Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pooja Sharma Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order: November 17, 2014 + W.P.(C) 7819/2014 POOJA SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. O.P. Agarwal, Mr. Jeet Ram, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC, Mr. T.P.Singh, Advocates for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) By this petition filed under Article 226, the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus or certiorari for quashing the letter dated 20.8.2014; for acceptance of the mark sheet and provisional certificate dated 12.8.2012 and 17.8.2012 respectively, for acceptance of the mark sheet dated 6th August, 2013 issued in continuation of the previous mark sheet dated 12.8.2012; and a direction to the respondents for the issuance of an appointment letter to the petitioner for the post of Assistant Sub Inspector for which she had qualified all the necessary tests and a...
Shri Aita Ram Vs. Hindustan Times Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. h November, 2014 + W.P.(C) 1000/2013 & CM Nos.16423/2013 & 3505/2014 SHRI AITA RAM Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advocate. Versus HINDUSTAN TIMES LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Dr. A.M. Singhvi and Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Ms. Meghna Mishra and Mr. Nakul Sachdeva, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.W.P.(C) 1000/2013 1. The present petition is directed against the order dated 12.10.2012 passed by the Executing Court, whereby the execution petition was dismissed by recording that since the award dated 23.01.2012 passed by the learned Tribunal is silent regarding back wages, therefore, it cannot be presumed that the learned Tribunal has also granted back wages to the decree holders, therefore, decree cannot be executed regarding the back wages as prayed.2. It is pertinent to me...
Manjeet Singh and Ors Vs. State and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5160/2014 MANJEET SINGH & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr. Anil Singh, Advocate with petitioners. versus STATE & ORS Through .... Respondent Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor. Sub Inspector Dinesh Kumar. Mr. K.K. Vijay, Advocate with R2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.50/2014 on 24.01.2014, registered under Sections 406, 498-A, 34 IPC at police station Nihal Vihar, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, and Mr. K. K. Vijay, Advocate for the complainant, who has been arrayed as respondent No.2 to this petition, enter appearance and accept notice. The complainant, who is also present in person, is also identified by the Investigating Officer, Sub Inspector Dinesh Kumar.3. It is s...
Hima Sood Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:17. 11.2014 + W.P. (C) 7889/2014 ..... Petitioner HIMA SOOD Through: Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel for GNCTD, for Directorate of Education and DSSSB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 19.09.2014 which rejected her application - OA no.1752/2013. She had applied for the post of PGT (Biology) advertised by the Government of NCT of Delhi through the Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (hereafter referred to as DSSSB) being advertisement no.2/2010; the number of posts advertised were 12. W.P.(C)7889/2014 Page 1 2. The relevant facts are that the essential qualification for the post of PGT is a masters degree in the subject concer...
Smt.Santosh Kumari Vs. Smt. Sumitra Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.(M) No.540/2011 & C.M.No.9060/2011 (Stay) 17th November, 2014 % SMT.SANTOSH KUMARI Through: ......Petitioner Son of the petitioner in person. VERSUS SMT. SUMITRA DEVI & ORS. Through: ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The son of the petitioner appears in person and seeks adjournment. I refuse to grant an adjournment in the facts of the present case, and more so because this case has already come up for hearing since 06.5.2011 on over a dozen of hearings.2. The impugned order which is challenged in the present case is order dated 11.11.2010 which has dismissed an application seeking review of the order dated 11.5.2010. By the order dated 11.5.2010, the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for framing additional issues was dismissed.3. A reading of the impugned order dated 11.11.2010 shows that the petitioner/plaintiff is deliberately del...
Shri Aita Ram Vs. Hindustan Times Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. h November, 2014 + W.P.(C) 1000/2013 & CM Nos.16423/2013 & 3505/2014 SHRI AITA RAM Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sarvajeet Kumar Thakur, Advocate. Versus HINDUSTAN TIMES LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Dr. A.M. Singhvi and Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Ms. Meghna Mishra and Mr. Nakul Sachdeva, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.W.P.(C) 1000/2013 1. The present petition is directed against the order dated 12.10.2012 passed by the Executing Court, whereby the execution petition was dismissed by recording that since the award dated 23.01.2012 passed by the learned Tribunal is silent regarding back wages, therefore, it cannot be presumed that the learned Tribunal has also granted back wages to the decree holders, therefore, decree cannot be executed regarding the back wages as prayed.2. It is pertinent to me...
Vicky Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 11, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 297/2014 VICKY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mahendru and Mr.Sahil Malik, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CRL.A. 299/2014 MOHAN LAL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mahendru and Mr.Sahil Malik, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CRL.A. 1303/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for versus BUNTY @ RAJIV & ANR Represented by: CRL.A.No.297/2014 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mahendru and Mr.Sahil CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Appellants Mohan Lal and his son Vicky do not dispute that an incident took place at around 10:30 PM on July 30, 2011 involving the...
Jagdish P. Khanna Vs. Lt. Governor and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4263/2014 ... Petitioner JAGDISH P. KHANNA versus ... Respondents LT. GOVERNOR & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4 For the Respondent No.2 : Mr N. P. Sahni with Mr Ruchesh Sinha : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Mr Siddharth Panda and Mr P. Sahu : Mr Pawan Mathur with Mr Himanshu Gupta CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is seeking the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. Consequently, the petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act), in respect of which th...
AmIn Khan and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~113 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 6548/2014 & CM No.15615/2014 AMIN KHAN & ORS .... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Sumit Bansal, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr Arnab Advocate for R-1 Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for R-2 Mr Pawan Mathur, Advocate for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No....
Harish Chand and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
67 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:17. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5376/2014 & CM107042014 HARISH CHAND & ORS ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Murari Gupta. For the Respondents : Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI. Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi for LAC/L&B. Mr Pawan Mathur with Mr Himanshu Gupta for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act) in respect of which Award No.80E/70-71 dated 09.01.1981 was...
- ‹ Prev
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- Next ›
- Last »