Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Airports Authority of India Vs. M/S Jagson Airlines Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1830/2005 19th November, 2014 % AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ......Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, adv. VERSUS M/S JAGSON AIRLINES LTD. Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R. Sudhinder and Ms. Prerana Amitabh, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the judgment of the first appellate court dated 24.5.2005. The first appellate court by the impugned judgment set aside the judgment of the original court/Civil Judge dated 7.7.2004 by which the Civil Judge had dismissed the objections under Section 30 and 33 of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940 filed by the respondent/objector against the Award of the arbitrator dated 28.10.1998. First appellate court set aside the judgment of the original court/Civil Judge and the Award firstly on the ground that the Award ...
M/S. Panorama Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Nandu Bhardwaj and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~R84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1577/2013 M/S. PANORAMA EXPORTS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepak R.Dahiya, Adv. Versus NANDU BHARDWAJ AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Yogesh Saini, Amicus Curiae. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide present petition, the petitioner seeks directions for setting aside the orders dated 31.05.2008, whereby the petitioner Management was proceeded ex-parte; accordingly award dated 29.09.2009 passed by the Labour Court in ID No.138/2007.2. Also seeks directions for initiating proceedings against respondent nos. 1 to 4, for the abuse of procedure.3. Perusal of the order sheets reveal that notice in the instant petition was issued vide order dated 08.03.2013. Since the petitioner failed to serve the respondent nos. 1 to 4 by ordinary process, they filed CM. No.15526/2013 seeking substituted servi...
Gopal Kishan Vs. Kanchan @ Menu
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 19, 2014 + C.M.(M) No.690/2014 & C.M. Nos. 11605-06/2014 GOPAL KISHAN Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate versus KANCHAN @ MENU Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Tabrez Alam, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % In a petition for restitution of conjugal rights filed by petitioner, the respondent had filed an application under Section 24 of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to seek interim maintenance and vide impugned order of 21st January, 2014, interim maintenance of `7,000/- per month each to the two children of the parties, aged seven years and three years respectively, has been granted, which is under challenge in this petition. It is evident from trial courts order of 16th September, 2013 that while arguments on application under Section 24 of The Hindu Marriage Act,1955 were being addressed, petitioner-husband had withdrawn his petition for restitution of conjugal rights, whic...
M/S R S Industries Vs. Competition Commission of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2014 W.P.(C) 5947/2014 & CM145382014 RAJKUMAR DYEING & PRINTING WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Rakesh Sinha and Mr Pradeep Gupta. For the Respondents : MrVaibhav Gaggar, Mr Abhimanyu Chopra, Ms Reena kumara and Mr Naveen Kumar for R-1. Mr AnujAggarwal, Mr Niti Jain and Mr Gaurav Khanna for R2. AND + W.P.(C) 6260/2014 & CM151462014 M/S R S INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. .... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rana S. Biswas and Mr Sunil Sharma. For the Respondents : Mr Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr Abhimanyu Chopra, Ms Reena Kumari and Mr Naveen Kumar for R-1. Mr Vineet Malhotra for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 These petitions call into question the penalties imposed by th...
Praveen Sharma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:19. h November, 2014 % + TEST CASE NO.84/2013 PRAVEEN SHARMA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. with Ms. Rashmi Verma and Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advs. versus STATE .....Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present probate petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for grant of probate/letters of administration in respect of the registered Will dated 15th May, 1998 executed by Late Pandit Sham Lal Sharma (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) who died on 28th January, 2004 at Delhi.2. It has been stated by the petitioner, daughter-in-law of the deceased that the deceased left behind the following class I heirs: (i) Smt. Krishna Devi (widow). (ii) Shri Kulbhushan Sharma (Son). (iii) Shri Jai Prakash (Son). (iv) Smt. Nisha (grand-daughter). (v) Smt. Praveen Sharma(daughter-in-law...
Raman Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.274/1999 Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 RAMAN ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ankur Sood, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) was filed by two brothers, Raman Kumar and Arun Kumar. By order dated 20 th August, 2014, Arun Kumar was held to be a juvenile on the date of commission of offence and accordingly the benefit under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 was granted. The said order records that Arun Kumar had stated that he would not like to contest his conviction but the order of sentence may be set aside and quashed. The appeal, therefore, filed by Arun Kumar stands disposed of vide order dated 20th August, 2014. Th...
Ram Kumar and ors Vs. State of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3271/2014 & CRL.M.A. 14677/2014 RAM KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. J.N. Pathak, Advocate Versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for State with SI Jaspal Singh, PS Mangol Puri Mr. D.K. Srivastav, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of FIR No.803/2013 registered under Sections 380/451/448/506/120B IPC at Police Station Mangol Puri on 13.12.2013 on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties.2. This matter came up for preliminary hearing on a number of dates previously when counsel for the second respondent/complainant was also present. However, no formal notice appears to have been issued in the matter so far. Consequently, notice is now issued to the respondents.3. Counsel for respondent No.1/State, as well as...
Sanjay Gupta Vs. Rajiv Gupta and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Cont. Cas (C) No.765/2012 Decided on :19. h November, 2014 Petitioner SANJAY GUPTA Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Mr. Sameer Vashisht & Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Advs. Versus Respondents RAJIV GUPTA & ANR. Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner, Sanjay Gupta, against respondent No.1, Rajiv Gupta and his sister-in-law (respondent No.2), Alka Gupta on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the judgment dated 9.1.2006.2. Before dealing with the allegations of contempt, it would be worthwhile to give brief background of the case. Rajiv Gupta, respondent No.1 herein, filed a suit for partition, rendition of accounts and injunction in respect of the properties allegedly owned and possessed by his father L.R. Gupta in the capacity of karta of HUF. The details of the immovable properties were mentioned in schedule A attached to the plaint and d...
Sandeep Kumar and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order:19. h November 2014 + W.P.(C) 963/2014 SANDEEP KUMAR & ORS Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Ms. Rekha Palli, Ms. Ankita Patnaik, Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocates ..... Respondents Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr.Amrit Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. In this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the six petitioners have challenged the introduction of the criteria of mandatorily qualifying the interview test comprising 25 marks for selection to the post of ASI (Radio Mechanic) and HC (Radio Operator) in Border Security Force Communication, set up in September 2013 through an advertisement. The petitioners also seek quashing of the results of the interview held for the aforesaid post at Delhi Centre at STS BSF, New Delhi from 23.12.2013 to 1.1.2014...
Pawan Mishra Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-18-2014
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :18. h November, 2014 % + BAIL APPLN. 2086/2014 PAWAN MISHRA Through : ..... Petitioner Ms.Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Ms.Naina Dubey, Adv. versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State with SI Gajender, PS Vijay Vihar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The Petitioner Pawan Mishra is seeking regular bail in case FIR No.503/2013 under Section 376(2)(f) & (n)/376 IPC, PS Vijay Vihar, Delhi.2. Chargesheet in the matter has already been filed and the case is at the stage of Prosecution Evidence wherein the statement of the Complainant/Prosecutrix has not been recorded so far.3. Perusal of the contents of the FIR reveals that the Petitioner is husband of Rinka, who is cousin (daughter of maternal Aunt) of the Prosecutrix.4. As per the complaint, the Petitioner had been harassing her for about four months prior to registration of FIR (date of FIR is 16.10.2013...
- ‹ Prev
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- Next ›
- Last »