Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 103 of about 1,089 results (0.017 seconds)Pradeep @ Kuldeep Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 17, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 01, 2014 % + CRL.A. 261/2014 PRADEEP @ KULDEEP Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate with Mr.Amit Kala, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Anil Sharma CRL.A. 116/2014 ROHIT Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Neeraj Bhardwaj, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Anil Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. On March 27, 2008 a joint written complaint Ex.PW-5/A was handed over by Ram Prasad PW-2, father of Rajan (hereinafter referred to as the deceased), Babloo @ Mirajuddin PW-5, the owner-cum-driver of an Innova motor vehicle bearing registration No.DL7X1951 and Hari Om Gupta PW-6, the proprietor of Himanshu Tours and Travels, informing the SHO of PS Mayur Vihar that Kuldeep and Pradeep, having mobi...
Tag this Judgment!Rajeev Sharma and Ors Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5464/2014 RAJEEV SHARMA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for the State with SI Ram Manohar, PS Keshav Puram. Mr. Gaurav Kaushik, Advocate for R2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Crl. M.A. 18645/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5464/2014 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.333/2011 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Keshav Puram on 30th October, 2011 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Mr. P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Gaurav Kaushik, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice ...
Tag this Judgment!Hardeep Singh Vs. Baldev Singh and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:04. 02.2014 Date of Decision:01. 12.2014 + CM (M) No.476 of 2013 And CM Nos.7181 of 2013 & 7182 of 2013 HARDEEP SINGH ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.R. Pamei, Adv. versus BALDEV SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mahesh Kumar Gautam, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.1. This petition impugns an order dated 21.12.2012 of the learned ADJ, Tis Hazari Courts in Suit No.434/2012 whereby the plaint was returned to the plaintiff/petitioner under Order VII, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) to be filed before the Court of appropriate jurisdiction. The Court was of the view that the valuation report of the suit property as on 10.9.2012 showed it to be of the value of Rs.40,73,500/-, which was more than its pecuniary jurisdiction where the suit was filed. In these circumstances, the plaint was returned.2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on t...
Tag this Judgment!Juggal K Sood Vs. Kamal K Sood
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 484/1998 JUGGAL K SOOD Through: ..... Plaintiff Ch. Shamsuddin Khan, Adv. versus KAMAL K SOOD Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Mr.Vijay Kasana, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL ORDER % 01.12.2014 IA No.7875/2014 IA No.7876/2014 IA No.7877/2014 IA No.7878/2014 1. (O.XXII Rule 9 CPC) in CS(OS) 484/1998; (delay) in CS(OS) 484/1998 ; (O.XXII Rule 4 CPC) in CS(OS) 484/1998 & (delay) in CS(OS) 484/1998 These applications are for substitution of the legal representatives (LRs) of the deceased Defendant no.1 and for setting aside the order of abatement as the application for substitution of LRs was not moved in time. Since the application for setting aside the abetment was also not moved in time, an application for condonation of delay in moving the application for setting aside of the abatement has also been moved.2. As per the averments made in IA No.7878/2014, there is a delay of 439 days in moving the...
Tag this Judgment!Kanhiya Lal Yadav Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 25, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 01, 2014 % + CRL. A. 1168/2010 KANHIYA LAL YADAV Represented by: .... Appellant Mr.Vibhakar Mishra, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Jaipal Singh, PS Mayur Vihar, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Kanhiya Lal is convicted for the murder of Miraz vide impugned judgment dated August 09, 2010 and directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of two months which he assails in the present appeal.2. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the prosecution has planted the witnesses to foist a false case against the appellant. The evidence of PW-4 Prashant Aggarwal, PW-16 Gurpreet Singh and PW-18 Inspector Surender Singh is contradi...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 7324/2014 & CM No.18650/2014 MUKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Petitioner in person. For the Respondents : Mrs Suparna Srivastava CGSC with Mr Nishtha Sikroria for R-1/UOI. Mr Rajiv Kapur and Mr Shrey Chattly for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner requires funds, urgently, to pay the initial costs for a dwelling unit as a member of a group housing society. And, although the petitioner has been saving for the past twenty two years, he has been denied access to his savings. This has led the petitioner to file the present petition. The petitioner impugns an order dated 15.10.2014 passed by Under Secretary, Ministry of Finance, rejecting his request to close his Public Provident Fund Account no.10819241976 maintained with State Bank of India (hereafter the PPF...
Tag this Judgment!Rajesh Agarwal Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
* s + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 3596/2014 Decided on :01. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: RAJESH AGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jawahar Raja, Advocate with Ms. Sahana Manjesh, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.S.R. Krishna, Advocate for R-1 and R-2/UOI. Ms. Maninder Acharya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dipak Bhattacharya and Mr. M.S.Mukherjee, Advocates for R-3. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner, who is presently working on the post of Principal Chief Engineer, Konkan Railways Corporation Ltd., Navi Mumbai, seeks quashing of the decision/order of the respondent No.1/Ministry and the respondent No.2/DOPT of declining to appoint him to the post of Director (Way and Works), Konkan Railways Corporation Ltd., and further, seeks directions to the respondent No.1/Ministry to appoint him to the subject post.2. The undisputed facts of the case are that on 28.05.2013, the...
Tag this Judgment!Manjeet Katariya Vs. Staff Selection Commission and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8406/2014 Decided on:01. 12.2014 IN THE MATTERS OF : MANJEET KATARIYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Advocate versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak Dewan, Advocate for R-4/FCI. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 10.06.2013 issued by the respondent No3/Regional Director (NR) of the respondent No.1/Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder he was informed that on failure to show cause, his candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.4/FCI , would be cancelled and he would be debarred for a period of five years from the Commissions examinations.2. With the consent of the parties...
Tag this Judgment!Veera SarIn and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 11.2014 Pronounced on:01. 12.2014. + W.P.(CRL) 1606/2008 VEERA SARIN & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Gaurav Kejriwal, Sh. Ajay Gulati and Sh. Sujit Kesari, Advocates. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Baldev Malik with Sh. Arjun Malik, Advocates, for UOI. Sh. Saleem Ahmed, Standing Counsel (Crl), for State with Ms. Charu Dalal and Sh. Ajay Pratap, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner in these proceedings seeks directions calling for the records relevant to the detention order dated 12.7.1975 made under the provisions of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities W.P.(CRL) 1606/2008 Act, 1974 (hereafter referred to as Page 1 COFEPOSA) as well as for quashing proceedings initiated and orders made under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (F...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd Kamil Vs. State and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3816/2014 MOHD KAMIL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Kuldeep Singh, PS Gazipur. Mr. Kapil Singhal, Advocate for the complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No.27/2012 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at Police Station Ghazipur on 23rd January, 2012 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor and Mr. Kapil Singhal, Advocate enter appearance and accept notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1 and respondent No.2/complainant, respectively.3. Petitioner as well as complainant/respondent No.2-Khurshida are present in person and are ...
Tag this Judgment!