Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Moroccanoil Israel Limited Vs. Manoj Khanna and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:19. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1332/2014, I.A. Nos.8683/2014, 12455/2014 & 21713/2014 MOROCCANOIL ISRAEL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Pravin Anand, Adv. with Mr.Aditya Gupta, Adv. versus MANOJ KHANNA & ORS Through ..... Defendants Mr.P.C.Sharma, Adv. for D-1 & 2. Mr.Rajeev Kumar, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, passing off, damages and rendition of accounts etc.2. Since 2007, the plaintiff has continuously used the trademarks MOROCCONOIL, M (MOROCCANOIL Vertical Design), and M (MOROCCANOIL Horizontal Design) in relation to oil hair treatment products worldwide, including India. Plaintiff and its affiliates have registered or sought numerous registrations of their trademarks MOROCCANOIL, M (MOROCCANOIL, Vertical Design), and M (MOROCCANOIL Horizontal Design) in more ...
M/S Satya Parkash and Bros Pvt Ltd Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:19. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1112/2014 M/S SATYA PARKASH & BROS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Mr.Arun Kumar Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Achal Gupta, Adv. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.D.K. Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a suit for recovery filed by the plaintiff against the defendants under Order XXXVII CPC for a sum of Rs.25,71,705/along with pendent lite and future interest.2. Brief facts of the case as stated in the plaint are that plaintiff, a private limited company, is registered with several Government Organisations as Class-I Contractors and deals with C.P.W.D, STATE P.W.Ds., N.H.A.I., M.C.D., NDMC etc. mainly in road works.3. It is stated that defendants had invited tenders for the work of "Development and Strengthening of road by providing Dense Carpeting from H.No.15/10 to 17/1 in Indira Vikas colony in C-II/CLZ" which ...
Residents Welfare Association Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8053/2012 & CM No.20086/2012 RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Anshum Jain. For the Respondents : Mr Vijay Chandra and Ms Sonia Sharma for R-1 & R-3. Mr Manika Tripathy Pandey with Mr Ashutosh Kaushik for DDA. Mr S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Advocate with Mr Abhimanyu Garg, Mr Param Mishra and Ms Puja Dewan for R-4/DTDC. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner is a Residents Welfare Association of residents of C, G and DDA Flats East of Kailash, New Delhi and has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying for a direction to be issued for closure of a liquor shop operating in Convenient Shopping Centre at C Block Market, East of Kailash, New Delhi.2. According, to the petitioners, a liquor vend operating at a Convenient Shopping Centre (hereinaf...
Sanjay Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.577 of 2010 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma and Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1812.2014 1. The present appeal is by Sanjay, Accused No.1, the husband of the deceased Rekha, against the judgment dated 21st April 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in SC No.129 of 2009 convicting him for the offences under Section 304B IPC and Section 498A IPC and the order on sentence dated 26th April 2010 whereby he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 10 years for the offence under Section 304B IPC and simple imprisonment (SI) for 1 year along-with fine of Rs.3,000 and in default to undergo SI for 3 months for the offence under Section 498A IPC.2. It must be noted at the outset that as per the nominal roll dated 9th October 2014, the Appellant has already served 4 years 7 month...
Pk Agrawal Vs. Ndmc
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
12 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4544/2010 PK AGRAWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person with Ms. Mercy Hussain, Advocate. versus NDMC ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, Advocate with Ms. Sidhi Arora and Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, Advocates. Date of Decision :18. h December, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to grant vacancy remission under Section 110 of the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 (for short Act, 1994) for the period Flat No.817A, Amba Deep, 14 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110 001 measuring 292 sq. ft. of super area remained vacant.2. Petitioner, who appears in person, submits that the only requirement for grant of remission is that the property should have remained vacant and unproductive of rent for more than sixty days.3. He contends that in the present case the vacancy remission has been denied only on the ...
