Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Praveen Bhutani Vs. Smt Usha Sethi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 12.2014 + CRL.REV.P. 317/2014 PRAVEEN BHUTANI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rajiv Vig, Advocate versus SMT USHA SETHI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.S.K.Rungta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Shivam Batra Advocate for R-1. Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP for State/R-2 S.I. Ishwar Singh, P.S. Hazrat Nizamuddin. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This is a petition under Section 397 r/w Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the petitioner challenging the legality and proprietary of the impugned order dated 15th March, 2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge allowed the application of respondent No.1 for condonation of delay in filing the Appeal No.11/2013 under Section 372 Cr.P.C.2. It is the submission of learned senior counsel for the peti...
Ms. Babita Kadian Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8366/2014 MS. BABITA KADIAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajan Sabharwal & Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER1612.2014 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to the respondents for considering her candidature for appointment to the post of Constable (RPF) 2011, against the OBC category alongwith all the consequential benefits accruing therefrom. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner belongs to the OBC category. She had applied for the post of Constable (Female)/RPF against OBC category in Railway Protection Force- 2011, pursuant to the advertisement published in the Employment News vide Employment Notice No.01/2011. The petitioner had appeared in the Written ...
Ifci Factors Ltd. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. Nos.4434/2014, 4435/2014, 4436/2014, 4437/2014, 4438/2014 IFCI FACTORS LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.S. Vinaik & Mr. Deepak Bastha, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prashant Manchanda, Advocate for R-2 & R-3. Mr. Promod Kumar Saxena, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By these petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the petitioner assails orders dated 20.08.2014 passed by learned Civil Judge (South East), Saket Courts, New Delhi and order dated 23.08.2014 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate-01 (NI Act)/ South West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (in Crl. M.C. No.4438/2014) whereby the complaint(s) have been returned to the petitioner/ complainant for filing the same in the Court(s) having territorial juris...
Himanshu Seth Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5701/2014 HIMANSHU SETH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.P. Luthra, Mr. Sowrabh Luthra & Mr. Shivansh Singh, Advocates versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State with SI Rajpal, PS Jamia Nagar Mr. Jatin Gulati, A.R. of the R-2 Co. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 16.12.2014 CRL.M.A. 19473/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5701/2014 1. This petition has been moved seeking quashing of FIR No.914/2014 registered under Sections 408/420 IPC at Police Station Jamia Nagar on 10.10.2014 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. Shri Deepak Jain, Chief Financial Officer of the complainant company/respondent No.2 herein, is also present. He has handed over the original authority letter dated 12.1...
M/S. Goyal Mg Gases Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h November, 2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. Nos.4407/2014, 4534/2014, 4535/2014, 4536/2014, 4537/2014, 4538/2014, 4539/2014, 4540/2014, 4541/2014, 4542/2014, 4543/2014, 4544/2014, 4545/2014, 4546/2014, 4547/2014, 4548/2014, 4549/2014, 4550/2014, 4564/2014, 4565/2014, 4567/2014, 4568/2014, 4731/2014, 4556/2014, 4557/2014, 4558/2014, 4559/2014, 4560/2014, 4561/2014, 4562/2014, 4563/2014, 4553/2014, 4554/2014, 4555/2014, 4552/2014, 4551/2014 & 4566/2014 M/S. GOYAL MG GASES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey with Mr. Shiv Chopra and Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Vijay Aggarwal with Ms. Chaitali Jain and Ms. Katyayini, Advocates. Mr. M. P. Singh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By these petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter after referred to as Cr.P.C....
Shaily Goel and Anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4860/2014 SHAILY GOEL & ANR Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Atul Guleria and Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocates with petitioner. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms.Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Inspector Raman Lamba, P.S. Mahrauli. Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate with Mr. Jatin Gulati, A.R. of R2/complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.740/2014 registered under Section 66(B) of the Information Technology Act on 16.05.2014, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate for respondent No.2 / complainant, enter appearance and accept notice. Sh. Jatin Gulati, Chief Finance Officer of the complainant company, who is also the authorized Representative, is present ...
Hardayal Singh Mehta Vs. Shri Joginder Singh Mehta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EFA (OS) No.28/2014 Date of Decision:16. h December, 2014 HARDAYAL SINGH MEHTA Through : ..... APPELLANT Mr.G.L. Rawal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kuljeet Rawal, Adv. Versus SHRI JOGINDER SINGH MEHTA ..... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Rajiv Tyagi, Adv. with Mr.Ram Mohan Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL GITA MITTAL, J (ORAL) CM No.19836/2014 1. For the reasons stated, delay of 56 days in filing the appeal is condoned. This application is allowed in the above terms. EFA (OS) No.28/2014 2. The instant appeal assails the order dated 26 th August, 2014 passed in Execution Petition No.305/2008 entitled Shri Joginder Singh Vs Shri Hardayal Singh Mehta & Ors. whereby the learned Single Judge has directed issuance of warrants of possession vis-a-vis House No.7306- 7307, Prem Nagar, Subzi Mandi, Delhi against the appellant in terms of the Arbitral Award dated 5th April, 1972 which was made rule of the co...
M/S Rpp Infra Projects Ltd Vs. M/S Ntpc Tamil Nadu Energy and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 924/2014 & I.A.No.16356/2014 + Judgment reserved on:11. 11.2014 Judgment pronounced on:16. 12.2014 M/S RPP INFRA PROJECTS LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Govind Manoharan, Advocate. versus M/S NTPC TAMIL NADU ENERGY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Bharat Sangal with Ms.Anusuya Choudhury, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms.Padma Priya, Advocate for respondent No.2/Indian Overseas Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer that the respondent no.1 be restrained from invoking and encashing the bank guarantee and respondent no.2 from making payment to respondent no.1 in respect of bank guarantees.2. The admitted facts of the case are that the petitioner was awarded the township work in the vicinity of power plant on a turnkey basis with residential and non-residential buildings and other services vide LPA No.NTECL/C&...
R. Muthuswamy Vs. The Management of M/S Bhor Industries Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h December, 2014. % + W.P.(C) No.8886/2004 R. MUTHUSWAMY Through: .. Petitioner Mr. V. Sudeer & Mr. Alvin Abraham, Advs. Versus THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S BHOR INDUSTRIES LTD. .. Respondent Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the Award dated 26th May, 2003 of the Labour Court-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No.684/1997 on the following reference:Whether the action of the management in discharging Sh. R. Muthuswamy from service is illegal and / or unjustified and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect. and answering against the petitioner / workman only on the ground of the Labour Court at Delhi having no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the reference for the reason that the petitioner / workman was working with the respondent at its office at Pune, Maharashtra when his services w...
Ms. Babita Kadian Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8366/2014 MS. BABITA KADIAN Through ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajan Sabharwal & Mr. Raghav Sabharwal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER1612.2014 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus to the respondents for considering her candidature for appointment to the post of Constable (RPF) 2011, against the OBC category alongwith all the consequential benefits accruing therefrom. In brief, the facts of the case are that the petitioner belongs to the OBC category. She had applied for the post of Constable (Female)/RPF against OBC category in Railway Protection Force- 2011, pursuant to the advertisement published in the Employment News vide Employment Notice No.01/2011. The petitioner had appeared in the Written ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »