Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
North Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr Vs. Shri Umesh Kumar Gupt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO4732013 Decided on 18th November, 2014 NORTH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil K Goel, Adv. versus SHRI UMESH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Respondent was enrolled as a contractor with the appellant. Appellant awarded work of improvement of Hall, Duty Room adjoining Labour Room in GLM Hospital in City Zone to the respondent. Work was completed by the respondent in time, inasmuch as, same was inspected by the Engineer-in-Chief who recorded the same in measurement book No.1018, after taking measurement. After completing the work respondent raised the final bill. Appellant did not pass the bill despite requests of the respondent for preparing and passing the final bill. Instead, appellant started disputing the factum of work done by the respondent. In these circumstances, respondent invoked Arbitrati...
M/S. Shiv Dayal Mal Mauji Ram Vs. Dhanpat Rai and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. REV.No.178/2014 18th November, 2014 % M/S. SHIV DAYAL MAL MAUJI RAM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil K. Pruthi, Advocate. Versus DHANPAT RAI AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Vijay Pandey, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the judgment of the Rent Controller (RC) dated 11.2.2014 by which the RC has dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant and has decreed the bonafide necessity eviction petition filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act with respect to the tenanted shop forming part of property bearing no.2914, Bahadur Garh Road, Teliwara, Delhi-110006.2. Respondents/landlords filed the bonafide necessity eviction petition stating th...
Avneet Singh and ors Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4243/2014 AVNEET SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Sangeeta jain, Advocate with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Nishi Jain, APP with ASI Shri Ram, PS Hari Nagar R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 18.11.2014 % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.253/2012 registered under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC, at Police Station Hari Nagar, on 15.07.2012 on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. The second respondent/complainant, Gurpreet Kaur, is present. She is also identified by the Investigating Officer, Assistant Sub-Inspector Shri Ram, Police Station Hari Nagar.4. It is stated that the aforesaid FIR came to be lodged at the instance of the c...
Smt. Nirmala Handa Vs. Smt. Krishna Kaura (Now Deceased) Through Her L ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO1482014 Reserved on 12th November, 2014 Decided on 18th November, 2014 SMT. NIRMALA HANDA Through ..... Appellant :Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Mr. Abhas Kumar, Mr. Arush Khanna and Mr. Subham Tripathi, Advs. versus SMT. KRISHNA KAURA (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS & ANR. ..... Respondents Through :Mr. Jayant Mehta and Mr. Sukant Vikram, Advs. for R-1(i) & (ii) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Respondent No.1(i) and (ii) are sons of deceased respondent No.1 and Late Shri J.L. Kaura (testator); whereas appellant is daughter of Late Shri J.L. Kaura from his first marriage. Respondent No.1 Smt. Krishna Kaura propounded a Will dated 13th December, 1994 (Ex. PW2/1) of Late Shri J.L. Kaura before the trial court and prayed for grant of probate of the said Will. Appellant challenged the Will by filing objections and opposed the grant of probate. During the pendency of probate petition, Smt. Krishna Kaura died and responden...
Shri Puran Chand Khandelwal and anr. Vs. Shri Kewal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.M.(M) No.1525-26/2006 18th November, 2014 % SHRI PURAN CHAND KHANDELWAL & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Prakash Gautam, Advocate. Versus SHRI KEWAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Vishal Bhatnagar, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. At the outset, at the request made on behalf of the petitioners, this petition is treated instead of as a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India invoking which provision the petition has been filed, instead as a petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) because the impugned judgment which is challenged is the judgment of the civil court dismissing the suit of the petitioners/plaintiffs under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.2. The present revision petition is filed impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 4.7.2006 which has dismissed the suit of the petitioners/p...
Sh. Tota Ram Vs. Smt. Asha Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.38/2014 18th November, 2014 % SH. TOTA RAM Through: ......Petitioner Petitioner in person. VERSUS SMT. ASHA SHARMA ...... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner appears in person and again prays for an adjournment. This case is now coming up for the fourth time for admission, the earlier dates being 17.1.2014, 28.05.2014 and 17.11.2014. On all these three dates, the case was adjourned at the request of the petitioner. On the last date being 17.11.2014, while granting adjournment it was made clear that no further adjournment shall be granted.2. In view of the above, request made on behalf of the petitioner for an adjournment is declined.3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order of the trial court dated 20.11.2013 by which the trial court had dismissed the application filed by the petitio...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Madhu Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~A-51,16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 11.2014 MAC.APP. 326/2013 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr.K.L.Nandwani, Advocate versus MADHU DEVI & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr.O.P.Maini, Advocate for R.1 to 5. MAC.APP. 702/2013 SMT MADHU DEVI & ORS Through: ..... Appellants Mr.O.P.Maini, Advocate versus SH WALI RAM & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.K.L.Nandwani, Advocate for R.3. Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate for R.6 & 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. The present two appeals are filed pursuant to an award dated 14.12.2012.2. MAC.APP.No.326/2013 is filed by the appellant New India Assurance Company Ltd. seeking to impugn the compensation awarded.3. MAC. APP. No.702/2013 is filed by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation.4. The brief facts which give rise to the filing of the claim petition are that on 11.09.2009, the deceased Late Shri Virender Singh Negi along with Shri Jitender Si...
Badar Makhmoor(Senior Citizen) Vs. Hakim Zillur Rehman
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.1009/2012 18th November , 2014 % BADAR MAKHMOOR(SENIOR CITIZEN) ......Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui, Mr. Rakesh Bhugra, Mr. M.Tabishzia, Advocates. VERSUS HAKIM ZILLUR REHMAN Through: ...... Respondent Mr. R.K.Trakru and Mohd. Sajid, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.11465/2014 (for revival of the petition) The application is allowed and this petition is revived in view of the order passed by the Supreme Court in the presence of the parties dated 07.5.2014 in Civil Appeal No.5507/2014. CM stands disposed of. CM(M) No.1009/2012 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner/plaintiff/landlord impugning the order of the trial court dated 14.8.2012 by which the trial court has rejected an application under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) and refused to decre...
Sumita Verma and anr Vs. the State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5207/2014 SUMITA VERMA & ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. O.P. Bharti, Advocate with petitioners in person versus THE STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.K. Mishra, APP for State with SI Anil Kumar, PS Dwarka South R-2 in person along with her mother CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) CRL.M.A. No.17819/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5207/2014 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeks quashing of FIR No.60/2012 registered under Section 374/34 IPC and read with Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act, at Police Station Dwarka South, on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.2. Issue notice.3. Mr.P.K. Mishra, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State enters appearance and accepts notice. The second respondent/complainant, namely, Gangotri Kumari...
Kuldeep Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4865/2012 & CM No.9966/2012 KULDEEP SINGH ..... Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Gurdeep Singh. For the Respondents : Mr Mohammad Shariq, for R-1 & 3. Mr Debojyoti Bhattacharya for Mr Joydeep Mazumdar, for R-4. Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC with Mr Amit Kishore Sinha. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners filed the present petitioner, inter alia, praying as under:(ii) Quash/stay the eviction notice dated 28.10.2011 issued by the Respondent No.1 vide its letter No.19188/QAC-IV/PHQ dated 28.10.2011 and letters dated 12.07.2012 & 31.07.2012 for eviction proceedings. (iii) Direct the Respondent No.2 to regularize the Govt. Qtr. No.840, type-II, Sector-III, R.K. Puram, New Delhi in the name of Petitioners wife Smt. Maya Rani. 2. Essentially, the petitioner claims tha...
- ‹ Prev
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- Next ›
- Last »