M/S Sumanta Sushanta Overseas Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Adlakha and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :21. 11.2014 DECIDED ON :18. 12.2014 + CS(OS) 452/2006 and IA Nos.3062/06,11218/06, 12249-50/06, 10763/07, 2735/08 M/S SUMANTA SUSHANTA OVERSEAS PVT.LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Amit Bansal, Advocate. VERSUS SANJAY ADLAKHA & ORS. Through : ..... Defendants. Mr.Atul Nigam with Mr.Amit Tiwari, Advocates. Mr.Gyanesh Bhardwaj proxy counsel for L&DO (UOI) Ms.Sakshi Popli, Advocate, for NDMC. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.IA No.18952/2013 (u/O6R17CPC) 1. The plaintiff has instituted the instant suit for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from interfering with its ownership and possession with regard to the suit property shown in red colour in the site plan filed as Annexure A. It is averred that by a registered Agreement to Sell dated 28.09.2004, the suit property bearing No.16-A, IA No.18952/2013 in CS (OS) No.452/2006 1 of 10 Regal Building, Cannought Place, New Delhi-110001, was purchased from Shikha ...
Jarafat Ahmad @ Shakil Ahmad Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~R-74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 18, 2014 + CRL.A.691/2011 JARAFAT AHMAD @ SHAKIL AHMAD ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The officer on duty at the police control room recorded information in the PCR record at 15:33:18 hours on April 15, 2010, that through mobile phone number 9250661120 an informant (whose name is not legible) informed that at premises RZ-25A, Indira Park, Palam a man had been stabbed : EK ADMI KO CHAKU MAAR DIYA HAI. It also records that after the said information was flashed over the wireless, the police patrol van 2BR-20 relayed the information at 16:53:08 hours that a husband had stabbed his wife. The lady was Rehmat Jahan wife of Sakeel. Said information recorded in the PCR form has been proved at the trial as Ex.PW-2/A. One...
Sh. Om Prakash and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.616/2008 & CM No.7332/2008 (stay) 18th December, 2014 % SH. OM PRAKASH & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. K.G.Chhokar, Adv. VERSUS UOI & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents Mr. S.P.Sharma with Dr. Ashwani Bharadwaj, Adv. for R-2. Mr. Gajendra Giri, Adv. for R-3. Mr. J.K.Jain, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the interested persons (I.Ps) in the proceedings which are pending before the Land Acquisition Court under Sections 30-31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short the Act), impugning the order of the LAC court dated 16.2.2008 by which the LAC court has allowed two applications under Order XXII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) filed by respondents no.3 and 4 herein namely M/s Jacks Aviation Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Man Sarovar Irrigation Pvt. Ltd. for the...
Naresh Kumar and Ors Vs. M/S Lancer Convent Senior Secondary School
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:18. h December,2014 % + W.P. (C) No.1254/2014 NARESH KUMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr.Arun K.Yadav, Adv. Versus M/S LANCER CONVENT SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. S.N.Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, petitioners seek setting aside the relief part of the award dated 13.01.2014, whereby the respondent / Management was directed to pay Rs.50,000/- each in favour of the petitioners as lump sum compensation in lieu of reinstatement and retrenchment compensation.2. The petitioners seek parity with other similar employees who settled their claims before this court and the respondent / Management paid them up to Rs.7,00,000/-. In one case, an employee namely Raj Bala, who was employed as Aya has received an amount of Rs.2,50,000/- towards arrears of back wages and later on settled the matter for Rs.4,50,000/-. Thus, the re...
Rajesh Dabas Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:18. h December, 2014 + W.P. (C) No.7461/2012 RAJESH DABAS ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya and Mr. Narinder Chaudhary, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ......Respondents Represented by: Mr.Rajat Arora, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the award dated 31.07.2012, whereby ld. Industrial Tribunal has dismissed his claim petition.2. The facts of the case are that Chairman, K.G. Denim Limited, Coimbatore came to meet Chairman and Managing Director of Punjab National Bank/R-2 on 13.11.2007. While going inside the cabin, said visitor kept his mobile phone outside. When he came out of the cabin, he found his mobile phone missing from the place where it was kept. Accordingly, he lodged a report of theft with the Bank Authority. Consequently, search of the said phone was conducted.3. The p...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »