Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Heera Lal @ Heera Vs. State Govt. of Nct
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 08, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 12, 2014 % + CRL.A. 979/2012 HEERA LAL @ HEERA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Shiv Chopra and Ms.Megha, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Rajeev Vimal, PS Kalyan Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Heera Lal is convicted of the offence of robbery and murder of Jagan Singh Chauhan and awarded imprisonment for life.2. The case of prosecution rest on circumstantial evidence in the form of statements of Umesh Chauhan PW-1 and Tushar Chauhan PW-2 having last seen Heera Lal with the deceased on the night of June 07, 2010, recovery of shirt of Heera Lal which was found to be blood stained with human blood of B group origin which tallied with that of deceased and the recovery of weapon of offence an iron r...
M/S Unitel Technology (India) Pvt Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Smp International ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :25. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :12. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS(OS) 1532/2011 & CRL.M.A.No.16770/2012 M/S UNITEL TECHNOLOGY (INDIA) PVT LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through : Mr.Manu K.Giri, Advocate. VERSUS SMP INTERNATIONAL & ORS. ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Ashok K.Juneja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P. GARG, J.1. The plaintiffs M/s. Unitel Technology (India) Pvt. Ltd. & anr. have filed the instant suit for recovery of ` 41 lacs.2. Plaintiffs case is that a production unit at SDF No.E-17, Noida Export Processing Zone to repair and refuberish telephones was set up. The plaintiff company was 100% export oriented unit. However, it got special permission and licence to sell products in India. Defendants No.1 & 2 used to sell products i.e. telephones on behalf of the plaintiffs company in India. Defendant No.3 used to receive goods on behalf of the defendant No.2. These facts have been admitted in the cross-exami...
Lekan Akins Vs. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.483 of 2014 Reserved on: December 1, 2014 Decision on: December 12, 2014 LEKAN AKINS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.S. Kushwaha, Advocate. versus THE STATE (N.C.T of Delhi) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1212.2014 Introduction 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the impugned judgment dated 18th January 2014 passed by the learned Special Judge, Delhi in Session Case No.14/11 convicting the Appellant, Lekan Akins, for the offence under Section 21 (c) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (NDPS Act) and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act (FA) and the order on sentence dated 24th January 2014 whereby for the offence under Section 21 (c) NDPS Act the Appellant had been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for a period of ten years and fine of Rs. 1 lakh, and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for a period of two years and for the offence unde...
Sahil Sachdeva Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7374/2014 & CM APPL. 17237/2014 SAHIL SACHDEVA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate with Mr. Ayush Arora and Ms. Aastha Chopra, Advoates. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Advocate with Mr. Sradhananda Mohapatra and Mr. Vipin Singh, Advocates for GGSIPU. Reserved on :20. h November, 2014 Date of Decision :12. h December, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the respondent No.1- Universitys action of not allotting a seat to the petitioner in his preferred course option viz. BBA LL.B. in the supplementary counselling conducted by the respondent No.1-University on 20th October, 2014 pursuant to the respondent No.1-Universitys Notification dated 16th October, 2014. Petitioner has also sought a direction to respondent No.1-University to allot a seat to the petitioner in BBA LL.B. Cou...
Radhey Shyam Bagla (Since Deceased) Thr. Lrs Vs. Smt Ratni Devi Kahnan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 12.2013 Pronounced on:12. 12.2014 + RFA (OS) 5/1982 RADHEY SHYAM BAGLA (SINCE DECEASED) THR. LRS ..... Appellants Through: Sh. Suryakant Singla, Advocate. Versus SMT. RATNI DEVI KAHNANI (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Rajeev Sharma with Sh. Harmeet Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in Suit No.446 of 1967, dated 10.12.1981, i.e., by which the learned Single Judge had granted a preliminary decree of partition.2. At the outset, it is essential to trace the relationships between the various parties involved. The core issue in the judgment of the Single Judge turned upon the reading of the will of one Seth Ram Lal Khemka. Seth Ram Lal Khemka had a sister, Smt. Godavari Devi. The appellant, Shri Radhey Shyam Bagla (first ...
Ranjeet Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
$~5, 6 &13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 12, 2014 + CRL.A. 1317/2014 RANJEET KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector K.K.Tiwari, PS Tughlak Road. CRL.A. 1440/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector K.K.Tiwari, PS Tughlak Road. versus RANJEET KUMAR & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. CRL.A. 1487/2014 KANHAIYA & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A. 1317/2014 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.10565/2014 in Crl.A.1317/2014 Crl.M.B.10849-50/2014 in Crl.A.1487/2014 Since ...
M/S. Patel Roadways Ltd. Vs. P.O. Industrial Tribunal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8545/2003 M/S. PATEL ROADWAYS LTD. ..... Petitioner versus P.O. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr M. Y. Khan. For the Respondent : Ms Rashmi B. Singh. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns an order dated 01.10.2003 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Industrial Tribunal whereby the domestic enquiry conducted by the petitioner against respondent no.2 workman was vitiated and the report of the enquiry officer was held to be perverse.2. Briefly stated, the relevant facts for examining the controversy in the present petition are that respondent no.2 was working as MIS Executive (i.e. Management Information System Executive) with the petitioner. On 30.11.1993, the petitioner suspended respondent no.2 and issued a charge sheet dated 01.02.1994 alleging that respondent no.2 caused the Divisio...
Frank Kingsley Ugochukwu and Anr. Vs. Directorate of Revenue Intellige ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t December 2014 Decision on:12th December 2014 CRL.A. No.1173 of 2010 FRANK KINGSLEY UGOCHUKWU & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Yogesh Saxena, Advocate. versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..........Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1212.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 14th July 2010 passed by the learned Special Judge in SC No.26-A/2006 convicting the Appellants under Section 21(c) and Section 29 read with Section 21 of the Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) and the order on sentence dated 17th July 2010 whereby each of them were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) of ten years and fine of Rs.1,00,000 each and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for each of the offences under Section 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act. The sentences were directed to run concurrently. The case of the prose...
M.B. Exim Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Export Inspection Agency, Ministry of Commerce ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8595/2014 M.B. EXIM PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner versus EXPORT INSPECTION AGENCY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Anuj Tyagi and Mr Nishit Agrawal. For the Respondents : Mr L. R. Khatana for R-1 & 2. Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under:Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to release the certificates of inspection for the samples of consignments corresponding to invoice No.MB-017/201415 and MB-018/2014-15 both dated 11.06.2014, submitted by the Petitioner. 2. The petitioner is, inter alia, engaged in the business of exporting honey and is also a recognized export house. It is alleged by the respondents that the petitioner had exported 120 containers of honey wit...
Kanhaiya and Anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2014
$~5, 6 &13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 12, 2014 + CRL.A. 1317/2014 RANJEET KUMAR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: + ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector K.K.Tiwari, PS Tughlak Road. CRL.A. 1440/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector K.K.Tiwari, PS Tughlak Road. versus RANJEET KUMAR & ORS Represented by: + ..... Respondents Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. CRL.A. 1487/2014 KANHAIYA & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Ajay Verma and Ms.Neha Singh, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: CRL.A. 1317/2014 & conn.matters ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.B.10565/2014 in Crl.A.1317/2014 Crl.M.B.10849-50/2014 in Crl.A.1487/2014 Since ...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »