Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jeet Singh @ Jeetu and Anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 810/2014 JEET SINGH @ JEETU & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Kaushal Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Tarkeshwar Singh, SHO Nand Nagri. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jeet Singh @ Jeetu and Kalu @ Neeraj both sons of Chattarsen have been convicted for the offence of murder of Deewan, on the strength of testimony of Chet Ram PW-6 the brother of the deceased vide the impugned judgment dated April 29, 2014 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- each vide order dated May 07, 2014.2. Learned counsel for the appellants contends that the presence of Chet Ram at the spot when the incident took place has not been proved as PW-4 Raghunath who informed the police does not depo...
State Vs. Ravi Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 11, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 585/2014 JAWAHAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.P.Luthra, Mr.Shivansh and Mr.Sourabh, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR Represented by: + ..... Respondents Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SHO Vijay Shrotriya, Inspector S.P.Singh, PS Karawal Nagar Mr.Krishan Kumar and Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocates for R-2. CRL.A. 1611/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. versus RAVI SHARMA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Krishan Kumar and Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the impugned judgment dated March 22, 2014 Ravi Sharma, has been acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act which is challenged by both State after having sought leave to appeal and Jawahar Singh, the father of the deceased Rajesh. The r...
Jawahar Singh Vs. State and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 11, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 585/2014 JAWAHAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.P.Luthra, Mr.Shivansh and Mr.Sourabh, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR Represented by: + ..... Respondents Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP with SHO Vijay Shrotriya, Inspector S.P.Singh, PS Karawal Nagar Mr.Krishan Kumar and Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocates for R-2. CRL.A. 1611/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. versus RAVI SHARMA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Krishan Kumar and Ms.Sunita Arora, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the impugned judgment dated March 22, 2014 Ravi Sharma, has been acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and Sections 25/27 Arms Act which is challenged by both State after having sought leave to appeal and Jawahar Singh, the father of the deceased Rajesh. The r...
Jai Ram @ Vicky Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: December 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 121/2014 JAI RAM @ VICKY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Shahid Azad, Ms.Sonali Karwasra and Mr.Gaurav Bhatt, Advs. versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Jai Ram @ Vicky has been convicted along with R for the murder of Ishwanti mother of R and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `10,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.2. Learned counsel for Jai Ram challenging the circumstances held against Jai Ram by the learned Trial Court contends that the prosecution has led no evidence to show that Jai Ram and R were in love with each other. It is also not proved that the mobile phone allegedly recovered from Jai Ram belonged to the deceased. The evide...
Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd Vs. Asstt. Director, Enforcement of Director ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 848/2010 Reserved on:15. h December, 2014 Decided on:17. h December, 2014 % RUCHI SOYA INDUSTRIES LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. G.L.Rawal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Rawal, Jagjit Singh and, Mr.Saurabh, Advocates. versus ASSTT. DIRECTOR, ENFORCEMENT OF DIRECTORATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Advocate for ED. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The present petition is directed against the order dated 11th November, 2009 whereby the review petition filed by the Petitioner herein was dismissed.2. The backdrop of the facts being that an Import License was issued for import of Tin Plates to the Petitioner, which was imported and foreign exchange so allocated was utilized on establishing Letter of Credit in favour of the foreign suppliers and imported 94.025 MTs of Tin Plates from Brazil. The imported goods were cleared from the Customs on or about 25 th March, 1995 on payment of duty. The documents of import were ...
Bhupinder Singh Nijjar Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 4574/2014 KULVIR SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 5480/2014 INDERDEEP CHUMBER ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7109/2014 & CM166652014 BHUPINDER SINGH NIJJAR ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Gupta in W.P.(C) 4574 & 5480/2014. Mr Varun Mathur and Mr Lalit in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. For the Respondents : Mr Hashmat Nabi in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Kritika Mehra and Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr S. S. Rai and Mr Rohan Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn separate orders denying passports to the respective petitioners for the reason that the petitioners had applied for political asylum, while the...
Inderdeep Chumber Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 4574/2014 KULVIR SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 5480/2014 INDERDEEP CHUMBER ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7109/2014 & CM166652014 BHUPINDER SINGH NIJJAR ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Gupta in W.P.(C) 4574 & 5480/2014. Mr Varun Mathur and Mr Lalit in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. For the Respondents : Mr Hashmat Nabi in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Kritika Mehra and Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr S. S. Rai and Mr Rohan Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn separate orders denying passports to the respective petitioners for the reason that the petitioners had applied for political asylum, while the...
Kulvir Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 4574/2014 KULVIR SINGH ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 5480/2014 INDERDEEP CHUMBER ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents AND + W.P.(C) 7109/2014 & CM166652014 BHUPINDER SINGH NIJJAR ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajiv Gupta in W.P.(C) 4574 & 5480/2014. Mr Varun Mathur and Mr Lalit in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. For the Respondents : Mr Hashmat Nabi in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Kritika Mehra and Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI in W.P.(C) 4574/2014. Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr S. S. Rai and Mr Rohan Gupta for UOI in W.P.(C) 7109/2014. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioners impugn separate orders denying passports to the respective petitioners for the reason that the petitioners had applied for political asylum, while the...
Prahlad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :08. 12.2014 Pronounced on :17.12.2014 % + CRL.A. 1285/2011 PRAHLAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Avninder Singh, Advocate. (DHCLSC) versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State with SI Manohar Lal, PS Rajouri Garden. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by the Appellant Prahlad against the judgment and order on sentence dated 4.5.2011 passed by learned Addl. Session Judge in Session Case No.186/2008 whereby he has been convicted for committing the offence punishable under Section 376 (2)(f) IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for one year.2. Briefly stating, the case FIR No.138/2008 under Section 376/511 IPC was registered at Police Station Rajouri Garden against the Appellant on the basis of statement Ex.PW7/A made by the Complainant Dalsukh, father of ch...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. M/S. N.R.B.Associates and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :24. h NOVEMBER, 2014 DECIDED ON :17. h DECEMBER, 2014 + CS (OS) 1672/2007 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Aakash Yadav, Advocate for Ms.Beenashaw N.Soni, Advocate. VERSUS M/S. N.R.B.ASSOCIATES AND ORS. Through : ..... Defendants None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The plaintiff Delhi Development Authority has instituted the instant suit for recovery of ` 32,62,401.90/- along with interest @ 18% per annum from the date of institution of the suit.2. As per the averments in the plaint, tenders were invited for development of 1769.88 hectares of land and construction of peripheral storm water drain in Sector 1 & 2, Pappankalan (Dwarka). The aforesaid work was awarded to the defendants vide letter dated 28.09.1996 at an estimated cost of ` 1,45,28,550/- and tendered amount of ` 1,46,60,760/-. The date of commencement of work was stipulated as 08.10.1996 and that of completion as 07.10.1997....
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »