Delhi Court November 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balkishan Thapar Vs. Dharmendra, Principal Secretary, Govt. of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Cont. Cas (C) No.677/2013 & C.M. No.15162/2014 Decided on :19. h November, 2014 BALKISHAN THAPAR Through: Petitioner Mr. R.P. Luthra, Advocate. Versus DHARMENDRA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, SC for R-1 to 3 & 5. Ms. Zubeda Begum, SC with Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is a contempt petition filed by the petitioner against the respondents on account of the alleged wilful disobedience of the order dated 27.7.2012 passed in Cont. Cas (C) No.120/2012. A direction has also been sought in the contempt petition for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of the acquired plot of land.2. I have heard Mr. R.P. Luthra, the learned counsel for the petitioner. So far as the prayer of allotment of an alternative plot in contempt proceedings is concerned, that prayer cannot be allowed. It has to be by way of an independent writ petition. Th...
Ashok Kumar Vs. C.B.i./Acb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 138 of 2010 Reserved on:10th November 2014 Decision on:19. h November 2014 SHABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocates. Versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 139 of 2010 JHARKHANDI RAI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anupama Sharma and Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha, Advocates. versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 140 of 2010 MAHMOOD Through: Crl. A. No.138/2010 & connected matters ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 141 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr...
Faheem Ahmad Vs. C.B.i./Acb
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 138 of 2010 Reserved on:10th November 2014 Decision on:19. h November 2014 SHABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocates. Versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 139 of 2010 JHARKHANDI RAI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anupama Sharma and Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha, Advocates. versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 140 of 2010 MAHMOOD Through: Crl. A. No.138/2010 & connected matters ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 141 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr...
Tejram Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2014 + TEJRAM CRL.A. 142/2012 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Chetan Swarup, proxy counsel for Mr. Naresh C. Sharma, Adv. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.N.Dudeja, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with ASI Bijendra Singh, Police Station Mehrauli. Mr. R.P. Khatana, Adv. for respondents No.2 to 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This criminal appeal u/s 372 Cr.P.C has been filed by the victim Shri Tej Ram, feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.11.2011 in case FIR No.548/2004 u/s 308/34 IPC, P.S. Mehrauli, vide which respondents 2 to 6 were acquitted.2. Succinctly stated, prosecution case is as follows:D.D.No.19 dated 05.09.2004 was recorded on the basis of an information received from HC Rohtash of PCR regarding quarrel at the house of Dev Ram at Village Chandanhola. HC Hanuman Sahai(PW7) along with HC Manohar (PW8) reached the sp...
Rajnish Kumar Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7452/2014 & CM No.17671/2014 RAJNISH KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate. versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Vaibhav Kalra and Ms.Sumedha Dang, Advocates for respondent nos.1 & 2. Ms.Suparna Srivastava, Advocate for the respondent no.3. Date of Decision :19. h November, 2014 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:a) Issue a writ of certiorari, mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to admit the petitioner in M.Ch.(Paediatrics Surgery), PGIMER, Dr.R.M.L.Hospital for the Session 2014-2015. b) To direct the respondents to admit the petitioner in M. Ch.(Paediatrics Surgery), PGIMER, Dr.R.M.L.Hospital for the Session 2014-2015 in terms of the observation and ratio laid down by the Division Bench of the Honble High ...
Mayank Pathak Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2014 BAIL APPLN. 1947/2014 MAYANK PATHAK Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhagat Sharma, Advocate along with the petitioner (in JC) versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for State Mr. Sunil K. Mittal and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocates for complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. By virtue of this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.386/2013 u/s 498A/313/406/34 IPC registered with Police Station Rani Bagh, District North West.2. It is submitted by Sh. Ramesh Gupta, learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody for the last 90 days. The petitioner never raised any demand of dowry. The complainant used to pressurise the petitioner to purchase his own house in Delhi or to get the property bearing No.BP-143, Shalimar Bagh, Delhi transf...
M/S Polythene Bag Factory Vs. Assistant P.F. Commissioner
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P. (C) No.5362/2013 M/S POLYTHENE BAG FACTORY ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, Adv. Versus ASSISTANT P.F. COMMISSIONER ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 16.04.2010 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, in ATA No.398 (5) of 2003.2. The petitioner has also assailed the recovery proceedings emanating therefrom.3. Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an Establishment functioning in the Forest Department under the State of Gujarat. It has not applied voluntarily for the coverage of The Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Act, 1952 (for short EPF Act), but the EPF Authority / Respondent brought the petitioner / Establishment ...
Mahmood Vs. C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 138 of 2010 Reserved on:10th November 2014 Decision on:19. h November 2014 SHABBAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq Choudhary, Advocates. Versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 139 of 2010 JHARKHANDI RAI Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Anupama Sharma and Mr. Niraj Kumar Jha, Advocates. versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 140 of 2010 MAHMOOD Through: Crl. A. No.138/2010 & connected matters ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr. Farooq versus C.B.I./ACB Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates. WITH CRL.A. 141 of 2010 ASHOK KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Anwar A. Khan and Mr...
Md Dilawar Mir Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1535/2014 MD DILAWAR MIR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjiv K. Jha, Mr. Gopal K. Sharma, Mr. Vikash Kumar and Mr. Vikash Kumar, Advocates. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv. with Insp. Dharmendra Kumar, CBI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CRL.A. 1535/2014 Admit. CRL.M.(B) 10918-10919/2014 These applications seek stay of the impugned judgment on conviction dated 27.09.2014; as well as the impugned order on sentence dated 01.11.2014 qua the appellant-Md Dilawar Mir, passed by the Special Judge, CBI, in CC No.71/11, by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 120B IPC and with Section 13(1)(d)(ii) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment with a fine...
Danish Infratech Private Limited Vs. Delhi Cantonment Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.7139/2014 & CM No.16698/2014 (for stay). DANISH INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED .. Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Raman Gandhi, Adv. Versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .. Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, besides seeking declaration that Section 248(1) of the Cantonments Act, 2006 is unconstitutional and ultra vires the scheme of the Constitution of India, also seeks quashing of the notices dated 23rd September, 2013, 22nd January, 2014, 28th February, 2014 and 27th August, 2014 of the respondent under the said Section 248 (1) to the petitioner and order of restraining the respondent from proceeding to demolish the property of the petitioner as well as a direction to the respondent, to permit the petitioner to...
- ‹ Prev
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- Next ›
- Last »