Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Adesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 3543/2014 ADESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Pramod Singh. For the Respondents : Ms Suparna Srivastava, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns an order dated 16.04.2014 passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter CIC) rejecting the petitioners appeal against an order dated 14.11.2012 passed by the First Appellate Authority (hereafter FAA). The FAA had, by an order dated 14.11.2012, rejected the appeal filed by the petitioner against the decision of the CPIO denying the information as sought by the petitioner under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act).2. The CPIO had denied the information as sought for by the petitioner claiming that the same was exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(h) of...
Bal Kishan Vs. Department of Pfa Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1070 of 2008 BAL KISHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri with Mr. Ajay Pal Singh and Mr. Prannoy Dey, Advocates. versus DEPARTMENT OF PFA GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1612.2014 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 17th November 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in CC No.101 of 1998 holding the Appellant guilty of the offence under Section 7 punishable under Section 16 (1A) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act) and the order on sentence dated 19th November 2008, sentencing him to two years rigorous imprisonment (RI) with a fine of Rs,5000 and in default to undergo RI for five months.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 21st August 1998 at around 1.45 pm, Food Inspector (FI) D.V Singh (PW-2) along with FI R.P Singh (PW-5) purchased a sample of mustard oil from t...
Avtec Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 1874/2014 and CM No.3915/2014 AVTEC LIMITED ... Petitioner versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Salil Kapoor, Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Varun Gupta For the Respondent : Mr Balbir Singh and Mr Abhishek Singh Baghel CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the notice dated 28.03.2013 issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) whereby the petitioners assessment for the assessment year 2006-07 is sought to be re-opened. The petition is also directed against the order dated 14.03.2014 whereby the Assessing Officer has rejected the objections raised by the petitioner pursuant to the issuance of the impugned notice dated 28.03.2013.2. The original assessment under Section 143(...
R. Muthuswamy Vs. The Management of M/S Bhor Industries Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:16. h December, 2014. % + W.P.(C) No.8886/2004 R. MUTHUSWAMY Through: .. Petitioner Mr. V. Sudeer & Mr. Alvin Abraham, Advs. Versus THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S BHOR INDUSTRIES LTD. .. Respondent Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India impugns the Award dated 26th May, 2003 of the Labour Court-II, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in I.D. No.684/1997 on the following reference:Whether the action of the management in discharging Sh. R. Muthuswamy from service is illegal and / or unjustified and if so, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect. and answering against the petitioner / workman only on the ground of the Labour Court at Delhi having no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the reference for the reason that the petitioner / workman was working with the respondent at its office at Pune, Maharashtra when his services w...
Himanshu Seth Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5701/2014 HIMANSHU SETH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. R.P. Luthra, Mr. Sowrabh Luthra & Mr. Shivansh Singh, Advocates versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State with SI Rajpal, PS Jamia Nagar Mr. Jatin Gulati, A.R. of the R-2 Co. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 16.12.2014 CRL.M.A. 19473/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5701/2014 1. This petition has been moved seeking quashing of FIR No.914/2014 registered under Sections 408/420 IPC at Police Station Jamia Nagar on 10.10.2014 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. Shri Deepak Jain, Chief Financial Officer of the complainant company/respondent No.2 herein, is also present. He has handed over the original authority letter dated 12.1...
Prakash Dhingra Vs. State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4787/2014 PRAKASH DHINGRA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. S.P. Kaushik, Advocate with petitioner. versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. W/SI Alma Minj, P.S. Sarai Rohilla. Mr. Rajiv Hooda, Advocate with R2 complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.293/2013 under Section 498-A, 406, 34 IPC at police station Sarai Rohilla, on 09.07.2013, on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mr. Rajiv Hooda, Advocate for respondent No.2, enter appearance and accept notice. Respondent No.2, who is present in person, is also identified by the Investigating Officer, W/Sub Inspector Alma Minj.4. The aforesaid FIR is stated to have been lodged by respo...
Ram Sajiwan Saroj Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO22012 Decided on 16th December, 2014 RAM SAJIWAN SAROJ Through ..... Appellant Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA Through ..... Respondent Mr. Rajeshwar Singh and Mr. Deepak Sagar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Claim application filed by the appellant seeking compensation of `10 lacs under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (the Act, for short), has been dismissed by the Railway Claim Tribunal, vide order dated 16.08.2011. Aggrieved by this order the appellant has preferred this appeal.2. Appellant alleged in the claim application that he boarded Gorakhdham Express at Shakurbasti Railway Station for going to Amethi in Uttar Pradesh on 15.09.2009 after purchasing a valid ticket. Due to the sudden jerk of the train, he fell down from train at the platform itself and his left leg was amputated at Bhagwan Mahavir Hospital where he was taken for treatment after the incident.3. Responden...
Shri Ombir Vs. The State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3707/2014 SHRI OMBIR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naresh C. Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with ASI Tej Ram PS Najafgarh. Complainant in person with Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 3707/2014 and Crl. M.A. 12798/2014 (for stay) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.157/2012 registered under Sections 452/506/323/34 IPC at Police Station Najafgarh on 13th May, 2012 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of State/respondent No.1 and respondent No.2, respectively.3. Petitioner as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Sajjan Kumar are pres...
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 16, 2014 + W.P.(C) 4309/2013 & CM. No.10006/2013 MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms. Aparna Bhat, Advocate for Respondents No.2 to 6. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.W.P.(C) 4309/2013 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside the show-cause notice dated 30.11.2012 issued by the respondent No.4/Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Exemption), orders dated 11.01.2013 and 28.02.2013 passed by the respondent No.4/Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I (North) and the showcause notice dated 07.05.2013 issued by the respondent No.6./Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Compliance-II).2. Further seeks declaration that Condition No.25 of Appendix A of Para 27AA of the Employees Prov...
Satpal Vs. State and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :10.12.2014 Judgment delivered on :16.12.2014 CRL.REV.P. 882/2002 SATPAL Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Sunil K.Mittal, Mr.Harsh Khanna and Mr.Anshul Mittal, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. Mr.Vijay Aggarwal, Ms.Chaitali Jain and Ms.Katyayini, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This revision petition is directed against the order dated 11.7.2002 passed by the High Court wherein the Sessions Judge on a remand by the High Court (in terms of the order of the High Court dated 08.10.2001) had, on the ground of maintainability, dismissed the petition. 2 Record shows that two cross FIRs had been registered qua the same incident of 27.10.1988, at police station Keshav Puram. In FIR No.182/1988, the complainant was Pritam Dass (respondent no.2 in the present case). In the second FIR which is FIR No.2/1989, the complainant was Satpa...
- ‹ Prev
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- Next ›
- Last »