Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vikram Dutt Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~18 (I) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4844/2014 & CM96662014 VIKRAM DUTT SHARMA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1 For the Respondent No.2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr Ateev Mathur with Ms Richa Oberoi and Ms Jagriti Ahuja : Mr Anurag Ahluwalia : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal for DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition the petitioner is seeking the benefit of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. The petitioner, consequently, seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceeding initiated under the Land Acquisition Act,...
Sports and Leisure Apparel Ltd. Vs. Mcd and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4436/2010 & CM No.9944/2011 SPORTS & LEISURE APPAREL LTD. versus MCD AND ANR. ..... Petitioner ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Sandeep Sethi, Mr Vinay K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr Lalit Gupta, Ms Payal Gupta, Ms Garima Goel, Mr Ashish Kumar, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr H. S. Phoolka, Sr. Advocate with Ms Mini Pushkarna, Ms Shilpa Dewan and Ms Yoothica Pallavi for respondent/MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner inter alia impugns an order dated 24.06.2010 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Officer on Special Duty of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD),imposing damages at the rate of `7,36,000/- per month w.e.f. April 2010 for displaying an advertisement in contravention of the MCDs Outdoor Advertisement Policy, 2007 (hereafter the Outdoor Policy). It was further held the advertisement wa...
University of Delhi Vs. Poonam Sota and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 18th November, 2014. + W.P.(C) 4079/2014 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.G.K.Pathak, Adv. versus POONAM SOTA AND ORS Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Sudesh Kumar Goyal, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Amit Mahajan CGSC with Mr.Nitya Sharma, Adv. for R2,3,5,6. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner prays for setting aside the impugned order dated 30.09.2013 passed by the Controlling Authority/Respondent No.2 in ALC-I/36/302/2013 titled as Smt. Poonam Sota vs. The Registrar, University of Delhi and order dated 02.04.2014 passed in Appeal No.ND. 36(79)/2013-P.A. titled as The Registrar, University of Delhi vs. Smt. Poonam Sota passed by respondent No.3 i.e. Appellate Authority.2. The issue raised in this petition has already been decided by this Court in batch matters with lead petition bearing W.P.(C) No.5138/2014 on 13.08.2014, whereby, held...
Samir Mathur Vs. Monika Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Dated of Decision:18. h November, 2014 + MAT.APP. 40/2012 and CM Nos. 7874-7875/2012 SAMIR MATHUR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. B.A. Khan, Advocate versus MONIKA SHARMA Through: ..... Respondent Nemo CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT % (ORAL) The appellant is the husband who had sought divorce from the respondent and divorce petition was filed through his attorney i.e. his father. The trial court vide impugned judgment of 12th December, 2011 has dismissed the aforesaid divorce petition on the ground that the Special Power of Attorney is not on record and the allegations of cruelty levelled against the respondent are exclusively in the knowledge of appellant and his father cannot depose about them. At the hearing of this appeal, learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the course of hearing of the divorce petition in the trial Court, original Special Power of Attorney in favour of appellants father was inadvertently not ...
Subhash and ors Vs. the State Govt of Nct Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5155/2014 SUBHASH & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Preeti Srivastava, Advocate with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Nishi Jain, APP for the State with SI Yograj PS Mahindera Park. R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J (ORAL) Crl. M.A. Nos. 17680/2014 (for exemption) Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. CRL.M.C. 5155/2014 and Crl. M.A. 17679/2014 (for stay) 1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved seeking quashing of FIR No.172/2010 registered under Sections 498A/406 IPC at Police Station Mahendra Park on 23rd July, 2010 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. Issue notice. Ms. Nishi Jain, Additional Public Prosecutor enters appearance and accepts notice on behalf of the State/respondent No.1.3. P...
Rohan Solomon Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4453/2014 ROHAN SOLOMON .... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr B.S. Maan and Mr Vishal Maan, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 Mr Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award under the Land Acq...
Mahender Pal Tyagi Vs. Sh. Shiv Kumar Tyagi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 18, 2014 + RSA3472014 MAHENDER PAL TYAGI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rakesh Kumar & Mr. Prabhat Kaushik, Advocates versus SH. SHIV KUMAR TYAGI Through: ..... Respondent Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL % C.M.No.18916/2014 (u/S151CPC) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. C.M.No.18917/2014 (u/S151CPC) For reasons stated in the application delay of 164 days in re-filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. Application is disposed of. RSA No.347/2014 The appellant and the first respondent are real brothers and respondent No.2 in this appeal is the real sister of appellant. Appellants suit for declaration of being owner of the suit property stands dismissed by the Trial Court and the said dismissal is affirmed in the first appeal. The factual narration of this case already stands noticed in the impugned judgment and needs no reproduction. According to the appellant, out of love and affecti...
Surinder Kaur Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. h October, 2014 Date of Decision:18. h November, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 2580/2013 SURINDER KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. K.K. Manan & Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: .....Respondent Mr. Navin Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 By way of the present petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter after referred to as Cr.P.C.) the petitioner has assailed the order dated 31.05.2013 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed.2. The factual matrix of the case is that the petitioner Smt. Surinder Kaur and co-accused Shri Tejwant Singh being Directors of the accused company namely M/s. Skipper Towers Pvt. Ltd. fraudulently and dishonestly induced various investors/ public persons to invest their money for the purpose of allotting flats in Skipp...
Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4973/2014 & CM No.9948 /2014 (Stay) ANIL GUPTA .... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Richa Oberoi and Ms Jagriti Ahuja, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Ajay Digpaul and Mr C.M. Manaktala, Advocates for R-1 Mr Siddharth Panda, Advocate for R-2 Mr Pawan Mathur, Advocate for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2/Land Acquisition Collector (South) states that he has filed the counter affidavit along with an application for exemption from filing the English translation of the possession proceedings. 27.09.2014. The same was filed vide diary No.187481 on That application is supposedly listed by the Registry for 12.01.2015. A copy of the said counter affidavit along with An...
M/S Chintels Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 4452/2014 M/S CHINTELS EXPORTS PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr B.S. Maan and Mr Vishal Maan, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for R-1 & R-2 Mr Arjun Pant, Advocate for R-3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) which came into effect on 01.01.2014. A declaration is sought to the effect that the acquisition proceeding, which is the subject matter of the present writ petition, ought to be deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.2. The Award un...
- ‹ Prev
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- Next ›
- Last »