Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shri Ombir Vs. The State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3707/2014 SHRI OMBIR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naresh C. Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with ASI Tej Ram PS Najafgarh. Complainant in person with Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 3707/2014 and Crl. M.A. 12798/2014 (for stay) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.157/2012 registered under Sections 452/506/323/34 IPC at Police Station Najafgarh on 13th May, 2012 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of State/respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively.3. Petitioner as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Sajjan Kumar are pres...
Raghu Nandan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 16, 2014 + CRL.A. 1267/2013 RAGHU NANDAN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Siddhant Srivastava, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Tarkeshwar Singh, SHO PS Nand Nagri with SI Somil Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant, to be fair to him, has nothing much to argue in the instant appeal, which lays a challenge to the decision dated August 01, 2013 passed by the learned Trial Judge convicting the appellant for having murdered his wife and for injuring his daughter Naina with the knife used by him to cause the fatal life threatening injuries to his wife. Vide order on sentence dated August 03, 2013, for the offence of murder, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a direction that the case of the appellant for...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 16, 2014 + W.P.(C) 4309/2013 & CM. No.10006/2013 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for Respondents No.2 to 6. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.W.P.(C) 4309/2013 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside the show-cause notice dated 30.11.2012 issued by the respondent No.4/Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Exemption), orders dated 11.01.2013 and 28.02.2013 passed by the respondent No.4/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I (North) and the showcause notice dated 07.05.2013 issued by the respondent No.6./Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Compliance-II).2. Further seeks declaration that Condition No.25 of Appendix A of Para 27AA of the Employees Prov...
Micromax Informatics Ltd Vs. Shenzhen Oneplus Technology Co Ltd and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Sl Builders Vs. Cpwd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6341/2013 & CM No.13848/2013 ANIL GAMBHIR ..... Petitioner versus CPWD AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6342/2013 & CM No.13849/2013 SL BUILDERS ..... Petitioner versus CPWD AND ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Anand Mishra. For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Saqib, Adv. for R-2 (in W.P.(C) 6341/2013). CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn an Office Memorandum No.DGW/MAN/ 202 dated 15.12.2009 issued by respondent No.1 (hereafter CPWD), whereby outsourcing of day to day maintenance, annual repair and maintenance and special repair etc. pertaining to civil, electrical & horticulture service was declared as a specialised work/item (hereafter referred to as the impugned memorandum).2. The petitioners contend that the impugned memorandum is arbitrary, unreasonable and violates Article...
Sudama Singh and Ors. Vs. Mr Deepak Mohan Spolia and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Cont. Cas (C) No.884/2013 & C.M. No.5530/2014 Decided on :16. h December, 2014 SUDAMA SINGH & ORS. Petitioners Through: Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra & Mr. Syed Musaib, Advocates. Versus MR DEEPAK MOHAN SPOLIA & ORS Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, SC with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC with Ms. Namrata Mukim & Ms. Yoothica Pallavi, Advocates for R-2/SDMC. Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, SC with Mr. Abhilash Vashisht, Advocate for R-3/DUSIB. WITH + Cont. Cas (C) No.821/2014 MAYA DEVI & ORS Through: Petitioners Mr. Ramesh K. Mishra & Mr. Syed Musaib, Advocates. Versus MR DEEPAK MOHAN SPOLIA & ORS Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, SC with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Mini Pushkarna, SC with Ms. Namrata Mukim & Ms. Yoothica Pallavi, Advocates for R-2/SDMC. Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, SC with Mr. Abhilash Vashisht, Advocate for R-3/DUSIB. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present contempt petit...
M/S. Goyal Mg Gases Pvt.Ltd. Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. Nos.4407/2014, 4534/2014, 4535/2014, 4536/2014, 4537/2014, 4538/2014, 4539/2014, 4540/2014, 4541/2014, 4542/2014, 4543/2014, 4544/2014, 4545/2014, 4546/2014, 4547/2014, 4548/2014, 4549/2014, 4550/2014, 4564/2014, 4565/2014, 4567/2014, 4568/2014, 4731/2014, 4556/2014, 4557/2014, 4558/2014, 4559/2014, 4560/2014, 4561/2014, 4562/2014, 4563/2014, 4553/2014, 4554/2014, 4555/2014, 4552/2014, 4551/2014 & 4566/2014 M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey with Mr. Shiv Chopra and Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Ms. Chaitali Jain and Ms. Katyayini, Advocates. Mr. M. P. Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By these petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter after referred to as Cr.P.C....
Ved Prakash Gulati and Ors Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3811/2014 VED PRAKASH GULATI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Malik, Advocate versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for State with SI Raj Pal, Police Station Tilak Nagar Mr. Sameer Dewan, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No.185/2000 registered under Sections 406/498A/34 IPC, at Police Station Tilak Nagar (West), New Delhi, on 15.03.2000 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State, as well as counsel for the second respondent/complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. The second respondent/complainant, Kusum Gulati, is present in person. She is also identified by the Investigating Officer Sub-Inspector Raj Pal, Police Station Tilak Nagar, New Delhi....
Smt. Haseena Begum and Ors Vs. Smt. Quresha Begum
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. No.28/2013 and C.M. Nos.912/2013 (stay), 14659/2013 & 15718/2014 16th December, 2014 % SMT. HASEENA BEGUM AND ORS ......Petitioners Through: Mr. R.L. Kohli, Advocate. VERSUS SMT. QURESHA BEGUM Through: ...... Respondent Ms. Deepika V. Marwaha, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 28.8.2012 by which the Additional Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners/tenants and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the tenanted premises being one dalan (hall) measuring 16X9, part of the ground floor of property no.2192, Gali Nai Wali, Pahari Bhojla, Ba...
Adesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 3543/2014 ADESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Pramod Singh. For the Respondents : Ms Suparna Srivastava, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns an order dated 16.04.2014 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC) rejecting the petitioners appeal against an order dated 14.11.2012 passed by the First Appellate Authority (hereafter FAA). The FAA had, by an order dated 14.11.2012, rejected the appeal filed by the petitioner against the decision of the CPIO denying the information as sought by the petitioner under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act).2. The CPIO had denied the information as sought for by the petitioner claiming that the same was exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(h) of...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »