Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ehtiram Hussain Ansari and Ors Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5678/2014 EHTIRAM HUSSAIN ANSARI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Md. Qmar Ali, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Sahib Singh, PS Jagat Puri. Mr. Farooq Ahmed, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % ORDER1512.2014 Crl. M.A. 19417/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5678/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.440/2010 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Jagat Puri on 25th December, 2010 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Farooq Ahmed, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on beh...
Pankaj Kapur Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 7696/2014 .... Petitioner PANKAJ KAPUR versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr B.S.Maan, Mr Vishal Maan and Mr Aditya Singh, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for R-4 & R-5. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2 has been handed over by Mr Yeeshu Jain. The same is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file the rejoinder affidavit and would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came int...
Ravi Seikhar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h December, 2014 + CRL.A. 1063/2011 RAVI SEIKHAR Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. K. K. Manan, Adv. STATE Through: + CRL.A. 1274/2011 MOHD.TARIQULLAH Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + .... Appellant Mr. Abdul Sattar, Adv. ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Jitender Police Station Kalkaji CRL.A. 1078/2011 MOHD.RIZWAN Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Jitender Police Station Kalkaji ..... Appellant Mr. Abdul Sattar, Adv. ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Jitender Police Station Kalkaji CRL.A. 1081/2011 AFZAL HUSSAIN Through: versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: Crl.A.1063, 1274, 1078,1081/2011 & 1010/2012 ..... Appellant Mr. Abdul Sattar, Adv. ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Additional Public Prosec...
Welcome International Vs. Venezia Lethers Limited and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:15. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) No.1997/2012 WELCOME INTERNATIONAL Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Raj Kamal, Adv. with Mr.Gulshan Taneja, Adv. versus VENEZIA LETHERS LIMITED & ORS Through None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a suit for recovery under Order XXXVII CPC filed by the plaintiff for a sum of Rs.31,31,225.04 along with pendente lite and future interest against the defendants.2. Brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of footwears (shoes) and shoe accessories. Defendant No.2 to 4 are directors of the defendant No.1 company engaged in the wholesale business in the name and style of M/s Venezia Leathers Limited on the margin of profit and re-seller of the products purchased from the plaintiff and some other producers.3. It is stated that the defendant No.1 approached the plaintiff and placed confirmed purc...
Gaurav Grover and Anr Vs. The State (the Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5680/2014 GAURAV GROVER & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Neena Mathur, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE (THE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for the State with W/ASI Suman Lata, PS Vivek Vihar. Ms. Madhu Mittal, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 19419/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5680/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.254/2014 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Vivek Vihar on 8th April, 2014 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor and Ms. Madhu Mittal, Advocate enter appearance and ac...
Union of India and Ors. Vs. Rumal Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 15, 2014 + RSA332012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: .....Appellants Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms. Shipra Shukla Advocate versus RUMAL SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Niraj Jha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned order of 22nd October, 2011 refuses to condone the delay of 103 days in filing of the accompanying appeal by observing that there is no reasonable or sufficient ground to condone the delay, while relying upon ratio of Apex Courts decision in Lanka Venkateswarlu (Dead) by LRs. v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors., (2011) 4 SCC363 The factual background of this case already stands noted in the judgment of the trial court, who had decreed respondents suit. The charge against respondent, who was working as Sub-Inspector with the Central Reserve Police Force in 20th Battalion at Srinagar, was that he had fired a fatal shot at Constable-Mohinder Singh. The stand of r...
Anubhav Kathuria Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
$~ 54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:15. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 7773/2014 ANUBHAV KATHURIA .... Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Adv.with Mr Makhan & Mr D.R. Kaushik For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi. Mr Arjun Pant for DDA. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE I. S. MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. An additional affidavit handed over by Mr Jain on behalf of respondent no.2 is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit and would be relying on the averments made in the writ petition.2. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. W.P....
Commissioner of Service Tax Vs. Japan Airlines International Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 15, 2014 + CEAC612014 COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Sonia Sharma and Ms.Neha Sharma, Advocates versus JAPAN AIRLINES INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD, ...... Respondent Through: Mr.J.K.Mittal, Advocate with Mr.Rajveer Singh and Ms.Swapna Jumde, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J (ORAL) 1. In this appeal filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax, the following substantial question of law stands admitted for hearing:Whether the Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal of the Revenue on the ground that the Committee of the Chief Commissioners had mechanically granted permission for filing of appeal without due application of mind; and whether the said aspect can be examined and made subject matter before the aforesaid Tribunal in an appeal under Section 86 (2) of the Finance Act, 1994?.2. Learned...
Shalu Gill Vs. Joginder Pal Babbar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA5262014, CM Nos.17676-17677/2014 Decided on 15th December, 2014 SHALU GILL Through ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Sharma and Ms. Suman, Advocates Versus JOGINDER PAL BABBAR Through ..... Respondent Mr. Sandeep Khurana, Mr. Manuj Aggarwal and Ms. Seemab Ali Fatima, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. The respondent filed a suit for recovery of possession, permanent injunction, recovery of damages and unpaid rent against the appellant. On an application under Order 12 Rule 6 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as CPC) filed by the respondent, trial court has passed a decree of possession. As regard other reliefs, suit is still pending. Aggreived by the decree of possession, appellant has preferred this appeal.2. The respondent alleged in the plaint that he had let out the DDA Flat No.307, Ground Floor, LIG Category, Pocket-3, Madipur, New Delhi to appellant on a monthly rent of `6,000/- ...
Jai Prakash Sharma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h October, 2014 Date of Decision:15th December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 86/2013 JAI PRAKASH SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of this petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner Mr. Jai Prakash Sharma has assailed the order dated 06.11.2012 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-III (East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi whereby revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. Succinctly stating the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the petitioner filed a complaint against Manoj Pant, SHO P.S. Preet Vihar, ASI Rajbir Singh, Constable Umed Singh and Constable Sorveer Singh for the offence under Sections 341/342/379/365/506/ 323/463/469/471/34 IPC on the allegations, in...
- ‹ Prev
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- Next ›
- Last »