Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Kumar Arora Vs. Department of Pfa Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1069 of 2008 RAKESH KUMAR ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri with Mr. Ajay Pal Singh and Mr. Prannoy Dey, Advocates. versus DEPARTMENT OF PFA GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1612.2014 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 17th November 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in CC No.66 of 1998 holding the Appellant guilty of the offence under Section 7 punishable under Section 16 (1A) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act) and the order on sentence dated 19th November 2008, sentencing him to two years rigorous imprisonment (RI) with a fine of Rs,5000 and in default to undergo RI for five months.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 6th August 1998 at around 4 pm, Food Inspector (FI) Anil Kumar Dhir (PW-2) purchased a sample of mustard oil from the Appellant from his ...
Good Luck Traders Vs. M/S. Yash Associates and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 4589/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4597/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus SHREE SHIV SAI STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chinmoy Pradip Sharma, Advocate for R-1 to R-4. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4598/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. YASH ASSOCIATES & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gagan Deep Singh, Advocate for R-1 & R-2. Mr. P. K. Saxena, APP for the State. + CRL. M.C. 4599/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus M/S. BRAHMAPUTRA TMT BARS PV...
Abhishek and Ors Vs. Staff Selection Commission and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1204/2014 Decided on : IN THE MATTERS OF : ABHISHEK AND ORS1612.2014 ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advocate versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for R-1 and R-2. Ms. Anuja Masih, Advocate for R-3. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by five petitioners praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notices dated 10.06.2013 and the orders dated 27.01.2014 issued by the respondent No.2/Regional Director (NR) of the respondent No.1/Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder they were informed that their candidatures in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.3/FCI were cancelled and they were debarred for a period of three years from the Commissions ...
Anil Gambhir Vs. Cpwd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6341/2013 & CM No.13848/2013 ANIL GAMBHIR ..... Petitioner versus CPWD AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6342/2013 & CM No.13849/2013 SL BUILDERS ..... Petitioner versus CPWD AND ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Anand Mishra. For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Saqib, Adv. for R-2 (in W.P.(C) 6341/2013). CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn an Office Memorandum No.DGW/MAN/ 202 dated 15.12.2009 issued by respondent No.1 (hereafter CPWD), whereby outsourcing of day to day maintenance, annual repair and maintenance and special repair etc. pertaining to civil, electrical & horticulture service was declared as a specialised work/item (hereafter referred to as the impugned memorandum).2. The petitioners contend that the impugned memorandum is arbitrary, unreasonable and violates Article...
Prakash Dhingra Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4787/2014 PRAKASH DHINGRA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. S.P. Kaushik, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. W/SI Alma Minj, P.S. Sarai Rohilla. Mr. Rajiv Hooda, Advocate with R2 complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.293/2013 under Section 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at police station Sarai Rohilla, on 09.07.2013, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. Rajiv Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.2, enter appearance and accept notice. Respondent No.2, who is present in person, is also identified by the Investigating Officer, W/Sub Inspector Alma Minj.4. The aforesaid FIR is stated to have been lodged by respo...
Bal Kishan Vs. Department of Pfa Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1070 of 2008 BAL KISHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri with Mr. Ajay Pal Singh and Mr. Prannoy Dey, Advocates. versus DEPARTMENT OF PFA GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1612.2014 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 17th November 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in CC No.101 of 1998 holding the Appellant guilty of the offence under Section 7 punishable under Section 16 (1A) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act) and the order on sentence dated 19th November 2008, sentencing him to two years rigorous imprisonment (RI) with a fine of Rs,5000 and in default to undergo RI for five months.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 21st August 1998 at around 1.45 pm, Food Inspector (FI) D.V Singh (PW-2) along with FI R.P Singh (PW-5) purchased a sample of mustard oil from t...
Ram Sajiwan Saroj Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO22012 Decided on 16th December, 2014 RAM SAJIWAN SAROJ Through ..... Appellant Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA Through ..... Respondent Mr. Rajeshwar Singh and Mr. Deepak Sagar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Claim application filed by the appellant seeking compensation of `10 lacs under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (the Act, for short), has been dismissed by the Railway Claim Tribunal, vide order dated 16.08.2011. Aggrieved by this order the appellant has preferred this appeal.2. Appellant alleged in the claim application that he boarded Gorakhdham Express at Shakurbasti Railway Station for going to Amethi in Uttar Pradesh on 15.09.2009 after purchasing a valid ticket. Due to the sudden jerk of the train, he fell down from train at the platform itself and his left leg was amputated at Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital where he was taken for treatment after the incident.3. Responden...
Abhishek Vs. University of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8933/2014 and CM APPL. 20442/2014 IN THE MATTER OF: ABHISHEK Decided on :16. 12.2014 ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the order dated 24.11.2014 issued by the respondents/University, cancelling the offer of appointment issued to him for the post of Junior Assistant with immediate effect.2. The brief facts, as stated in the writ petition, are that on 06.11.2013, the respondents/University had invited applications from eligible candidates for different posts including that of Junior Assistants. In response to the aforesaid advertisement, the petitioner had applied for the subject post on 23.02.2014. The selection process structured by the r...
Anil Kumar Bana Vs. Chairman/Md, Food Corporation of India (Hq) and Or
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 532/2014 Reserved on :20. 11.2014 Pronounced on :16. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: ANIL KUMAR BANA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate with Ms. E.J.Ahuja, Advocate versus CHAIRMAN/MD, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (HQ) AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajit Pudussery, Advocate with Ms. Shruti Sarma Hazarika, Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh and Mr. O.P. Singh, Advocates CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying inter alia for quashing the order dated 15.09.2011, whereunder his request for appointment on compassionate grounds upon the demise of his father, Shri Rajpal Singh was turned down by the respondents/FCI.2. A perusal of the impugned order dated 15.09.2011 reveals that the petitioners candidature for a category IV post in the year 2005 was examined on merits by the Zonal Empowered Committee and was rejected on the ground that there was no vacancy within the ceili...
Satpal Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :10.12.2014 Judgment delivered on :16.12.2014 CRL.REV.P. 882/2002 SATPAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sunil K.Mittal, Mr.Harsh Khanna and Mr.Anshul Mittal, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. Mr.Vijay Aggarwal, Ms.Chaitali Jain and Ms.Katyayini, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This revision petition is directed against the order dated 11.7.2002 passed by the High Court wherein the Sessions Judge on a remand by the High Court (in terms of the order of the High Court dated 08.10.2001) had, on the ground of maintainability, dismissed the petition. 2 Record shows that two cross FIRs had been registered qua the same incident of 27.10.1988, at police station Keshav Puram. In FIR No.182/1988, the complainant was Pritam Dass (respondent no.2 in the present case). In the second FIR which is FIR No.2/1989, the complainant was Satpa...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »