Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Vs. Sangeeta Narang
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 17, 2014 + RSA3462014 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Mohd. Elahi, Advocate versus SANGEETA NARANG Through: ..... Respondent Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % The concurrent findings returned by both the courts below are that the appellant-plaintiff is not entitled to recovery of `11,500/- in lieu of arrears of rent for the period in question, as appellant had failed to duly prove the Sale Deed in question. The factual background of this case already stands noted in the impugned judgment and needs no reiteration. At the hearing, learned counsel for appellant had contended that both the courts below have erroneously held that the Sale Deed of 1 st March, 2006 in favour of appellant does not stand duly proved and infact, in the written statement by respondent No.2, there is a tacit admission of relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties and thus, the judgment of the cour...
Smt. Santoshi and ors Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2672014 Decided on 17th November, 2014 SMT. SANTOSHI & ORS Through: versus ..... Appellants Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellants are legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Nath. They filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi seeking compensation of `4 lacs in respect of death of Shri Ram Nath in relation to Firozpur Janta Express train. She alleged that on 8th October, 2012 deceased-Ram Nath was travelling from Tuglakabad Station to New Delhi Railway Station by Firozpur Janta Express when he accidentally fell down from the crowded compartment of the running train near Shivaji Bridge, Delhi due to heavy rush and sudden jerk. Deceased was rushed to RML Hospital where he died on 10:50 pm on the same day.2. Respondent alleged that deceased did not die in an untoward incident within the m...
Dharambir Sharma and anr Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 13, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1013/2014 DHARAMBIR SHARMA & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellants Mr.S.K.Goyal, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP for the State with Inspector Indraj Singh, PS Adarsh Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Appellants Dharambir Sharma and Rakesh Sharma who are father and son challenge the impugned judgment dated April 29, 2014 convicting them for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC and 307/34 IPC and directing them to undergo imprisonment for life for offence punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC with a fine of `50,000/- and Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of seven years and a fine of `15,000/- for offence punishable under Sections 307/34 IPC vide the impugned order dated April 30, 2014.2. Assailing the judgment learned counsel for the ap...
Sh Vinod Kumar Vs. Sh Sarwan Kumar Sharma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 17, 2014 + RSA2032014 SH VINOD KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. D.D. Sharma, Advocate versus SH SARWAN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Suresh Chand, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % C.M. No.13016/2014 (u/S5of the Limitation Act) There is delay of 94 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal. Notice. Mr. Suresh Chand, Advocate, accepts notice of this application on behalf of respondents and he submits that he will file his vakalatnama / Power of Attorney within a week. For reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and delay is condoned. Application is disposed of. C.M. No.13015/2014 (u/S5of the Limitation Act, 1963 r/w Sec. 151 CPC) Learned counsel for applicant-appellant submits that this RSA No.203/2014 Page 1 application is not pressed as it has been inadvertently filed and infact, there was delay of 196 days in filing the first appeal. In view of aforesaid...
SudhIn Sarkar and anr. Vs. Lufthansa German Airlines
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 17, 2014 + W.P.(C) No.4387/2013 SUDHIN SARKAR & ANR. Represented by: ..... Petitioners Mrs. Mridula Ray Bhardwaj for Dr. Sumant Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Alok Bhasin and Ms.Poonam Das, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners/workmen have challenged the award dated 31.12.2012, passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi, (in short the Tribunal), whereby compensation for a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- each has been directed to be paid in their favour.2. Accordingly, seek directions thereby directing the respondent Management to reinstate the petitioners in service with back wages.3. Ms.Mridula Ray Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have successfully completed 10 years and 20 years...
Satya Narayan Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 17, 2014 + LA.APP. 377/2014 SATYA NARAYAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for respondent No.1-UOI Ms. Mrilani Sen Gupta & Mr. Mrinmoi Chatterjee, Advocates for respondent No.2DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL % C.M. No.18850/2014 (u/O XLI R3A CPC r/w Sec. 5 of the Limitation Act) There is delay of 885 days in filing the accompanying appeal. The impugned judgment is of 5th March, 2012. In the instant application seeking condonation of delay, it is categorically asserted that after passing of the impugned judgment, counsel for appellant had applied for its certified copy which was handed over to appellant in May, 2012, who had further handed it over to some villagers along with certain blank papers signed by him under an impression that the appeal will be filed on his behalf. It is further st...
Mahender Singh Rawat and anr Vs. Ram Kishan and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~A-3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:17. 11.2014 + MAC.APP. 564/2010 MAHENDER SINGH RAWAT & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr. Rajat Joseph, Advocate versus RAM KISHAN & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocate for R1 Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal has been filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 10.03.2010. Brief facts giving rise to the filing of the claim petition are that the claimant along with his colleague Kamlesh Kumar was going on foot on the pavement to see a fair in Nehru Stadium. When they reached near Pragati Vihar Hostel, the claimant was hit by a motorcycle said to be driven by appellant No.1. The claimant/respondent No.1 suffered injuries.2. Based on the evidence on record, the tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.98,200/- to respondent No.1. The liability has been fastened upon the appellants namely the owner and driver of the vehicle. A perusal...
Mushahid Raza @ Raju Vs. Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5181/2014 MUSHAHID RAZA @ RAJU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. versus GOVT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State. SI Shailendra Kr. Singh, P.S. Khajuri Khas, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 17749/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5181/2014 & Crl.M.A. 17748 & 17750/2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.324/2005 dated 19.08.2005 registered under Sections 498A/406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, at P.S. Khajuri Khas, on the ground that matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. Respondent No.2/complainant is present in person. ...
Smt Manjeet Kaur Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5178/2014 SMT MANJEET KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Avtar Singh & Ms. Richa Samhna, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for the State. SI Sandeep Ranwal, P.S. Jaitpur. Ms. Anjali Sharma, & Mr. Akhil Verma, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % ORDER1711.2014 Crl.M.A. 17743/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed off. Crl.M.A. 17744/2014 For the reasons stated in the application the delay in re-filing the petition stands condoned. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5178/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.318/2012 under Section 135 Electricity Act, Police Station Jaitpur, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for State, as well as for the respondent/BSES, enter appearance and accept notice.4. It is stated that the a...
Union of India and ors. Vs. Satpal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:17. 11.2014 % W.P. (C) 5686/2014 C.M. Nos.14056-14057/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate AND % W.P.(C) 5762/2014 C.M. Nos.14205-14206/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates versus SATPAL SINGH Through: ..... Respondent Mr. K.R. Chawla, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. With the consent of the parties, both the petitions have been heard together. The respondent/applicant had challenged his order of transfer before the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as the CAT) and sought appropriate directions from the Central Government.2. By the order dated 22nd November, 2013, which is impugned in the present wri...
- ‹ Prev
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- Next ›
- Last »