Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Leena Udayawar and Anr. Vs. Kapil Tyagi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
$~R-16A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:02. 12.2014 + MAC APP.707/2006 LEENA UDAYAWAR AND ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Peeush Sharma, Advocate versus KAPIL TYAGI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is filed by the appellants/claimants seeking enhancement of compensation as granted by the award dated 08.06.2006. The facts which lead to the filing of the claim petition before the MACT are that the deceased Sunder Udyawar was going to Sadiq Nagar Market along with his sister-in-law. He was hit by a scooter driven at a high speed which collided with the deceased due to which he fell down and suffered head injuries. He remained in the ICU, in coma for 21 days and eventually passed away.2. The issue revolves around the compensation granted by the Tribunal. A total compensation of Rs. 5,37,000/- was awarded, details of which are as follows:Loss of depend...
Centravis Production Ukraine Vs. Gallium Industries Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:05. 11.2014 Judgment delivered on:02. 12.2014 % + EX. P. 275/2011 CENTRAVIS PRODUCTION UKRAINE ..... Decree Holder Versus GALLIUM INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Judgement Debtor Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Decree Holder: Mr Amit Bansal, Ms Manisha Singh & Ms Senjul Khanna, Advocates. For the Judgement Debtor: Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.EA(OS) 134/2012 (Objections by judgement debtor) 1. These are objections filed by the judgement debtor. By these objections the prayer made is that the execution petition No.275/2011 filed by the decree holder to enforce the foreign award dated 31.03.2011, which has morphed into a decree, be dismissed. 1.1 By order dated 09.05.2012, both the execution petition, as well as the objections filed by the judgement debtor represented by the captioned application, were disposed of in view of the fact that the aforementioned a...
Sandeep Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2386/2012 Reserved on :11. 11.2014 Pronounced on :02. 12.2014 IN THE MATTER OF: SANDEEP KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Yudhister Bhardwaj, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. M.P. Singh, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Rajat Arora, Advocate for R-2. None for respondent No.3 CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying inter alia for quashing of the entire selection process undertaken by the Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS) on behalf of the respondent No.2/Bank of India, pursuant to the advertisement issued on 15.7.2011. He has also questioned the selection of the respondent No.3 in the OBC category to the post of Law Officer Scale-I and prays that he be appointed with the respondent No.2/Bank in place of the said respondent.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent No.2/Bank had issued an advertiseme...
Roop NaraIn Vs. Secretary(Labour) and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 2nd December, 2014 + W.P.(C) 1197/2013 ROOP NARAIN Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Sudeep Dey, Adv. versus SECRETARY(LABOUR) AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sumit Chander, Adv. for R1 and R-2. Mr.S.S.Ray, Ms.Rakhi Ray, Mr.Rishi Raj Jaiswal, Mr. Vaibhav Gulia, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby directing the respondent to implement the award dated 30.04.1997 passed by the Industrial Tribunal in I.D.No.1146/84, in favour of the petitioner, who has not entered into any settlement with the Management. Further seeks directions to pay full back wages in terms of the award mentioned above.2. On the last date of hearing counsel for respondent No.3 specifically stated that the settlement had been arrived at between the workers and the Establishment and same has been recorded in W.P.(C) No.4490/1997 dispo...
Gvr Infra Projects Limited Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1533/2014 GVR INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr Atul Sharma, Mr Milanka Chaudhury, Mr Sarojanand Jha & Ms Isha J.Kumar, Advs. versus % UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Jasmeet Singh, CGSC with Ms Kritika Mehra, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER0212.2014 IA No.24084/2014 (Exemption) Allowed subject to just exceptions. OMP No.1533/2014 1. Issue notice to the respondents.2. Mr. Jasmeet Singh accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1.3. I am informed by Mr. Jasmeet Singh that the contract in issue is being executed through the Engineering Consultant, i.e., RITES Ltd. Therefore, in view of the order that I propose to pass, both counsels say that the notice need not be issued to the other respondents.4. Mr. Nayar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, says that the letter dated 19.11.2014 issued by RITES Ltd., whic...
Rajinder Kumar Mittal Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,deihi-i
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
$~1 to 3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE No.102/2014 Date of decision:2. d December, 2014 RAJINDER KUMAR MITTAL ..... Petitioner Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Gopalia, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,DEIHI-I ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik & Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Advocates. CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE No.103/2014 M/S PARVEEN TOBACCO CO PVT LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Gopalia, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-I, ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik & Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Advocates. CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE No.104/2014 PARVEEN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. C. Hari Shankar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Gopalia, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,DEIHI-I ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rahul Kaushik & Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWA...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Krishan Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on July 24, 2014 Judgment delivered on December 02, 2014 + ITA502000 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Versus + SHRI KRISHAN KUMAR ..... Respondent ITA692004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Versus M/S SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD... Respondent + ITA4572004 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Versus M/S SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD... Respondent + ITA4602004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD... Respondent + ITA5242004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus M/S SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD... Respondent + ITA5762008 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI..... Appellant versus SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel for appellant/revenue. Mr. Ajay Vohra,Sr.Adv. with Ms Kavita Jha and Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates for respondent/assessee. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'...
Sandeep Antil Vs. Staff Selection Commission and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8362/2014 Decided on : IN THE MATTERS OF : SANDEEP ANTIL0112.2014 ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Advocate versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Harvinder Oberoi, Advocate for R-4/FCI. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 10.06.2013 and the order dated 27.01.2014 issued by the respondent No.3/Regional Director (NR) of the respondent No.1/Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder he was informed that his candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.4/FCI was cancelled and he was debarred for a period of three years from the Commissions examinations.2. With the consent of the parties, the...
Smt. Shanta Agnihotri Vs. M/S. Aman Associates (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 520/2013 and C.M. No.7804/2013 (stay) 1st December, 2014 % SMT. SHANTA AGNIHOTRI Through: ......Petitioner Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate. VERSUS M/S. AMAN ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. ...... Respondent Through: Mr. A.K. Upadhyay, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the trial court dated 8.5.2013 by which the trial court has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner/defendant, in a suit for specific performance and damages, to cross-examine the witness of the plaintiff PW-1 with respect to questions as to why secondary evidence should not be allowed to be led/proved by PW1.2. It is an admitted fact on record that respondent/plaintiff has been allowed to lead secondary evidence and therefore when secondary evidence is allowed to be led then before leading secondary evidenc...
Manjeet Katariya Vs. Staff Selection Commission and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8406/2014 Decided on:01. 12.2014 IN THE MATTERS OF : MANJEET KATARIYA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Advocate versus STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Deepak Dewan, Advocate for R-4/FCI. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the show cause notice dated 10.06.2013 issued by the respondent No3/Regional Director (NR) of the respondent No.1/Staff Selection Commission (in short SSC), whereunder he was informed that on failure to show cause, his candidature in the Combined Recruitment for Assistant Grade III in General, Depot, Technical and Accounts Cadre and Hindi Posts (AG-II) in the Examination, 2012 held for respondent No.4/FCI , would be cancelled and he would be debarred for a period of five years from the Commissions examinations.2. With the consent of the parties...
- ‹ Prev
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- Next ›
- Last »