, Shora Kothi, Subzi Mandi, Delhi and the petitioner No.1/accused persons had ...
Ashok Kumar Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.1608/2012 Date of decision:11. h December, 2014 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anil Kumar, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.M.P. Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to Cr.P.C.), the petitioner assailed order dated 15.11.2011 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi whereby the charges punishable under Sections 447/509 IPC were framed against the petitioner.2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that respondent No.2/ Smt. Kamla Devi filed a complaint on the allegations inter alia that the complainant is residing on the ground floor of property bearing No.2183/7, Shora Kothi, Subzi Mandi, Delhi and the petitioner No.1/accused persons had ...
Shish Ram Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-11-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 11,2014 + CRL.A. 234/2013 SHISH RAM Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ravi Chaturvedi, Advocate for the appellant with appellant in J.C. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Mahesh Kumar, PS S.B.Dairy Complainant Smt.Preeti Sharma in person with Mr.Ajay Garg, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. There are seven deadly sins : wrath, avarice, sloth, pride, lust, envy and drunkenness. But in the modern society we find that some of them have contrived to pass themselves off as virtues. For instance avarice has rebaptized itself as thrift and pride as self-respect. Envy claims to be the corner-stone upon which the present eras competitive system is founded. But one out of the seven vices continues to be unfortunate. It remains undisguised and does not even make an atte...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »