Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maj.Baldev Chaman(Retd) Vs. Sheila Chaman
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h November, 2014 % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 140/2014 & CM No.18914/2014 MAJ.BALDEV CHAMAN(RETD) ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Adv. versus SHEILA CHAMAN ..... Respondent Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. The appellant has assailed the order dated 10 th September, 2014 whereby his petition under Section 24 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 seeking a declaration that his marriage with the respondent be declared nullity has been dismissed, primarily for the reason that the petitioner had not pleaded basic facts necessary to disclose cause of action in the present petition. The Family Court has further held in the impugned order that, if it was accepted that the appellant was a patient of recurring epilepsy at the time of marriage, the same was not recognized as a condition for valid marriage under the unamended Special Marriage Act, 1954....
Pawan Mishra Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :18. h November, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 2086/2014 PAWAN MISHRA Through : ..... Petitioner Ms.Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Ms.Naina Dubey, Adv. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State with SI Gajender, PS Vijay Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Petitioner Pawan Mishra is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.503/2013 under Section 376(2)(f) & (n)/376 IPC, PS Vijay Vihar, Delhi.2. Chargesheet in the matter has already been filed and the case is at the stage of Prosecution Evidence wherein the statement of the Complainant/Prosecutrix has not been recorded so far.3. Perusal of the contents of the FIR reveals that the Petitioner is husband of Rinka, who is cousin (daughter of maternal Aunt) of the Prosecutrix.4. As per the complaint, the Petitioner had been harassing her for about four months prior to registration of FIR (date of FIR is 16.10.2013...
Sish Pal Singh Vs. Rajesh Bhardwaj and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :10. h October, 2014 Judgment pronounced on :18th November, 2014 % + I.A. No.13130/2012 in CS (OS) No.1588/2010 SISH PAL SINGH Through .....Plaintiff Mr.B.B. Sawhney, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Adv. versus RAJESH BHARDWAJ & ORS. ..Defendants Through Mr. Sunil K.Jha, Adv. with Mr.Santosh K. Jha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff has filed a suit for possession, declaration, permanent and mandatory injunction in respect of land admeasuring 4 Bighas 10 Biswas out of Khasra No.73, situated at village Biharipur, in the abadi of Sonia Vihar, Shahdara, Delhi-110094 (hereinafter referred to as the suit land).2. Brief facts of the case are that on or about 15th April, 2004 the plaintiff purchased a piece of the suit land from Shri Mansa Ram, son of Late Shri Sukh Ram through a registered General Power of Attorney. The plaintiff carried out some temporary fencing of the suit la...
Union of India and Anr. Vs. Sudhanshu Kumar Khare and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 07.2014 Pronounced on:17. 11.2014 + W.P.(C) 7370/2010, C.M. NOS.6770/2014, 8140/2014, 8169/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. Sanjay Jain, ASG with Sh. Jasmeet Singh, Sh. Ruchir Mishra and Sh. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates, for UOI. Versus SUDHANSHU KUMAR KHARE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Respondent No.1 in person. Sh. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Supriya Juneja and Sh. Viraj Gandhi, Advocates, for Resp. Nos.5 and 7. Sh. G.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Piyush Sharma, Advocates, for Resp. No.4. Sh. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for Resp. No.8/UPSC. Sh. Darpan Wadhwa, Sh. Arun Khatri and Ms. Roshni Namboodiry, Advocates, for Sh. D.S. Shukla/Applicant. Sh. Tarun Sharma with Ms. Boudh Prabha, Advocates, for Resp. Nos. 14, 33, 41, 47, 73 and 84. + W.P.(C) 7371/2010, C.M. NO.6771/2014 BHUPINDER KUMAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. Tarun Sharma and Ms. Boudh Prabha, Advocates. Versus U...
State Vs. Bunty @ Rajiv and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 11, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: November 17, 2014 % + CRL.A. 297/2014 VICKY Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mahendru and Mr.Sahil Malik, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CRL.A. 299/2014 MOHAN LAL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mahendru and Mr.Sahil Malik, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CRL.A. 1303/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for versus BUNTY @ RAJIV & ANR Represented by: CRL.A.No.297/2014 & conn.matters ..... Respondents Mr.R.S.Malik, Advocate with Mr.Puneet Mahendru and Mr.Sahil CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARDEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PARDEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Appellants Mohan Lal and his son Vicky do not dispute that an incident took place at around 10:30 PM on July 30, 2011 involving the...
Sanjeev Kumar and Anr Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5173/2014 SANJEEV KUMAR & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Kamal Nijhawan with Mr. Sumit Gaur, Advs. with petitioners in person versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for the State. SI Subodh Panwar, P.S. Harsh Vihar. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of FIR No.49/2011 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act at Police Station Harsh Vihar on 27.03.2011 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties 2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. The second respondent/complainant, Meena, is present in person. She is also identified by the Investigating Officer, Sub-Inspector Subodh Panwar, Police Station Harsh Vihar, who i...
Kanchan Kapoor and Ors. Vs. Sarwan Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RCR No.338/2011 & CM Nos. 15924/2011 (stay) 17th November, 2014 % KANCHAN KAPOOR & ORS. Through: ......Petitioners Mr. J.S.Vohra, Adv. VERSUS SARWAN KUMAR Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Vijay K. Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (in short the DRC Act) impugning the judgment of the of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 4.6.2011 which has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners/tenants and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed by the respondent/landlord under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act with respect to the tenanted premises being two rooms, store, kitchen, bathroom, W.C on the ground floor together with one mezzanine room between ground and first floor above the garage of the property bearing N...
Ran Singh Kohar Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:17. 11.2014 % W.P. (C) 7885/2014 C.M. Nos.18485-18486/2014 RAN SINGH KOHAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC on behalf of Union of India with Mr. Naginder Benipal, Advocate. Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Addl. Standing Counsel for Govt. of NCT of Delhi with Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of Union of India. With consent of counsel, the matter heard finally.2. The petitioner assails the order dated 08.09.2014 passed in O.A. No.2457/2013 by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The Tribunal dismissed the petitioners original application by the impugned order.3. The petitioner was appointed as a Su...
Mushahid Raza @ Raju Vs. Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5181/2014 MUSHAHID RAZA @ RAJU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. versus GOVT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State. SI Shailendra Kr. Singh, P.S. Khajuri Khas, Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 17749/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5181/2014 & Crl.M.A. 17748 & 17750/2014 1. This petition has been moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.324/2005 dated 19.08.2005 registered under Sections 498A/406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, at P.S. Khajuri Khas, on the ground that matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Counsel for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. Respondent No.2/complainant is present in person. ...
Lufthansa German Airlines Vs. SudhIn Sarkar and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-17-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: November 17, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3256/2013 LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Alok Bhasin and Ms.Poonam Das, Advocates. Versus SUDHIN SARKAR & ANR. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mrs. Mridula Ray Bhardwaj for Dr. Sumant Bhardwaj, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.W.P.(C) 3256/2013 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the award dated 31.12.2012, passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi, (in short the Tribunal), whereby a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- each has been directed to be paid in favour of the respondents No.1 and 2/workmen.2. Case of the petitioner Airlines as averred in the petition is that the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 were employed with the petitioner as Supervisors and were performing supervisory and managerial duties. Their services could be terminated by the petitioner in exercise of powers ...
- ‹ Prev
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- Next ›
- Last »