Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar & Ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 14, 2014 + CRL.A. 307/2014 ANIL @ ANNU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Mukesh Birla, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Singh, SHO/Anand Vihar Railway Station CRL.A. 739/2014 ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Avninder Singh, Advocate with Ms.Sumi Anand and Mr.Siddhant Srivastava, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Singh, SHO/Anand Vihar Railway Station CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Involvement of the local police leading to the registration of the FIR Ex.PW-2/A commenced when DD31 was recorded at PS Neb Sarai at 12:55 in the middle of the night on November 16, 2009 that at Jhuggi No.D- 144, J.J.Camp a fight was taking place.2. Being handed over a copy of the DD entry, HC Umesh PW-5, accompanied by Ct.Akhile...
Abhay Ram Vs. State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.667 of 2008 RISHI & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Khanna and Mr. Sanat Tokas, Advocates. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Subhash, PS: Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. AND CRL.A. No.704 of 2008 ABHAY RAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant K. Sud and Mr. Ajay P. Tushir, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Subhash, PS: Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Khanna and Mr. Sanat Tokas, Advocates for Respondents. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1411.2014 1. There are two appeals before this Court. Criminal Appeal No.667 of 2008 is by 14 Appellants and is directed against the judgment dated 30th May 2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) convicting them for the offences under Sections 149/325 read with Section 149 and Section 323 read wi...
Ranjit Kumar Jha Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) No.7812/2014 Decided on :14. h November, 2014 RANJIT KUMAR JHA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashish Mohan, Mr. Chetan Wahi & Ms. Mehak, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.18338/2014 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to the deficiency being rectified. The application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) No.7812/2014 & C.M. No.18337/2014 (for stay) 1. Issue notice of the writ petition as well as the stay application. Mr. Jagjit Singh, the learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents on the question of grant of stay. In the instant case, the legality and the validity of the order dated 29.10.2014 has been challenged by the petitioner on account of the fact that the same is in violation of the principles of nat...
Educare Limited & Anr Vs. S.K. Sachdev & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~43. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1151/2014 % Judgment reserved on 4.9.2014 % Judgment pronounced on 14.11.2014 EDUCARE LIMITED & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through : Ms.Anuradha Salhotra, Mr.Sumit Wadhwa, Mr.Zeeshan Khan and Mr.Tushar John, Advocates versus S.K. SACHDEV & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr.M.K. Miglani, Mr.Aayushmaan Gauba and Mr.Kapil Kumar Giri, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J IA.No.7512/2014 & IA.No.10541/2014 1. This is an application filed by the plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. While issuing summons to the defendants this court had restrained the defendants from using the trademark/ trade name, ShreeRam World School and the domain name www.shreeram.in, as it was deceptively and phonetically similar to the plaintiffs trade-mark SHRI RAM / SHRIRAM in relation to its services.2. IA.No.10541/2014 has been filed by the defendants under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC for vacation of the interim...
Anil @ Annu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 14, 2014 + CRL.A. 307/2014 ANIL @ ANNU Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Mukesh Birla, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Singh, SHO/Anand Vihar Railway Station CRL.A. 739/2014 ASHOK KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.Avninder Singh, Advocate with Ms.Sumi Anand and Mr.Siddhant Srivastava, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.Ram Singh, SHO/Anand Vihar Railway Station CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Involvement of the local police leading to the registration of the FIR Ex.PW-2/A commenced when DD31 was recorded at PS Neb Sarai at 12:55 in the middle of the night on November 16, 2009 that at Jhuggi No.D- 144, J.J.Camp a fight was taking place.2. Being handed over a copy of the DD entry, HC Umesh PW-5, accompanied by Ct.Akhile...
Sapna Vs. Mukesh Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. REV. No.523/2012 & CM Nos. 18103/12, 4751/14 & 7833/14 14th November , 2014 % SAPNA Through: ......Petitioner Mr. D.K.Rustogi, Mr. B.S.Bagga and Mr. Ishaan Saraswat, Advocates. VERSUS MUKESH GUPTA Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhinav Tyagi and Mr. F.Hasan, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25 B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Rent Controller (RC) dated 2.5.2012 by which the Rent Controller has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the suit premises RCR5232012 being the front side portion of the shop Page 1 of 9 no.3, Gandhi Market, Mirdard Road...
Kulwant Kaur Vs. Amrinder Kaur & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:14. h November, 2014 % + TR. P. (C) No.15/2013 KULWANT KAUR Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Nalin Tripathi, Adv. Versus AMRINDER KAUR & ANR Through ..... Respondents Mr.P.S.Goindi, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The abovementioned transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 24 CPC for transfer of Civil Suit No.223/2007, titled Kulwant Kaur v. Amrinder Kaur & Anr., pending in the Court of Sh.V.K.Jha, learned Civil Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi to this Court and consolidate the same with CS(OS) No.114/2008 pending before this Court.2. It is alleged in the transfer petition that the suit filed by the petitioner before this Court being CS(OS) No.114/2008 titled as Kulwant Kaur v. Amrinder Kaur & Anr. is a suit for specific performance which was filed on the basis of the fact that respondent No.1 failed to perform the terms of the family settlement. The present...
Rishi and ors. Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.667 of 2008 RISHI & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Khanna and Mr. Sanat Tokas, Advocates. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Subhash, PS: Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. AND CRL.A. No.704 of 2008 ABHAY RAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Jayant K. Sud and Mr. Ajay P. Tushir, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. SI Subhash, PS: Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Khanna and Mr. Sanat Tokas, Advocates for Respondents. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER1411.2014 1. There are two appeals before this Court. Criminal Appeal No.667 of 2008 is by 14 Appellants and is directed against the judgment dated 30th May 2008 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) convicting them for the offences under Sections 149/325 read with Section 149 and Section 323 read wi...
Pawan Kumar Dhingra Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-iii and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 7639/2014 & CM180042014 OM FINCAP PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7640/2014 & CM180062014 PAWAN KUMAR DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7642/2014 & CM180202014 OM PRAKASH DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VII, & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Salil Kapoor with Mr Vikas Jain For the Respondents : Mr Rohit Madan with Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri and Mr Akash Vajpai CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. These writ petitions arise out of common sequence of events and are, therefore, being disposed of together, the main writ petition being WP(C) 7642/2014 (Om Prakash Dhingra v. CIT and Others). In that petition, there is a prayer for ...
Dow International Technology Corporation and ors Vs. Elixir Trading Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:14. h November, 2014 % + I.A. No.16142/2013 in CS(OS) No.612/2013 DOW INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Shiraz Patodia & Ms.Shikha Tandon, Advs. versus ELIXIR TRADING PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Adv. with Mr.Rishabh Maheshwari & Ms.Samreen, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks and passing off etc. was filed by the plaintiffs on the basis that the plaintiffs are the owners of the trademark DOW and several variants thereof. The interim order was passed against the defendants restraining them from using the trademarks DOW, DOW FLOW and FilmTec. The said interim order was also confirmed by order dated 29th October, 2013. The defendant made the request before the Court to dispose of the material seized by the Local Commissioner under a...
- ‹ Prev
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- Next ›
- Last »