Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamal Kishore & Ors. Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT New Delhi Judgment delivered on:14. h November 2014 + CRL.A. 658/1999 KAMAL KISHORE & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mohammed Shamikh, Advocate Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State AND CRL.A. 693/1999 VIDYA SAGAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mohammed Shamikh, Advocate Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. By this appeal filed under section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Cr.P.C.), the appellants seek to challenge the impugned judgment dated 19.11.1999 and order on sentence dated 22.11.1999, whereby the appellants herein were convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 302/452/506/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( hereinafter referred to as IPC) and were sentenced to un...
Om Prakash Dhingra Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-Vii, & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 7639/2014 & CM180042014 OM FINCAP PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7640/2014 & CM180062014 PAWAN KUMAR DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7642/2014 & CM180202014 OM PRAKASH DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VII, & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Salil Kapoor with Mr Vikas Jain For the Respondents : Mr Rohit Madan with Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri and Mr Akash Vajpai CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. These writ petitions arise out of common sequence of events and are, therefore, being disposed of together, the main writ petition being WP(C) 7642/2014 (Om Prakash Dhingra v. CIT and Others). In that petition, there is a prayer for ...
Sanraj Farms Private Limited Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:14. h November, 2014 + W.P.(C) 7831/2014 SANRAJ FARMS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Ravi Gupta, Sr.Adv. with Mr. C.P.Sharma and Mr.Ajay Gulati, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon and Mr. Gursharan Singh, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) C.M.No.18385/2014 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7831/2014 & C.M.No.18384/2014 (Stay) 1. Vide present petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing the directions/orders issued by the Public Grievance Commission/respondent No.2 in its order dated 26.12.2013, 30.01.2014, 04.03.2014 issued to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and the Deputy Commissioner, New Delhi.2. The petitioner further seeks directions thereby declaring that the Public Grievance Commission has no powers/authority or jurisdiction t...
M/S Dabur India Ltd. Vs. M/S Alka Ayurvedic Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No.2639/2008 M/S DABUR INDIA LTD. Through: .... Plaintiff Mr. Hemant Singh, Adv. with Ms. Mamta R. Jha, Adv. and Mr. Manish K. Mishra, Adv. versus M/S ALKA AYURVEDIC PVT. LTD. Through: .... Defendant Mr. M.K. Miglani, Adv. with Mr. Aayushmaan Gauba, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL % ORDER1411.2014 I.A. No.10059/ 2013 (Order VI Rule 17 CPC) in CS (OS) No.2639/ 2008 1. By virtue of this application under Order VI Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC, the Plaintiff seeks amendment of paras 2 (ii) and 20 of the reply to preliminary submissions/ objections and para 9 of the replication.2. The dispute between the parties is with regard to infringement and passing off in respect of trademark HAJMOLA. The learned Single Judge vide order dated 17.12.2008 granted an ex-parte injunction in favour of the Plaintiff. The order was vacated on 06.10.2009 on the grounds, inter alia, that the Defendant was the registered owner of the alleg...
Pj Pothen and Anr Vs. Sanghamitra ( Cghs) Society and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO3512014 Decided on 14th November, 2014 PJ POTHEN AND ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Jogy Scaria, Adv. Versus SANGHAMITRA ( CGHS) SOCIETY AND ORS..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) CM No.18671/2014 (Delay) For the reasons explained in the application delay of 13 days in refiling is condoned. Application is disposed of. CM No.18670/2014 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. FAO3512014 1. Appellants filed a petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Act) before the trial court for grant of succession certificate in respect of estate of Late Rev. Fr. P.J.Gregory Paruvaparambil. It was alleged that deceased died in a hospital in Cochin, within the state of Kerala on 2nd July, 2008 at the age of 69. Deceased was unmarried. Appellants were brother and sister of deceased, who was ...
Sangeeta & Ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.(M) No.54/2014 and C.M. Nos.697-700/2014 14th November, 2014 % SANGEETA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Vinay Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Samson Honey, Advocate and Mr. R. Ravi, Advocate. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: S.I. Amarjeet Singh, P.S. Geeta Colony in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenge the impugned order dated 17.9.2013 by which the first appellate court refused to condone the delay of 37 days in filing the appeal.2. In my opinion, delay of 37 days is hardly such a delay which should not have been condoned because once there is delay, some amount of negligence is implicit, however, that itself is not a good ground to deny condonation of delay because it is settled law in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in th...
Pawan Kumar Dhingra Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-iii & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 7639/2014 & CM180042014 OM FINCAP PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7640/2014 & CM180062014 PAWAN KUMAR DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7642/2014 & CM180202014 OM PRAKASH DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VII, & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Salil Kapoor with Mr Vikas Jain For the Respondents : Mr Rohit Madan with Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri and Mr Akash Vajpai CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. These writ petitions arise out of common sequence of events and are, therefore, being disposed of together, the main writ petition being WP(C) 7642/2014 (Om Prakash Dhingra v. CIT and Others). In that petition, there is a prayer for ...
Alka Vs. Ashok Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h November, 2014 % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 71/2013 ALKA Through : versus ASHOK KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Ms. Suman Malhotra, Adv. ..... Respondent Mr. Sheetesh Khanna, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The appellant has challenged the order dated 15 th October, 2013 disposing of her two applications filed under Order 16 Rule 14 read with Section 151 CPC for the purposes of adjudication on her application for maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.3. The first application was filed by the appellant pointing out her husbands stand in his affidavit dated 6 th August, 2013 that he does not have any documentary proof relating to his employment during the last five years and is not having the salary slips. It is further pointed out that the respondent - husband had taken a categorical stand t...
Om Fincap Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-iii, & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 7639/2014 & CM180042014 OM FINCAP PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7640/2014 & CM180062014 PAWAN KUMAR DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III & ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 7642/2014 & CM180202014 OM PRAKASH DHINGRA ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VII, & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Salil Kapoor with Mr Vikas Jain For the Respondents : Mr Rohit Madan with Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri and Mr Akash Vajpai CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. These writ petitions arise out of common sequence of events and are, therefore, being disposed of together, the main writ petition being WP(C) 7642/2014 (Om Prakash Dhingra v. CIT and Others). In that petition, there is a prayer for ...
Smt. Bimla Devi Vs. Dinesh Kumar Gupta & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.(M) No.1011/2014 14th November, 2014 % SMT. BIMLA DEVI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Bharat Singh Sisodia, Advocate. Versus DINESH KUMAR GUPTA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.18513/2014 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. + C.M.(M) No.1011/2014 and C.M. No.18514/2014 (stay) 2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by the defendant no.3 in the suit for partition impugning the order dated 17.2.2014 passed by the trial court striking off the defence of the petitioner/defendant no.3 inasmuch as petitioner/defendant no.3 did not comply with the earlier order passed by the court dated 29.10.2013 directing petitioner/defendant no.3 to file an affidavit with respect to rent received from all the tenants of the suit property and thereafter to deposit ...
- ‹ Prev
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- Next ›
- Last »