Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kulvir Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 4574/2014 KULVIR SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 5480/2014 INDERDEEP CHUMBER ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7109/2014 & CM166652014 BHUPINDER SINGH NIJJAR ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Gupta in W.P.(C) 4574 & 5480/2014. Mr Varun Mathur and Mr Lalit in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. For the Respondents : Mr Hashmat Nabi in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Kritika Mehra and Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr S. S. Rai and Mr Rohan Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn separate orders denying passports to the respective petitioners for the reason that the petitioners had applied for political asylum, while the...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. M/S. N.R.B.Associates and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :24. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :17. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1672/2007 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Aakash Yadav, Advocate for Ms.Beenashaw N.Soni, Advocate. VERSUS M/S. N.R.B.ASSOCIATES AND ORS. Through : ..... Defendants None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Delhi Development Authority has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 32,62,401.90/- along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.2. As per the averments in the plaint, tenders were invited for development of 1769.88 hectares of land and construction of peripheral storm water drain in Sector 1 & 2, Pappankalan (Dwarka). The aforesaid work was awarded to the defendants vide letter dated 28.09.1996 at an estimated cost of ` 1,45,28,550/- and tendered amount of ` 1,46,60,760/-. The date of commencement of work was stipulated as 08.10.1996 and that of completion as 07.10.1997....
M/S Rpp Infra Projects Ltd Vs. M/S Ntpc Tamil Nadu Energy and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 924/2014 & I.A.No.16356/2014 + Judgment reserved on:11. 11.2014 Judgment pronounced on:16. 12.2014 M/S RPP INFRA PROJECTS LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate with Mr.Govind Manoharan, Advocate. versus M/S NTPC TAMIL NADU ENERGY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Bharat Sangal with Ms.Anusuya Choudhury, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms.Padma Priya, Advocate for respondent No.2/Indian Overseas Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer that the respondent no.1 be restrained from invoking and encashing the bank guarantee and respondent no.2 from making payment to respondent no.1 in respect of bank guarantees.2. The admitted facts of the case are that the petitioner was awarded the township work in the vicinity of power plant on a turnkey basis with residential and non-residential buildings and other services vide LPA No.NTECL/C&...
Anil Gambhir Vs. Cpwd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6341/2013 & CM No.13848/2013 ANIL GAMBHIR ..... Petitioner versus CPWD AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6342/2013 & CM No.13849/2013 SL BUILDERS ..... Petitioner versus CPWD AND ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Anand Mishra. For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Saqib, Adv. for R-2 (in W.P.(C) 6341/2013). CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn an Office Memorandum No.DGW/MAN/ 202 dated 15.12.2009 issued by respondent No.1 (hereafter CPWD), whereby outsourcing of day to day maintenance, annual repair and maintenance and special repair etc. pertaining to civil, electrical & horticulture service was declared as a specialised work/item (hereafter referred to as the impugned memorandum).2. The petitioners contend that the impugned memorandum is arbitrary, unreasonable and violates Article...
Micromax Informatics Ltd Vs. Shenzhen Oneplus Technology Co Ltd and Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Sl Builders Vs. Cpwd and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6341/2013 & CM No.13848/2013 ANIL GAMBHIR ..... Petitioner versus CPWD AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 6342/2013 & CM No.13849/2013 SL BUILDERS ..... Petitioner versus CPWD AND ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Anand Mishra. For the Respondents : Mr Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Saqib, Adv. for R-2 (in W.P.(C) 6341/2013). CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn an Office Memorandum No.DGW/MAN/ 202 dated 15.12.2009 issued by respondent No.1 (hereafter CPWD), whereby outsourcing of day to day maintenance, annual repair and maintenance and special repair etc. pertaining to civil, electrical & horticulture service was declared as a specialised work/item (hereafter referred to as the impugned memorandum).2. The petitioners contend that the impugned memorandum is arbitrary, unreasonable and violates Article...
Nepal Airlines Corporation Vs. Girish Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :16. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1402/2010 NEPAL AIRLINES CORPORATION Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ramashankar, Advocate with Mr.Shivam Garg, Advocate. versus GIRISH KUMAR SINGH Through : ..... Defendant. None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Nepal Airlines Corporation formerly known as Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 80,18,000/- with interest pendente-lite and future.2. As per averments in the plaint, the plaintiff carries on its business in India having its principal office at 44, Janpath, New Delhi. The defendant established an enterprise known as Nepal Travel Information Centre, based in Bombay. Subsequently, offices were established in other cities including Delhi at 13/29, East Patel Nagar, New Delhi. The plaintiff is an international airline carrying on its business operations in India. In December, 1995, the d...
Rakesh Kumar Arora Vs. Department of Pfa Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.1069 of 2008 RAKESH KUMAR ARORA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Saket Sikri with Mr. Ajay Pal Singh and Mr. Prannoy Dey, Advocates. versus DEPARTMENT OF PFA GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP for the State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1612.2014 1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 17th November 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in CC No.66 of 1998 holding the Appellant guilty of the offence under Section 7 punishable under Section 16 (1A) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act) and the order on sentence dated 19th November 2008, sentencing him to two years rigorous imprisonment (RI) with a fine of Rs,5000 and in default to undergo RI for five months.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 6th August 1998 at around 4 pm, Food Inspector (FI) Anil Kumar Dhir (PW-2) purchased a sample of mustard oil from the Appellant from his ...
Anil Kumar Bana Vs. Chairman/Md, Food Corporation of India (Hq) and Or
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 532/2014 Reserved on :20. 11.2014 Pronounced on :16. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: ANIL KUMAR BANA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagat Singh, Advocate with Ms. E.J.Ahuja, Advocate versus CHAIRMAN/MD, FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA (HQ) AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajit Pudussery, Advocate with Ms. Shruti Sarma Hazarika, Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh and Mr. O.P. Singh, Advocates CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying inter alia for quashing the order dated 15.09.2011, whereunder his request for appointment on compassionate grounds upon the demise of his father, Shri Rajpal Singh was turned down by the respondents/FCI.2. A perusal of the impugned order dated 15.09.2011 reveals that the petitioners candidature for a category IV post in the year 2005 was examined on merits by the Zonal Empowered Committee and was rejected on the ground that there was no vacancy within the ceili...
Raghu Nandan Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2014
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 16, 2014 + CRL.A. 1267/2013 RAGHU NANDAN Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Siddhant Srivastava, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp.Tarkeshwar Singh, SHO PS Nand Nagri with SI Somil Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant, to be fair to him, has nothing much to argue in the instant appeal, which lays a challenge to the decision dated August 01, 2013 passed by the learned Trial Judge convicting the appellant for having murdered his wife and for injuring his daughter Naina with the knife used by him to cause the fatal life threatening injuries to his wife. Vide order on sentence dated August 03, 2013, for the offence of murder, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with a direction that the case of the appellant for...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »