Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nepal Airlines Corporation Vs. Girish Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1402/2010 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ramashankar, Advocate with Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocate. versus GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Through : ..... Defendant. None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Nepal Airlines Corporation formerly known as Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 80,18,000/- with interest pendente-lite and future.2. As per averments in the plaint, the plaintiff carries on its business in India having its principal office at 44, Janpath, New Delhi. The defendant established an enterprise known as Nepal Travel Information Centre, based in Bombay. Subsequently, offices were established in other cities including Delhi at 13/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The plaintiff is an international airline carrying on its business operations in India. In December, 1995, the d...
Good Luck Traders Vs. M/S Yash Associates and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4589/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4597/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus SHREE SHIV SAI STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4598/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4599/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA TMT BARS PV...
Dinesh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4675/2014 DINESH KUMAR & ORS. Through .... Petitioner Mr. R.P.S. Bhatti, Mr. V. S. Panwar and Mr. Uma Shankar, Advocates with the petitioners. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor, Sub Inspector Mahmood Hasan, P.S. Mayur Vihar. Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate with R2and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.249/2013, registered under Sections 308, 323, 34 IPC at police station Mayur Vihar, on 15.07.2013, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2, who is the complainant, and respondent No.3, the injured, enter appearance and accept notice. Respondents 2 and 3, who are present in person, are als...
Good Luck Traders Vs. M/S. Brahmaputra Tmt Bars Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4589/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4597/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus SHREE SHIV SAI STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4598/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4599/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA TMT BARS PV...
Sachin Harjai and Ors Vs. The State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5714/2014 SACHIN HARJAI & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Sanchit Dhawan & Ms. Nisha Mohandas, Advocates with petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 in person versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP with SI Amit Kumar, PS Punjabi Bagh Ms. Sunita, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 19499/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5714/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.335/2010 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Punjabi Bagh on 11th November, 2010 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Ms. Sunita, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on be...
Praveen Bhutani Vs. Smt Usha Sethi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 12.2014 + CRL.REV.P. 317/2014 PRAVEEN BHUTANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rajiv Vig, Advocate versus SMT USHA SETHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.S.K.Rungta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Shivam Batra Advocate for R-1. Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for State/R-2 S.I. Ishwar Singh, P.S. Hazrat Nizamuddin. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a petition under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the petitioner challenging the legality and proprietary of the impugned order dated 15th March, 2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge allowed the application of respondent No.1 for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal No.11/2013 under Section 372 Cr.P.C.2. It is the submission of learned senior counsel for the peti...
Avtec Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 1874/2014 and CM No.3915/2014 AVTEC LIMITED ... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Salil Kapoor, Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Varun Gupta For the Respondent : Mr Balbir Singh and Mr Abhishek Singh Baghel CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the notice dated 28.03.2013 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) whereby the petitioners assessment for the assessment year 2006-07 is sought to be re-opened. The petition is also directed against the order dated 14.03.2014 whereby the Assessing Officer has rejected the objections raised by the petitioner pursuant to the issuance of the impugned notice dated 28.03.2013.2. The original assessment under Section 143(...
Good Luck Traders Vs. Shree Shiv Sai Steel Industries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4589/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4597/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus SHREE SHIV SAI STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4598/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4599/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA TMT BARS PV...
Good Luck Traders Vs. Shree Shiv Sai Steel Industries Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4589/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4597/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus SHREE SHIV SAI STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4598/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4599/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA TMT BARS PV...
M/S. Calcom Electronics Ltd Vs. The Commissioner of Sales Tax /Vat Del ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~6 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 16, 2014 + + + + ST.APPL. 48/2014 & CM No.13821/2014 M/S. CALCOM ELECTRONICS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Balram Sangal, Advocate versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX /VAT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan, ASC with Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocate ST.APPL. 51/2014 & CM No.14002/2014 M/S. CALCOM ELECTRONICS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Balram Sangal, Advocate versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX / VAT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan, ASC with Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocate ST.APPL. 52/2014 & CM No.14048/2014 M/S. CALCOM ELECTRONICS LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Balram Sangal, Advocate versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX / VAT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan, ASC with Ms.Latika Dutta, Advocate ST.APPL. 59/2014 & CM Nos. 16290-92/2014 M/S. CALCOM VISION LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Balram Sangal, Advocate versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX /...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »