Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Aditya Promoters Ltd. Vs. Shri S.Karthikeyan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:2. d December, 2014 Date of Decision:17. h December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. No.4666/2014 M/S ADITYA PROMOTERS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Advocate. versus SHRI S. KARTHIKEYAN Through: .....Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The petitioner by filing the present petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), has assailed order dated 30.08.2014 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate-(NI Act)-Central -01, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the complaint has been returned to the petitioner/complainant for filing the same in the Court having territorial jurisdiction.2. In a nut shell, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant is a limited company duly incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 4428, Ganesh Bazar, Cloth Market, Delhi 110006 and was engaged in manufa...
M/S National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S Ncc-Vee (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 472/2013 Judgement reserved on:24. 09.2014 Judgment pronounced on:17. 12.2014. % M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tanu Priya Gupta and Mr.Mukesh Verma, Advocates. versus M/S BSCPL Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Amit George and Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha , Advocates. And + O.M.P. 305/2013 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA.. Petitioner Through: Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Adv with Ms Tanu Priya Gupta and Mr Mukesh Verma, Advs. versus M/S NCC-VEE (JV) ..... Respondent Through: Mr Krishna Vijay Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 This order shall dispose of the above said two OMPs. Both the cases are taken up together as in both of them, the challenge relates to the interpretation of sub-clause 70.3 (xi) of COPA although in both the cases parties had entered into independent agreements, but the sub-clause 70.3 and other relevant clauses ...
Jawahar Singh Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 11, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 585/2014 JAWAHAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.P.Luthra, Mr.Shivansh and Mr.Sourabh, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR Represented by: + ..... Respondents Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SHO Vijay Shrotriya, Inspector S.P.Singh, PS Karawal Nagar Mr.Krishan Kumar and Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocates for R-2. CRL.A. 1611/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. versus RAVI SHARMA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Krishan Kumar and Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the impugned judgment dated March 22, 2014 Ravi Sharma, has been acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act which is challenged by both State after having sought leave to appeal and Jawahar Singh, the father of the deceased Rajesh. The r...
Jai Ram @ Vicky Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 121/2014 JAI RAM @ VICKY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Shahid Azad, Ms.Sonali Karwasra and Mr.Gaurav Bhatt, Advs. versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jai Ram @ Vicky has been convicted along with R for the murder of Ishwanti mother of R and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.2. Learned counsel for Jai Ram challenging the circumstances held against Jai Ram by the learned Trial Court contends that the prosecution has led no evidence to show that Jai Ram and R were in love with each other. It is also not proved that the mobile phone allegedly recovered from Jai Ram belonged to the deceased. The evide...
Vijender Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
$~ R-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :11. 12.2014 Judgment delivered on :17. 12.2014 % + CRL.A. 439/2006 VIJENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. C.L. Gupta with Mr. Akashdeep Verma & Mr. Rahul Ahlawat, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP. SI Mousam Ghani, P.S. Mayur Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 19.05.2006 and 26.05.2006 respectively, wherein the appellant had been convicted under Section 3(1)(X) and Section 3(2)(VII) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). He had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for a period of 15 days for the offence under Section 3(2)(VII) of the Act; no separate sentence had been imposed f...
Bhupinder Singh Nijjar Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 4574/2014 KULVIR SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 5480/2014 INDERDEEP CHUMBER ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7109/2014 & CM166652014 BHUPINDER SINGH NIJJAR ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Gupta in W.P.(C) 4574 & 5480/2014. Mr Varun Mathur and Mr Lalit in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. For the Respondents : Mr Hashmat Nabi in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Kritika Mehra and Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr S. S. Rai and Mr Rohan Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn separate orders denying passports to the respective petitioners for the reason that the petitioners had applied for political asylum, while the...
Prahlad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :08. 12.2014 Pronounced on :17.12.2014 % + CRL.A. 1285/2011 PRAHLAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Avninder Singh, Advocate. (DHCLSC) versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State with SI Manohar Lal, PS Rajouri Garden. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by the Appellant Prahlad against the judgment and order on sentence dated 4.5.2011 passed by learned Addl. Session Judge in Session Case No.186/2008 whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 376 (2)(f) IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for one year.2. Briefly stating, the case FIR No.138/2008 under Section 376/511 IPC was registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden against the Appellant on the basis of statement Ex.PW7/A made by the Complainant Dalsukh, father of ch...
M/S National Highways Authority of India Vs. M/S Bscpl
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 472/2013 Judgement reserved on:24. 09.2014 Judgment pronounced on:17. 12.2014. % M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Tanu Priya Gupta and Mr.Mukesh Verma, Advocates. versus M/S BSCPL Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Amit George and Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha , Advocates. And + O.M.P. 305/2013 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA.. Petitioner Through: Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Adv with Ms Tanu Priya Gupta and Mr Mukesh Verma, Advs. versus M/S NCC-VEE (JV) ..... Respondent Through: Mr Krishna Vijay Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT1 This order shall dispose of the above said two OMPs. Both the cases are taken up together as in both of them, the challenge relates to the interpretation of sub-clause 70.3 (xi) of COPA although in both the cases parties had entered into independent agreements, but the sub-clause 70.3 and other relevant clauses ...
Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd Vs. Asstt. Director, Enforcement of Director ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 848/2010 Reserved on:15. h December, 2014 Decided on:17. h December, 2014 % RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.L.Rawal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Rawal, Jagjit Singh and, Mr.Saurabh, Advocates. versus ASSTT. DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT OF DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Advocate for ED. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The present petition is directed against the order dated 11th November, 2009 whereby the review petition filed by the Petitioner herein was dismissed.2. The backdrop of the facts being that an Import License was issued for import of Tin Plates to the Petitioner, which was imported and foreign exchange so allocated was utilized on establishing Letter of Credit in favour of the foreign suppliers and imported 94.025 MTs of Tin Plates from Brazil. The imported goods were cleared from the Customs on or about 25 th March, 1995 on payment of duty. The documents of import were ...
Good Luck Traders Vs. State and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:17. hDecember, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. Nos.4106/2014, 4107/2014 & 4108/2014 GOOD LUCK TRADERS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Pratap Singh, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Mr. Kuljeet Rawal, Adv. for R-2 to 6 Mr. Vinod Diwakar, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 There are three petitions filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), assailing order dated 23.08.2014 passed by learned Municipal Magistrate-01, Karkardooma Courts, East, Delhi whereby the complaint(s) have been returned to the petitioner/ complainant for filing the same in the Court(s) having territorial jurisdiction.2. Since all the petitions involve an identical question of law, therefore, all the petitions are being disposed of by this common order.3. Succinctly stating, the facts of the case are tha...
- ‹ Prev
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Next ›
- Last »